DocketNumber: Docket No. 27595-92
Citation Numbers: 68 T.C.M. 641, 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 448, 1994 T.C. Memo. 440
Filed Date: 8/29/1994
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/21/2020
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GOLDBERG,
The notices of deficiency attached to the petition filed December 14, 1992, are each dated September 24, 1992. One notice sets forth the deficiency determined by respondent with respect to petitioners' taxable years 1987, 1988, and 1989, inclusive. The other notice contains the deficiency determination by respondent with respect to petitioners' taxable years 1984 and 1985. Attached to the notices were the following:
Form 870, Increase (Decrease) in Tax and Penalties
Statement - Income Tax Changes
Schedules numbered 1 through 12, inclusive
Schedules (A) and (B)
Form 870, Increase (Decrease) in Tax and Penalties
Statement - Income Tax Changes
Schedules 1 through 11, inclusive
Schedules (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), and (G)
We will refer to the notice of deficiency for the taxable years 1987, 1988, and 1989, and all attached schedules, collectively as "notice #1", and refer to the notice of deficiency for the taxable years 1984 and 1985 and all attached schedules, collectively as "notice #2".
In notice #1 respondent disallowed expense deductions claimed by petitioners on their 1987 income*450 tax return resulting in a determination by respondent that petitioners had not sustained a net operating loss for 1987. Consequently, respondent determined in notice #2 that there were no net operating loss carrybacks to 1984 and 1985 (the carryback years). The computational schedules attached to notice #1 reflect several adjustments for 1987, but in notice #2, only one adjustment for 1984, in the amount of $ 34,198, described as "Net Operating Loss C/B from 1987". The adjustments for 1985 include an adjustment in the amount of $ 11,985, also described as "Net Operating Loss C/B from 1987", and an adjustment in the amount of $ 4,199 described as "ITC carryback" from 1987. The treatment of the carryback years in notice #2 reflects that the deficiencies for those years arose from the disallowance of the 1987 net operating loss and investment tax credit carrybacks.
In their petition filed on December 14, 1992, petitioners specifically placed in dispute the deficiencies determined by respondent in notice #1 for the 1987, 1988, and 1989 taxable years (paragraph 5 of the petition). The deficiencies determined by respondent for 1984 and 1985 in notice #2 were not specified in paragraph*451 5 of the petition; however, petitioners did make reference to the 1984 and 1985 taxable years in the next paragraph in setting forth their assignments of error, as follows: 6. The determination of tax set forth in the said Notice of Deficiencies is base [sic] upon the following errors: (a) The Commissioner erred in disallowing the Investment Tax Credit carryback allocated to the Petitioners from their Partnership, in the amount of $ 4,199.00 for the tax year ended December 31, 1985. (b) The Commissioner erred in disallowing the NOL carryforward allocated to the Petitioners from their partnership to 1987 in the amount of $ 34,198.00 for the tax year ending December 31, 1984 and in the amount of $ 11,985 for the tax year ending December 31, 1985.
Respondent's answer admitted that the 1987, 1988, and 1989 taxable years were in dispute, but made no specific mention of the taxable years 1984 and 1985. In the prayer, respondent requested that her deficiency determination "as set forth in the notice of deficiency" be in all respects approved.
In their motion, petitioners allege that they intended to contest the net operating loss and investment tax credit carrybacks to 1984*452 and 1985, resulting in deficiencies for these years, and that their failure to more specifically enumerate or reference the carryback years was inadvertent. In her Notice of Objection, respondent contends that petitioners did not timely petition the carryback years and that this Court lacks jurisdiction, leaving petitioners without a remedy in this Court.
It has been this Court's policy to be liberal in treating as petitions all documents filed by taxpayers within *453 the 90-day period, where the documents were intended as petitions.
Respondent relies upon
Here, although petitioners' intention to seek a redetermination for the taxable years 1984 and 1985 was not set forth concisely and the language of their petition is inartful, we conclude that the petition, considered in its entirety together with the attached notices of deficiency, reflects the intent to place in issue the carryback years 1984 and 1985.*455 notice #2, and the numerous schedules detailing calculations relating to the carryback years were attached to the petition. See
*456 We also are not persuaded that petitioners' failure to strictly comply with Rule 34(b) deprives us of jurisdiction over the carryback years. Our Rules are promulgated to provide procedural guidance and are not intended to deny judicial review authorized by sections 7442 and 6213.
Under the circumstances of this case, petitioners' motion to amend their petition will be granted.
*457 To reflect the foregoing,
1. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
2. We assume that under respondent's position, petitioners would be able to sue for a refund after payment of the tax for 1984 and 1985, and that the forum for doing so would be in the United States District Court or U.S. Court of Federal Claims.↩
3. In
4. Although amendment of the petition is unnecessary from a jurisdictional standpoint, it may be helpful to permit the parties to more concisely frame the issues and amounts in dispute.↩