DocketNumber: Docket No. 442-80.
Citation Numbers: 41 T.C.M. 1115, 1981 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 623, 1981 T.C. Memo. 124
Filed Date: 3/17/1981
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/20/2020
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
FAY, Date Entry Balance For 10-30-75 ($ 5,000.00) ($ 5,000.00) Personal income given to corporation 10-30-75 ( 3,000.00) ( 8,000.00) Personal income given to corporation 12-30-75 ( 6,059.77) (14,059.77) Corporate expenses paid by Mr. Oller 8-3-76 13.36 Corporate income given to Mr. Oller 9-1-76 ( 2,858.96) Corporate expenses paid by Mr. Oller Oller 9-1-76 1,250.00 (15,655.37) Corporate income given to Mr. 12-31-76 15,655.37 00 Close out books
Oller Co. was nearly defunct during 1976, and in early 1977 the company's last opportunities evaported. Petitioner's investment in Oller Co. became totally worthless in 1977.
On petitioner's 1976 tax return he wrote off his $ 500 original investment in Oller*627 Co. as a capital loss and deducted $ 15,655.37, the amount of his outstanding loans to Oller Co., as a business bad debt which became worthless during the taxable year. This bad debt deduction contributed to a substantial net operating loss for 1976 which petitioner carried back to 1973.
Petitioner was in the oil and gas business in 1973 and 1976. He owned oil and gas leases which were developed and operated by third parties, and with respect to which petitioner received a share of both profits and losses. This activity continued into 1977. On his returns for both 1973 and 1976, petitioner reported his income and losses from oil and gas as having been incurred in a trade or business, and he computed his self-employment tax liability accordingly. On his 1977 tax return, petitioner reported his oil and gas income and expenses as "royalties," and he did not report or pay self-employment tax.
In his statutory notice, respondent disallowed petitioners' 1976 bad debt deduction, thereby reducing petitioners' net operating loss carryback to 1973. Instead, respondent determined petitioners were entitled to capital losses in 1977, subject to the capital loss limitation provisions of*628 section 1211(b). Respondent also determined petitioner Frank G. Oller was liable for self-employment tax in 1977.
OPINION
The issues presented are whether petitioners are entitled to a bad debt deduction under section 166 and whether petitioner-husband is liable for the tax on self-employment income imposed by section 1401 for his 1977 taxable year.
The first question, the bad debt deduction, requires us to determine whether petitioner's advances to Oller Co. must be treated as loans or as contributions to capital.
The evidence leaves little doubt petitioner's advances to Oller Co. constituted venture capital. At trial, petitioner forthrightly admitted that Oller Co. was financially weak and undercapitalized when the advances were made, that he expected repayment only in the event Oller Co. operated profitably, and that Oller Co. had extremely limited prospects. *630 162. Sec. 1402(a), (c), and (d);
The record is woefully inadequate as to petitioner's exact status in the oil and gas business in 1977. What is clear is that petitioner has fallen far short of meeting his burden to prove he was not in that trade or business. Accordingly, respondent's determination is sustained. See
Finally, at trial petitioner moved to amend his pleadings to claim an additional deduction for moving expenses allegedly incurred in 1976. However, there was initially some question whether we had jurisdiction to determine the issue, no deficiency having been determined for 1976, and whether petitioner's claim was barred by the statute of limitations. Respondent's counsel agreed to leave the matter open and to consider petitioner's claim on the merits in the event*631 the claim was not time-barred. We find petitioner's additional claim for 1976 is not time-barred and may properly be raised in this action.
In
To reflect the foregoing,
1. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended and in effect for the years in issue.↩
2. We have also considered the possibility petitioner considered himself, in effect, a guarantor of Oller Co.'s debts, but the record before us is simply insufficient to support such a finding.↩
3. See also sec. 6214(b).↩