DocketNumber: Docket No. 12247-79
Judges: Scott
Filed Date: 5/5/1981
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
*135
*701 OPINION
Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners' Federal income tax for the calendar year 1977 in the amount of $ 1,623. The only issue for decision is whether petitioners are entitled to a disability income tax exclusion for the calendar*137 year 1977 under the provisions of
Donald B. Pearson (petitioner) retired from the U.S. Air Force on May 1, 1970. Since retiring, petitioner has received 10-percent disability pay from the Air Force. In 1977, petitioner received from the Air Force gross retirement pay in the amount of $ 13,653.96. Of this amount, petitioner's W-2P Form for 1977 shows that he received a taxable amount of $ 10,886.84 from which Federal income tax was withheld in the amount of $ 1,152.39. *138 *139 total reported income of $ 30,765.59.
Petitioner was not permanently and totally disabled on May 1, 1970, the date of his retirement, or on January 1, 1976, or on January 1, 1977. Petitioner, on his Federal income tax return, claimed a "Disability income exclusion (sick pay) (attach Form 2440)" of $ 5,220. A copy of petitioner's retirement order dated March 11, 1970, was attached to his 1977 Federal income tax return. This order showed that petitioner was retired "per
Pursuant to the provisions of
Respondent in his notice of deficiency disallowed*140 the claimed exclusion of $ 5,220 with a statement that it was disallowed --
because you did not submit form 2440. Enclosed is a form 2440 for disability exclusion. You must be permanent [sic] and totally disabled to qualify for the exclusion. The bottom part of the 2440 must be completed by your physician.
It is petitioner's position that, since he was retired because of physical disability to perform the duties of his rank, he should be entitled to the disability income exclusion. He further argues that, since he had been allowed a sick pay exclusion of $ 100 per week for all years prior to 1977 following his retirement in 1970, he should be allowed this same exclusion in 1977. *141 It is respondent's position that
(d) Wage Continuation Plans. -- Gross income does not include amounts referred to in subsection (a) if such amounts constitute wages or payments in lieu of wages for a period during which the employee is absent from work on account of personal injuries or sickness; but this subsection shall not apply to the extent that such amounts exceed a weekly rate of $ 100. * * *
As originally enacted, the amendment to
*143 The report of the Senate Finance Committee on Pub. L. 95-30, S. Rept. 95-66 (1977),
Although the Tax Reform Act of 1976 did not become law until October 4, 1976, the revisions in the sick pay exclusion were made applicable back to January 1, 1976. Even though the House version of the tax reform bill, which passed on December 4, 1975, changed the sick pay provision prospectively (by applying the revisions to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1975), most of the taxpayers affected by the change were not aware of it. Consequently, many taxpayers were surprised to learn, at the end of 1976 or early in 1977, that the sick pay exclusion was not available for 1976. For many of these taxpayers this change meant a large and unexpected final tax payment with their 1976 returns. For many taxpayers retired on disability pensions, such a large unanticipated cash payment represented a serious hardship. The committee believes that individual taxpayers should be given more advance warning when a change of this magnitude is made.
*705 *144
The bill generally changes the effective date of the sick pay exclusion made by the Tax Reform Act of 1976 from taxable years beginning after December 31, 1975, to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1976.
It is clear, not only from the provisions of
Section 505(c) of Pub. L. 94-455 provided for a transitional rule which brought a person who had retired prior to January 1, 1976 (changed by sec. 301(b) of Pub. L. 95-30 to Jan. 1, 1977), within the provisions of
The committee amendment also provides a transitional rule allowing persons who, *145 before January 1, 1976, retire on disability or who were entitled to retire on disability, and on January 1, 1976, were permanently and totally disabled (though they may not have been permanently and totally disabled on their retirement date) to claim a disability income exclusion if they otherwise qualify.
This provision further shows the intent of Congress that
The law is so clear that
(b)
*706 The law under which petitioner had been claiming a disability pay or sick pay exclusion since his retirement in 1970 was amended by the Tax Reform Act of 1976, and the new
Having decided that petitioner is not entitled to claim the exclusion provided for by
1. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended and in effect during the years here in issue, unless otherwise stated.↩
2. During the course of opening statements at the trial, petitioner stated that he also received a payment from the Veterans' Administration. However, any amount petitioner might have received from the Veterans' Administration is not in issue in this case, and our findings with respect to petitioner's gross retirement pay and the taxable amount of such pay are exactly as stipulated by the parties.↩
3.
Upon a determination by the Secretary concerned that a member of a regular component of the armed forces entitled to basic pay, or any other member of the armed forces entitled to basic pay who has been called or ordered to active duty (other than for training under
(1) based upon accepted medical principles, the disability is of a permanent nature;
(2) the disability is not the result of the member's intentional misconduct or willful neglect, and was not incurred during a period of unauthorized absence; and
(3) either --
(A) the member has at least 20 years of service computed under
(B) the disability is at least 30 percent under the standard schedule of rating disabilities in use by the Veterans' Administration at the time of the determination * * *↩
4.
(d) Certain Disability Payments. -- (1) In general. -- In the case of a taxpayer who -- (A) has not attained age 65 before the close of the taxable year, and (B) retired on disability and, when he retired, was permanently and totally disabled, gross income does not include amounts referred to in subsection (a) if such amounts constitute wages or payments in lieu of wages for a period during which the employee is absent from work on account of permanent and total disability. (2) Limitation. -- This subsection shall not apply to the extent that the amounts referred to in paragraph (1) exceed a weekly rate of $ 100. (3) Phaseout over $ 15,000. -- If the adjusted gross income of the taxpayer for the taxable year (determined without regard to this subsection) exceeds $ 15,000, the amount which but for this paragraph would be excluded under this subsection for the taxable year shall be reduced by an amount equal to the excess of the adjusted gross income (as so determined) over $ 15,000. * * * * (5) Permanent and total disability defined. -- For purposes of this subsection, an individual is permanently and totally disabled if he is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months. An individual shall not be considered to be permanently and totally disabled unless he furnishes proof of the existence thereof in such form and manner, and at such times, as the Secretary may require.↩