DocketNumber: No. 9715-96
Judges: PANUTHOS
Filed Date: 1/29/1999
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/20/2020
Decision will be entered under Rule 155.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAWSON, JUDGE: This case was assigned to Chief Special Trial Judge Peter J. Panuthos, pursuant to the provisions of section 7443A(b) (4) and Rules 180, 181, and 183. PANUTHOS, CHIEF SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE: Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's 1993 Federal income tax in the amount of $ 5,851 and additions to tax under
The issues remaining for decision are: (1) Whether petitioner is precluded from claiming a net operating loss carryover from 1987 and 1988 to 1993 in the amount of $ 114,000 (or any greater amount); (2) whether petitioner is subject to the addition to tax under
Some of the facts have been stipulated, and they are so found. The stipulation of facts 1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23">*25 and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference.
BACKGROUND
Petitioner was employed by the Federal Government during the period 1970 through 1988. Petitioner has a master's degree in library science, a master's degree in international law, and a bachelor of laws degree. Petitioner and his spouse (the McGuirls) owned several businesses and rental properties during the 1980's.
1. THE BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING
The McGuirls were the subject of an involuntary petition in bankruptcy filed under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on March 2, 1990. The petition was filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia. The case was converted to a chapter 11 case for a short period of time in 1990, before being converted back to a chapter 7 case. On January 25, 1994, the bankruptcy court denied the McGuirls a discharge in the bankruptcy proceeding. 1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23">*26
On August 4, 1995, the trustee of the bankruptcy estate filed a proposed final account with the bankruptcy court. On August 7, 1995, the trustee filed a final report with the bankruptcy court. On August 24, 1995, the McGuirls filed an objection to the proposed final account. On October 13, 1995, the bankruptcy court approved the trustee's final application for compensation and ordered the final distribution of funds on hand in petitioner's bankruptcy estate.
Petitioner subsequently appealed the order providing for the trustee's compensation and fees that were approved by the bankruptcy court. At the time of trial on the matter before us: (1) Undisbursed funds remained in the bankruptcy estate's account; (2) the bankruptcy court had not discharged the trustee of the estate, nor had the bankruptcy court ordered the estate closed; and (3) the estate in petitioner's bankruptcy case remained open pending the conclusion of litigation between the McGuirls and the trustee of the bankruptcy estate.
2. THE PROCEEDING 1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23">*27 IN THE TAX COURT
Respondent issued a statutory notice of deficiency to petitioner for the 1993 taxable year on February 20, 1996.
On May 20, 1996, a petition was filed with this Court. Petitioner asserted, among other things, that this Court did not have jurisdiction over him due to the chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding. On June 7, 1996, petitioner filed a motion to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. On August 7, 1996, we denied petitioner's motion, as the stay imposed under
3. TAX RETURN INFORMATION
The pertinent information in this record regarding petitioner's Federal income tax returns is as follows:
Year From | |||||||
Tax | Date | NOL | NOL | Which NOL | |||
Year Filed | Claimed | Carryover | Claimed 1984 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
1985 | --- | --- | --- | --- | |||
1986 | timely | $ 17,501 | --- | --- | |||
1987 | 5/5/88 | 57,738 | --- | --- | |||
1988 | timely | 194,301 | --- | --- | |||
1989 | 1/22/97 | 873,917 | --- | --- | |||
1990 | timely | 11.163 | --- | --- | |||
1991 | timely | --- | $ 22,331 | 1986 | |||
1992 | 8/30/96 | --- | 59,669 | 1987/1988 | |||
1993 | 8/14/96 | --- | 114,000 | 1987/1988 |
* * * *
DISCUSSION
1. NET OPERATING LOSS CARRYOVER FROM 1988 TAXABLE YEAR
In general,
Such election shall be made in such manner as may be prescribed by the Secretary, and shall be made by the due date (including extensions of time) for filing the taxpayer's return for the taxable year of the net operating loss for which the election is to be in effect. Such election, once made for any taxable year, shall be irrevocable for such taxable year.
