DocketNumber: Docket No. 12694-88
Filed Date: 9/14/1989
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/20/2020
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCOTT,
OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE
GALLOWAY,
Respondent mailed a notice of deficiency to petitioner on March 4, 1988, with respect to the 1985 tax year. Petitioner was a resident of Travis Air Force Base, California, when he filed his petition with this Court.
In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's Federal income tax and additions to tax in the following amounts:
Additions To Tax, Secs: | ||||||
Year | Deficiency | 6651(a)(1) | 6653(a)(1) | 6653(a)(2) | 6654(a) | 6661(a) |
1985 | $ 13,997.00 | $ 2,450.50 | $ 699.85 | 1 | $ 578.46 | $ 3,499.25 |
*509 Respondent's determination was based on the following adjustments: (1) petitioner's failure to report on a timely filed tax return wage income received from the U.S. Air Force and Mare Island Naval Station in the respective amounts of $ 7,685 and $ 39,017; and (2) the additions to tax set forth above.
Petitioner has previously filed two petitions in this Court challenging respondent's determination of the same issues before us for consideration in this proceeding, i.e., unreported wages and the same additions to tax as determined above. In docket No. 3335-85, with respect to the years 1981 and 1982, the principal adjustments to income were unreported wages and other income, dependency exemptions, and additions to tax. Respondent filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to these issues. Respondent also requested damages pursuant to
Upon trial of the case, we sustained respondent's determination that petitioner had not shown he provided over half of the support for*510 his daughters in the taxable years. We also awarded damages to respondent for petitioner's abusing the process of this Court and wasting the resources of this Court and those of respondent. See
Docket No. 14137-87 also concerned substantial omissions of unreported wage income by petitioner for the years 1983 and 1984, and additions to tax. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and a motion for damages under
No useful purpose would be served in extended discussion of petitioner's contentions contained in his present petition to this Court under consideration with respect to the 1985 year. Cf.
Rule 34(b)(4) provides that a petition filed in this Court shall contain clear and concise assignments of each and every error which petitioner alleges to have been committed by respondent in the determination of the deficiency and additions to tax in dispute. Rule 34(b)(5) provides that the petition shall contain clear and concise lettered statements of the facts on which petitioner bases the assignments of error. No justiciable error has been alleged in the petition filed by petitioner.
Rule 40 provides that a party may file a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Generally, we may dismiss a petition for failure to state*512 a claim upon respondent's motion when it appears beyond doubt that the taxpayer can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.
The determinations made by respondent in his notice of deficiency are presumed correct.
With respect to respondent's motion for an award of damages,
Whenever it appears to the Tax Court that proceedings before it have been instituted or maintained by the taxpayer primarily for delay, that the taxpayer's position in*513 such proceeding is frivolous or groundless, * * * damages in an amount not in excess of $ 5,000 shall be awarded to the United States by the Tax Court in its decision. * * *
We find that the petition in this case is frivolous and groundless and was filed primarily for delay. Accordingly, we will grant respondent's motion and award damages to the United States in the amount of $ 5,000.
1. All subsequent section numbers refer to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable year in issue. All rule numbers refer to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
1. 50 percent of the interest payable under section 6601 with respect to the portion of the underpayment attributable to negligence or intentional disregard of rules and regulations.↩