DocketNumber: Docket No. 25183-88.
Citation Numbers: 57 T.C.M. 285, 1989 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 204, 1989 T.C. Memo. 204
Filed Date: 5/1/1989
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/20/2020
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCOTT,
OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE
GUSSIS,
Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income taxes and additions to tax as follows:
Additions to Tax | |||||
Year | Deficiency | Sec. 6651 | Sec. 6653(a)(1) | Sec. 6653(a)(2) | Sec. 6654 |
1983 | $ 8,052 | $ 1,987 | $ 403 | * | $ 405 |
1984 | 6,435 | 1,609 | 322 | ** | 405 |
1985 | 43,579 | 10,794 | 2,179 | *** | 2,486 |
1986 | 10,159 | 2,540 | 508 | **** | 491 |
Petitioner was a resident of Soldotna, Alaska at the time the petition herein was filed. The deficiencies are based on respondent's determination that petitioner*207 failed to report various items of taxable income in the years involved, including wages, interest income, gross receipts from self-employment, dividends and unemployment compensation. Petitioner failed to raise any issues in his assignment of error within the meaning of Rule 34(b). Rule 34(b) requires that the petition shall contain "Clear and concise assignments of each and every error which the petitioner alleges to have been committed by the Commissioner in the determination of the deficiency or liability" and "Clear and concise lettered statements of the facts on which petitioner bases the assignments of error." The petition filed herein alleges no justiciable error with respect to respondent's determination and no justiciable facts in support thereof. Petitioner has the burden of showing error in respondent's determination of deficiencies and additions to tax.
Petitioner expounds contentions and irrelevant legal theories which are utterly lacking in merit and which have been repeatedly rejected. It is settled that the Federal income tax laws are constitutional, and since the ratification of the
We next consider whether damages should be awarded to the United States under section 6673, which section provides an award for damages to the United States in an amount not in excess of $ 5,000 when it appears to the Tax Court that proceedings before it have been instituted or maintained primarily for delay, that the taxpayer's position in such proceeding is frivolous or groundless, or that the taxpayer unreasonably failed to pursue available administrative remedies. See
1. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended and in effect during the years at issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
*. 50 percent of the interest due on the underpayment of $ 8,052 attributable to negligence
** 50 percent of the interest due on the underpayment of $ 6,435 attributable to negligence
*** 50 percent of the interest due on the underpayment of $ 43,579 attributable to negligence
**** 50 percent of the interest due on the underpayment of $ 10,159 attributable to negligence↩
Eugene M. Lonsdale, Sr. And Patsy R. Lonsdale v. ... , 661 F.2d 71 ( 1981 )
Lavern Scherping v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 747 F.2d 478 ( 1984 )
Norman E. McCoy and Mary Louise McCoy v. Commissioner of ... , 696 F.2d 1234 ( 1983 )
William H. Reading and Beverly S. Reading v. Commissioner ... , 614 F.2d 159 ( 1980 )
Richard J. Sydnes v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 647 F.2d 813 ( 1981 )
Eisner v. MacOmber , 252 U.S. 189 ( 1920 )
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad , 36 S. Ct. 236 ( 1916 )