DocketNumber: No. 9198-00
Filed Date: 10/3/2001
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
*300 Decision will be entered for Respondent.
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
FOLEY, JUDGE: By notice dated May 24, 2000, respondent determined a $ 298,992 deficiency, a $ 74,598
FINDINGS OF FACT
Petitioners, husband and wife, resided in Fresno, California, at the time their petition was filed.
In 1994, petitioners created, and diverted their taxable income to, seven trusts. Petitioners funded the trusts with their real property and businesses, including rental properties, two day care centers, and a print shop. Payments for services rendered, rental income, and other funds were deposited in the trusts' bank accounts. *301 Petitioners drew numerous checks on these accounts.
Petitioners, on May 30, 1997, filed their 1994 income tax return and reported no Federal income tax liability. U.S. Fiduciary Income Tax Returns for the taxable year 1994 were filed on June 24 and 25, 1997 for the seven trusts. Collectively, the trusts reported as their gross receipts all income earned by petitioners in 1994. In 2000, respondent audited petitioners 1994 return, reconstructed their income, disallowed their unsubstantiated deductions, determined income and self-employment tax deficiencies, and imposed a
Petitioners failed to comply with this Court's April 27, 2001, Order to File Response to Request for Admissions and May 1, 2001, Order to Compel Responses to Interrogatories and Documents, and have made no meaningful attempt to participate in administrative proceedings, or the discovery process. At trial, respondent requested that the Court impose a penalty pursuant to
OPINION
At the outset, we note that petitioners failed*302 to cooperate with respondent and as a result, pursuant to section 7491, have the burden of proof. Petitioners' primary contention is that respondent's determinations are not entitled to a presumption of correctness. We disagree.
Respondent's determinations were supported by substantive evidence that the taxpayer received unreported income. See
Petitioners diverted income from their businesses to several trusts. These payments are ineffective assignments of income. Thus, the diverted income is taxable to petitioners. See
Petitioners instituted these proceedings primarily for delay, repeatedly advanced frivolous and groundless arguments, and failed to comply with orders of this Court or cooperate with respondent. Despite this Court's warnings, Mr. Combs persistently asserted frivolous constitutional arguments. We, therefore, impose a $ 25,000
Contentions we have not addressed are moot, irrelevant, or meritless.
To reflect*304 the foregoing,
Decision will be entered for Respondent.
R. E. L. Finley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, ... ( 1958 )
Johnny Weimerskirch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ( 1979 )
Gerald J. Rapp and Mary H. Rapp v. Commissioner of Internal ... ( 1985 )
Finley v. Commissioner ( 1956 )
Weimerskirch v. Commissioner ( 1977 )