Respondent contends that petitioner is precluded from claiming a net operating loss carryover from taxable year 1987 or 1988 because petitioner has not filed an election as required under
Since petitioner did not make an election under
In the instant case, there is no evidence that the 1987 or 1988 net operating loss would not have been absorbed through the operation of the 3-year carryback. We agree with respondent and conclude that petitioner is not entitled to the claimed net operating loss carryover.
A bankruptcy estate is created in an involuntary case upon the filing of the petition with the bankruptcy court. Bankruptcy Code,
Any remaining net operating loss belonging to the estate will be returned to the debtor-taxpayer after the termination of the estate.
Respondent contends that, even if petitioner were able to satisfy the requirements of
As stated above, the termination of the estate is the equivalent of the closing of the estate. In order for a bankruptcy estate to be closed, upon the full administration of the estate and the discharge of the trustee, the bankruptcy court issues a final decree closing the case.
Because of our findings and conclusions above, we need not consider the additional issues of: (1) Whether petitioner has substantiated the expenses generating the losses that 1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23">*35 petitioner seeks to carry forward, and (2) whether petitioner is otherwise entitled to deduct such expenses under the Internal Revenue Code.
2.
Respondent determined that petitioner is liable for the addition to tax under
A taxpayer may avoid the addition to tax by establishing that the failure to file a timely return was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect. Rule 142(a);
Petitioner asserts that reasonable cause existed with respect to his failure to file a timely return. Petitioner contends that, since 1993 was a postbankruptcy petition year, the documents petitioner needed to file the return were in the possession of the bankruptcy trustee. As such, petitioner did not have access to the documents.
Despite petitioner's assertion, there is nothing in the record to suggest petitioner ever attempted to file a timely return. Petitioner never requested an extension to file his return as provided under
3. 1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23">*38
Respondent determined an addition to tax against petitioner under
Under
We have considered all of petitioner's arguments and, to the extent not discussed above, find them to be without merit.
To reflect the foregoing,
Decision will be entered under Rule 155.
1. Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
2. For convenience, all sums have been rounded to the nearest dollar amount.↩
3. With certain exceptions, the filing of a petition under the Bankruptcy Code operates as a stay of any civil action or proceeding concerning the debtor or the debtor's property.
4. Respondent issued separate statutory notices of deficiency to both petitioner and his spouse, Marlene McGuirl, for the taxable year 1993. Marlene McGuirl has not petitioned this Court.↩
5. The amount of income reported on the return is not in dispute.↩
6. Respondent bears the burden of proof on any increase in deficiency. Rule 142(a). The increase in deficiency is based on the amount of income reported on petitioner's delinquent 1993 income tax return, filed after the petition was filed in this case. Since petitioner has reported the income and does not otherwise dispute the receipt of the income as reported, respondent's burden of proof has been met.↩
7. Respondent subsequently conceded the item of income resulting in the request for an increase in deficiency, along with additional Schedule A itemized deductions claimed by petitioner. Respondent's burden of proof on this increase in deficiency is therefore not an issue.
1. Petitioner filed joint income tax returns with his spouse for all tax years in question.↩
2. Information relating to petitioner's 1984 and 1985 tax years has not been made part of this record.↩
8. The reasoning behind petitioner's contention that he is entitled to utilize the losses as a carry forward to his 1993 tax year is that he filed his 1993 tax return in Aug. 1996. If the bankruptcy case terminated in Oct. 1995, the losses would be available after that date for his use.↩
Lone Manor Farms, Inc. v. Commissioner ( 1974 )
in-re-krystal-cadillac-oldsmobile-gmc-truck-inc-debtor-krystal-cadillac ( 1998 )
United States v. Boyle ( 1985 )
Estate of Frank Duttenhofer, Deceased, Albert J. Uhlenbrock ... ( 1969 )
Jack L. Firsdon and Ruth A. Firsdon v. United States ( 1996 )