DocketNumber: Docket No. 9178-76.
Citation Numbers: 38 T.C.M. 721, 1979 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 357, 1979 T.C. Memo. 168
Filed Date: 4/30/1979
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/20/2020
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HALL,
The sole issue for our consideration at this time is whether Louis R. DeNiro, Frank DeNiro, and Michael A. DeNiro ("petitioners") are liable as transferees of the Estate of Vincent DeNiro for the 1969 income tax deficiency, if any, of the Estate.
At the1979 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 357">*359 time of filing their petition, petitioners were residents of Youngstown, Ohio.
Vincent DeNiro ("Vincent") died intestate, a resident of Ohio, on July 17, 1961. At the time on his death Vincent was single, and his heirs at law were two minor children of a previously dissolved marriage. Vincent was also survived by three brothers, the petitioners herein. There were no probate proceedings and no personal representatives were initially appointed. No federal estate tax return or Ohio inheritance tax return was filed.
On the date of his death, Vincent owned 100 percent of the issued and outstanding stock of Cicero's, Inc., 100 percent of the stock of Valley Land Company and at least 55 percent of the stock of National Cigarette Service of Youngstown, Inc. He also owned 20,000 shares of stock in Continental Tobaco Company, $25,000 in cash and was owed an additional $25,000 by an unrelated individual.
On August 23, 1965, the three DeNiro brothers were convicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio of willfully attempting to evade and defeat federal estate tax owned by the Estate.
On April 4, 1969, respondent filed jeopardy assessments against the three DeNiro brothers as "nominees or transferees" of the Estate. Liens were recorded by respondent against all the assets of National Cigarette Service of Youngstown, Inc. and Valley Land Company. Subsequently, there was a partial abatement of the jeopardy assessments and the amount remaining after abatement, $104,577.04, 1979 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 357">*361 was paid by the two corporations in 1969. After claims for refund were denied, a refund action was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio by the two corporations and the DeNiro brothers as "nominees and/or transferees." Finding that the Court had no jurisdiction over a claim by the corporations, the District Judge dismissed the corporations as plaintiffs in the suit. The jury for the case found the value of Vincent's estate to be less then the government claimed and a judgment for refund was entered for the DeNiro Brothers.
The government appealed the judgment. The issues on appeal related to the standing of the DeNiro brothers to maintain the refund action, the sufficiency of the evidence upon which the jury determined the taxable estate, and the allowance by the District Court of litigation expenses as a further reduction of the taxable estate. The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in
On remand, the District Court in
In light of the opinions rendered by the District Court for the Northern District of Ohio and the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in matters related to this case, petitioners contend that they are not liable as transferees for any 1969 income tax of the Estate that may be due because the transfer of assets to them from the Estate occurred
Respondent has determined in a notice of deficiency, that the Estate of Vincent DeNiro (the "Estate") is liable for an income tax deficiency of $46,268.20 for 1969, plus an addition to the tax for failure to file an income tax return under section 6651(a)(1) 2 of $11,567.05. 1979 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 357">*364 Respondent determined that $104,577.04 was constructively received by the Estate in 1969 when the federal estate tax due by the Estate was paid by Vincent DeNiro's corporations. Respondent determined that this amount was taxable as ordinary income under sections 641 and 61. In statutory notices sent to Louis R. DeNiro, Frank DeNiro and Michael DeNiro as "transferees" respondent asserted that each is liable for the $46,268.20 deficiency plus additions to the tax for failure to file of $11,567.05 as transferees of the assets of the Estate. The liability of the Estate as transferor for the deficiency and penalties has not been decided.
Section 6901 3 provides a method of collecting from a transferee amounts owned for the tax deficiencies of the transferor. For transferee liability to exist under section 6901(a)(1)(A) there must be a transfer of assets which was made
1979 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 357">*366 Accordingly, petitioners' motion is granted and,
1. At the January 31, 1978 hearing on this motion counsel for Louis R. DeNiro, Frank DeNiro and Michael A. DeNiro stated that he was not counsel for the Estate of Vincent DeNiro.↩
2. All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as in effect during the year in issue.↩
3. Section 6901 provides:
(a) Method of Collection.--The amounts of the following liabilities shall, except as hereinafter in this section provided, be assessed, paid and collected in the same manner and subject to the same provisions and limitations as in the case of the taxes with respect to which the liabilities were incurred:
(1) Income, estate and gift taxes.--
(A) Transferees.--The liability, at law or in equity, of a transferee of property--
(i) of a taxpayer in the case of a tax imposed by subtitle A (relating to income taxes), * * * in respect of the tax imposed by subtitle A or B.↩
elaine-yagoda-formerly-elaine-drechsler-v-commissioner-of-internal , 331 F.2d 485 ( 1964 )
Baker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 81 F.2d 741 ( 1936 )
United States v. Frank Deniro, Jr., United States of ... , 392 F.2d 753 ( 1968 )
Louis Deniro, Frank Deniro and Michael Deniro v. United ... , 561 F.2d 653 ( 1977 )
Commissioner of Int. Rev. v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. , 102 F.2d 397 ( 1939 )