DocketNumber: No. 26617-06
Citation Numbers: 2009 T.C. Memo. 40, 97 T.C.M. 1157, 2009 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 38
Judges: \"Vasquez, Juan F.\"
Filed Date: 2/18/2009
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/21/2020
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
VASQUEZ,
Pursuant to
If the Court determines that petitioner is entitled to relief pursuant to
FINDINGS OF FACT
Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated by this reference.
Petitioner resided in California when the petition was filed. Petitioner's former spouse, Orrin Karp *39 (Mr. Karp), intervened.
Petitioner and Mr. Karp were married on March 30, 1993. During their marriage Mr. Karp worked in the commercial real estate business. Petitioner worked as a legal secretary until approximately June 1994 and did not work outside the home for the rest of their marriage. Petitioner and Mr. Karp separated on April 29, 2004, and were divorced on March 29, 2007.
During their marriage the couple lived in a home originally purchased by Mr. Karp as separate property. Mr. Karp used his separate funds as a downpayment in purchasing the house and in making significant improvements to the house. On December 2, 1993, Mr. Karp quitclaimed his separate property interest in the house to petitioner and himself as community property. This house thereby became the community property of petitioner and Mr. Karp.
Petitioner and Mr. Karp did not initially file tax returns for 1995 through 2002. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) contacted petitioner and Mr. Karp about their failure to file tax returns. Petitioner and Mr. Karp, with an accountant's assistance, filed delinquent tax returns for years 1995 through 2001.
Approximately 1 year after the 1995 through 2001 returns were filed, petitioner *40 and Mr. Karp were contacted by and met with an IRS collection officer. Petitioner and Mr. Karp then hired a different accountant to prepare amended returns for 1995 through 2001. After the amended returns were filed, the IRS audited them. The IRS questioned some of the business deductions and other deductions claimed on their amended joint returns. The IRS sent notices of deficiency to petitioner and Mr. Karp on October 17, 2005, for their 2000 return and on October 31, 2005, for their 2001 return.
Petitioner and Mr. Karp timely filed their 2003 joint income tax return. The IRS disallowed certain expenses claimed on Schedule C, Profit or Loss from Business, such as commissions and fees paid to others. On November 7, 2005, the IRS sent petitioner and Mr. Karp a notice of deficiency regarding their 2003 tax return.
The years in issue before this Court are 2000, 2001, and 2003, and the following amounts include tax, penalties, and interest that had accrued as of July 10, 2006. For 2000 there is an underpayment 2 of $ 42,820.22 and an understatement 3 of $ 110,064.24; part of this understatement resulted from a math error made by petitioner and Mr. Karp. For 2001 there is an understatement *41 of $ 6,285.53. For 2003 there is an understatement of $ 130,804.33.
On July 10, 2006, petitioner's outstanding tax liabilities (including the underpayment for 2000 and understatements for 2000, 2001, and 2003) were paid from the proceeds of the sale of petitioner's and Mr. Karp's family home.
On August 23, 2005, petitioner filed Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief. Petitioner requested o o o o
On December 26, 2006, petitioner filed her petition with this Court to review respondent's determination with respect to her request for
OPINION
Mr. Karp deeded the family home to petitioner and himself as community property. Subsequently, the family home was sold, and the proceeds were used to pay the joint tax liabilities of petitioner and Mr. Karp. Petitioner has asked for a review of her eligibility for
We have faced a similar factual scenario before. In
Even if petitioner is entitled to
Accordingly, since we are precluded from providing petitioner a refund, we are unable to grant her relief under
To reflect the foregoing,
1. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code. ↩
2. An "underpayment" is the taxpayer's failure to pay the tax shown as due on a return. It may be determined by subtracting the amount of the tax actually paid by the taxpayer from the amount of tax reported on the return.↩
3. An "understatement", generally equated with a "deficiency", is the taxpayer's failure to correctly report on a return the amount of tax due. It may be determined by subtracting the amount of the tax imposed which is shown on the return from the amount of the tax required to be shown on the return.