DocketNumber: Docket No. 26022-91
Filed Date: 2/1/1993
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/20/2020
*45 Decision will be entered for respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GUSSIS,
Respondent determined the following income tax deficiencies and additions to tax:
Additions to Tax | ||||
Sec. | Sec. | Sec. | ||
Year | Deficiency | 6651(a)(1) | 6653(a)(1)(A) | 6653(a)(1)(B) |
1986 | $ 767 | $ 191.75 | $ 38.35 | 50% of the |
interest due | ||||
on $ 767 | ||||
1987 | 472 | 118.00 | 23.60 | 50% of the |
interest due | ||||
on $ 472 |
Respondent determined that payments in the amounts of $ 9,339 and $ 8,067 received by petitioner from Memphis State University in the years 1986 and 1987, respectively, were includable in gross income for those years. In his petition, petitioner alleged that the payments were excludable from income as scholarships under section 117. In a case involving a prior year, this Court held that payments to petitioner, *46 a teaching assistant from Memphis State University, were not excludable under section 117. See
The remaining issues are: (1) Whether the years 1986 and 1987 are barred by the statute of limitations under section 6501; (2) whether petitioner is liable for additions to tax in 1986 and 1987 under section 6651(a)(1) for failure to file timely returns; and (3) whether petitioner is liable for additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1)(A) and (B) in 1986 and 1987.
Petitioner was a resident of Memphis, Tennessee, at the time the petition herein was filed.
Petitioner argues that the years 1986 and 1987 are barred by the statute of limitations pursuant to section 6501. The notices of deficiency for the taxable years 1986 and 1987 were both issued by respondent on August 5, 1991. Respondent contends that petitioner failed to file income tax returns for the years*47 1986 and 1987 and that, consequently, the tax for those years may be assessed at any time.
Section 6501(a) generally provides that an income tax tax must be assessed within 3 years after the return was filed. However, section 6501(c)(3) provides that if no return is filed, the tax may be assessed, or a proceeding in court for the collection of such tax may be begun without assessment, at any time. An Internal Revenue Service certificate of lack of record dated June 12, 1992, which is in evidence, indicates that no return was filed by petitioner for the years 1986 and 1987. Petitioner's contention that he did, in fact, file timely returns for both years is unsupported by the record. His testimony in this respect was sketchy and singularly vague. He was unable to produce any evidence of the actual mailing of the purported returns. He offered no evidence concerning the dates of mailing or the circumstances attendant upon the mailing. On this record, we are unable to find that petitioner filed the appropriate returns for the years 1986 and 1987. Moreover, it is established that the filing of an invalid return does not start the running of the statute of limitations.
Section 6651(a)(1) imposes an addition*49 to tax for failure to file a timely return unless the taxpayer shows that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. Petitioner has the burden of proof. Rule 142(a). We have found above that petitioner failed to file tax returns for the taxable years 1986 and 1987. Petitioner offered no satisfactory explanation for such failure to file valid returns for the years at issue. Petitioner has failed to meet the requisite burden of proof. On this record, we must conclude that petitioner is liable for the additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) for failure to file timely returns for the years 1986 and 1987.
Section 6653(a)(1)(A) provides that if any part of any underpayment of tax is due to negligence, there shall be added to the tax an amount equal to 5 percent of the amount of the underpayment. Section 6653(a)(1)(B) provides that there shall also be added to the tax an amount equal to 50 percent of the interest payable under section 6601 with respect to the portion of such underpayment which is attributable to negligence. Petitioner has the burden of proof. Rule 142(a);