DocketNumber: Docket No. 4012-92
Judges: Tannenwald
Filed Date: 10/27/1993
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024
*65
Petitioner was required to change to a calendar tax year by
*359 OPINION
TANNENWALD,
On that return petitioner annualized its taxable income as follows:
Short period 9/1/88 - | Annualization | Annualization | |
Income | 12/31/88 | factor | amount |
Clinic fees | $ 168,053 | 12/4 | $ 504,159 |
Miscellaneous | 49 | 12/4 | 147 |
Columbia Cardiology | |||
Associates: | |||
Operating loss | (3,176) | ||
Guaranteed | |||
payments | 202,509 | ||
Interest | 955 | ||
Total income | 704,594 | ||
Total expenses | 250,026 | 12/4 | 750,078 |
Annualized income (loss) | (45,484) |
*361 Respondent determined petitioner's annualized income as follows:
Short period 9/1/88 - | Annualization | Annualization | |
Income | 12/31/88 | factor | amount |
Clinic fees | $ 168,065 | 12/4 | $ 504,195 |
Miscellaneous | 49 | 12/4 | 147 |
Columbia Cardiology | |||
Associates: | |||
Operating loss | (3,176) | 12/4 | (9,528) |
Guaranteed | |||
payments | 202,509 | 12/4 | 607,527 |
Interest | 955 | 12/4 | 2,865 |
Total income | 1,105,206 | ||
Total expenses (per | |||
return -- $ 250,026 less | |||
adjustments 3,134) | 246,892 | 12/4 | 740,676 |
Total | 364,530 |
*68 At issue is whether petitioner was required to annualize the partnership items.
(1) GENERAL RULE. -- * * * the taxable income for the short period shall be placed on an annual basis by multiplying the modified taxable income for such short period by 12, dividing the result by the number of months in the short period. The tax shall be the same part of the tax computed on the annual basis as the number of months in the short period is of 12 months. *69 to the partnership represent the partnership's activities over a 12-month period ending December 31, 1988, the requirement of annualization is satisfied by simply including in gross income the amounts shown as distributions on the partnership's tax return. According to petitioner, requiring it to annualize the 12-month financial consequences of the partnership in effect taxes 36 months of income in violation of the regulations under
*362 Respondent's position is that sections 706 and 707 require a partner to include in gross income the distributions of the partnership as of the close of the taxable year of the partnership ending with or within the partner's taxable year, in this case the distributions of the partnership for its taxable year ending December 31, 1988. As a result, respondent asserts that all the distributions in question must be annualized under
Section 706(a) provides:
SEC. 706(a). YEAR IN WHICH PARTNERSHIP*70 INCOME IS INCLUDIBLE. -- In computing the taxable income of a partner for a taxable year, the inclusions required by section 702 and section 707(c) with respect to a partnership shall be based on the income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit of the partnership for any taxable year of the partnership ending within or with the taxable year of the partner.
The statutory mandate is reflected as follows in
(a) Year in which partnership income is includible. -- (1) In computing his taxable income for a taxable year, a partner is required to include his distributive share of partnership items set forth in section 702 for any partnership year ending within or with his taxable year.
Section 707(c) provides:
SEC. 707(c). GUARANTEED PAYMENTS. -- To the extent determined without regard to the income of the partnership, payments to a partner for services or the use of capital shall be considered as made to one who is not *71 a member of the partnership, but only for the purposes of section 61(a) (relating to gross income) and, subject to section 263, for purposes of section 162(a) (relating to trade or business expenses).
This statutory mandate is reflected as follows in
(c) Guaranteed payments. -- Payments made by a partnership to a partner for services or for the use of capital are considered as made to a person who is not a partner, to the extent such payments are determined without regard to the income of the partnership.
Petitioner's argument is directed primarily to the guaranteed payments, which appear to have been made*72 as compensation for services furnished by petitioner. On this basis, petitioner contends, in the alternative, that, even if we accept respondent's position as to the necessity for annualization of the partnership items in question, the guaranteed payment item should be limited to the amount of the guaranteed payments actually received by petitioner during the short period.
The impact of these provisions has been considered on several occasions involving partnership distributions, including guaranteed payments, and the courts have uniformly held *364 that the amount to be annualized is the entire distributive share of the taxpayer partner for the*74 taxable year of the partnership ending within or with the short period, despite the high tax that can result.
Petitioner's argument that respondent taxes 36 months of income is without merit. The annualization by respondent simply has the effect of determining the applicable tax rate, i.e., bracket, but the tax itself is prorated based on the number of months in the short period. Cf.
The hard fact is that the plain language of
In sum, based on the language of the applicable statutory provisions, the legislative history, and the decided cases, we sustain respondent's position in respect of petitioner's annualization of the partnership items.
In order to take into account the concessions of the parties on other issues,
1. All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the periods in issue. All Rules references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
2.
For purposes of this subsection the term "modified taxable income" means, with respect to any period, the gross income for such period minus the deductions allowed by this chapter for such period (but, in the case of a short period, only the adjusted amount of the deductions for personal exemptions).↩
3. The stipulation of facts does not set forth the amount of such payments, but petitioner has utilized the figure of $ 79,972 on brief, and respondent has interposed no objection.↩
4. See also