DocketNumber: No. 19636-95
Judges: GERBER
Filed Date: 4/1/1999
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/21/2020
1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 124">*124 An appropriate order and decision will be entered for respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
[1] GERBER, JUDGE: Respondent determined deficiencies in income tax and additions to tax for petitioner's 1983 through 1987 taxable years as follows:
Additions to Tax | |||
Year | Deficiency | Sec. 6653(b)(1) | Sec. 6653(b)(2) |
1983 | $ 52,450 | $ 26,225 | n1 |
1984 | 27,852 | 13,926 | n1 |
1985 | 12,376 | 6,188 | n1 |
Additions to Tax | ||||||
Year | Deficiency | Sec. 6653(b)(1)(A) | Sec. 6653(b)(1)(B) | |||
1986 | $ 39,035 | $ 29,276 | 1987 | 18,827 | 14,120 |
[2] Due to concessions Additions to Tax Year Deficiency Sec. 6653(b)(1) Sec. 6653(b)(2) 1983 $ 50,450 $ 25,225.00 n1 1984 25,892 12,946.00 n1 1985 10,749 5,374.50 n1
1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 124">*125 Additions to Tax Year Deficiency Sec. 6653(b)(1)(A) Sec. 6653(b)(1)(B) 1986 $ 36,917 $ 27,687 1987 16,063 12,047
[3] Due to petitioner's failure to communicate with respondent or to appear at the Court's Kansas City, Missouri, February 22, 1999, trial session, respondent moved to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution and for a default judgment. Because respondent bears the burden of proving fraud within the meaning of
[5] The matters deemed admitted by reason of petitioner's default, or through the undenied allegations in respondent's answer and through deemed admissions under Rule 90, are as follows:
[6] For the years 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, and 1987, petitioner engaged in the business of farming and received income that he did not report in the amounts of $ 183,570, $ 187,755, $ 154,755, $ 190,791, and $ 166,208, respectively. Petitioner failed to file timely Federal income tax returns or pay taxes due for his taxable years 1983 through 1987.
[7] Petitioner was convicted of and incarcerated for willful failure to file Federal income tax returns for1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 124">*127 1986 and 1987. Petitioner's supervised release from prison was revoked because of his continuing failure to file returns in accord with an order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas.
[8] Beginning in 1980, petitioner used as his bank the National Commodity Exchange, operated by Larry Dale Martin to hide his financial transactions from the Internal Revenue Service.
1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 124">*128 [9] Petitioner has failed to communicate with the Court and respondent, and he has otherwise failed to "plead" or "proceed" within the meaning of
[10] Based on the deemed admitted facts and respondent's pleading, we find petitioner intended to conceal, mislead, or otherwise prevent the collection of his taxes. See
[11] Based on the above, we hold that petitioner is liable for the addition to tax for fraud for his 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, and 1987 taxable years. With respect to all other matters determined, respondent does not bear the burden of proof, and petitioner is found to have failed properly to prosecute and defaulted on his opportunity to show respondent's error(s).
[12] To reflect the foregoing,
[13] An appropriate order and decision will be entered for respondent.
1. 50 percent of the interest due on the entire deficiency.↩
1. Respondent's motion, in the portion containing the concessions, referenced
1. 50 percent of the interest due on the entire deficiency.↩
2. Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as amended and in effect for the period under consideration, and rule references are to this Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
3. Larry Dale Martin has been described as "a 'banker' for tax protesters" as follows:
Under the name of the National Commodity Exchange * * * [Larry
Dale] Martin offered to buy gold and silver coins and bullion
for the accounts of persons distrustful of Federal Reserve notes
and desiring maximum privacy in their financial dealings, and
also to convert gold and silver in the depositors' accounts into
paper money and at the depositor's direction pay his bills with
the paper money. The agreements with the depositors stated that
in buying gold and silver for their accounts and in paying their
bills Martin was 'acting only as an agent for the above
specific purpose[s] and no other.' The agreements also contained
Martin's pledge not to divulge any information about the agency
accounts.
Coninck v. Commissioner ( 1993 )
Smith v. Commissioner ( 1988 )
Donald G. Smith v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ( 1991 )
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner-Cross-... ( 1989 )
Robert W. Bradford v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ( 1986 )