MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINIONFOLEY, Judge: After concessions, the issues for decision, relating to 2009 and 2010 (years in issue), are whether petitioner is liable for income tax deficiencies and additions to tax pursuant to sections 6651(a)(1) and (2) and 6654.2014 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 85">*86 respondent determined that petitioner was liable for additions to tax pursuant to sections 6651(a)(1) and (2) and 6654. On December 10, 2012, petitioner, while residing in California, timely filed a petition with the Court.
OPINIONRespondent was entitled to use the bank deposits method to reconstruct petitioner's income. Seesec. 446(b); Clayton v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 632">102 T.C. 632, 102 T.C. 632">645 (1994). Respondent established, and petitioner did not dispute, that petitioner received $44 in taxable interest during 2010 and had gross receipts of $328,404 and $416,900 relating to 2009 and 2010, respectively. Seesec. 61(a); Weimerskirch v. Commissioner, 596 F.2d 358">596 F.2d 358, 596 F.2d 358">360-362 (9th Cir. 1979), rev'g67 T.C. 672">67 T.C. 672 (1977). Petitioner contends that he was entitled to deduct business expenses relating to the years in issue. He did not, however, maintain sufficient records and did not present sufficient evidence at trial to substantiate such deductions.Seesec. 6001; sec. 1.6001-1(a), Income Tax Regs.
Petitioner did not contest the sections 6651(a)(1) and (2) and 6654 additions to tax. Subject to adjustment to reflect respondent's concessions, we sustain respondent's determinations. SeeRule 34(b)(4); Swain v. Comm'r, 118 T.C. 358">118 T.C. 358, 118 T.C. 358">362-365 (2002).
Contentions">*87 we have not addressed are irrelevant, moot, or meritless.
To reflect the foregoing,
Decision will be entered under Rule 155.