DocketNumber: Docket No. 11595-78.
Citation Numbers: 41 T.C.M. 704, 1981 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 732, 1981 T.C. Memo. 12
Filed Date: 1/12/1981
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/21/2020
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
FORRESTER,
FINDINGS OF FACT
Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.
Petitioner, Record Wide Distributors, Inc., is a Missouri Corporation with its principal place of business in Fenton, Missoui. It timely filed its U.S. Corporation Income Tax Returns, Form 1120, for the calendar years 1972, 1973, and 1974 with the Internal Revenue Service Center at Kansas City, Missouri.
Petitioner was incorporated on March 7, 1972, prior to which the business was operated as a sole proprietorship known as Bootheel Records by Gayron Lytle. During the years in issue Gayron Lytle owned 100% of the stock of petitioner and was its president. His brother, Randall, was vice president and petitioner's managing officer during those years.
Petitioner is a wholesaler in the business of selling phonograph records, 8-track tapes, and cassette tapes to wholesalers and retailers. The bulk of the merchandise sold by it are cut outs. Cut outs*735 are budget products which the manufacturer has not been able to sell in its market. The petitioner assembles cut outs into lots of varying size and then ships them to retailers for sale at highly discounted prices. The nature of cut outs, being less marketable, makes it virtually impossible for a retailer to determine to what extent a given lot of records or tapes will be sold. For this reason petitioner guaranteed its customers that they could return any unsold items for full credit. There are no written contracts between petitioner and its customers, but petitioner has been profitable notwithstanding.
Petitioner's policy has been not to require any payment for records and tapes until the retailer had sold all of the product that it could and returned the unsold merchandise. Although petitioner has a policy whereby it encourages returns and payments within 120 days of shipment, it often does not receive payments and returns for well over 120 days, sometimes even over a year. At the time petitioner shipped goods to a customer an invoice was sent along showing the amount, description, and price of the items sold. Petitioner has historically experienced returns of between 50*736 and 60 percent. Of the goods shipped by petitioner in any taxable year 30-35 percent of the returns with respect thereto were received by petitioner in a later taxable year (usually within the first 4 months).
One of petitioner's major customers was Sound On Tape Distributors, Inc., a wholesaler of 8-track tapes (hereinafter Sound On). Petitioner maintained the same return policy with Sound On that it did with its other customers. Until 1974 Sound On dealt heavily in what are known as bootleg, duplicate, or counterfeit tapes. In February 1974 Sound On was enjoined from selling such tapes. As a result, Sound On's inventory was nearly worthless and it returned the tapes to petitioner. After crediting Sound On for these returns Sound On owed petitioner $ 176,574.22. Although Sound On's financial position was unstable its management attempted to salvage the business. Petitioner no longer extended Sound On credit after 1974 but required payments (including return credit) at least equal to the amount of merchandise shipped prior to or at the time of shipment. Several of Sound On's checks bounced. Thus, starting in 1976, petitioner required cash only upon delivery.
In 1978 petitioner*737 and Sound On executed an agreement settling the latter's outstanding debt which had been reduced to the principal amount of $ 161,000 owed to petitioner, for $ 5,000. Sound On ceased doing business shortly after the execution of this agreement. On its books petitioner wrote off the uncollected Sound On debt in 1978, however, it has never been written off for Federal income tax purposes.
During the years in issue, and before, petitioner operated on a hybrid method of accounting. It maintained an inventory on its books for determining its cost of sales 1 but determined its sales on the cash basis. That is, petitioner posted sales only as it received cash. Furthermore, petitioner did not include goods received from the manufacturer but not paid for on its Schedule A as "Merchandise bought for Manufacturer or Sale."
Respondent has determined that petitioner's method of reporting income from sales, i.e., the cash receipts and disbursements method, does not clearly reflect income*738 and that an accrual method of accounting does clearly reflect income. Consequently, respondent increased petitioner's income for taxable years 1972, 1973, and 1974 by $ 191,775.41, $ 71,759.47, and $ 44,233.93, respectively. 2
OPINION
Petitioner's primary contention is that its hybrid method of accounting and reporting income during the years in issue was consistent with its unique method of doing business since prior to the time of its incorporation. Furthermore, it argues that its methods clearly reflect income and are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Respondent maintains that since petitioner must keep inventories for each taxable year in issue 3 it must report purchases and sales using an accrual method of accounting. 4
*739
*740 Where one's method of accounting does not, in the opinion of the Commissioner, clearly reflect income the respondent may require the use of such method as does clearly reflect income.
In his deficiency notice respondent determined that petitioner's computation of its income on the cash receipts and disbursements method does not clearly reflect income. Petitioner does not dispute that it must maintain inventories since the sale of merchandise is a principal income-producing factor of its business. See
Alternatively, petitioner maintains that if it is required to report income on an accrual method of accounting it should nonetheless not report income until cash is received because, in light of its return policy, all events had not occurred which establish its right to receive any certain amount of income. We do not dispute that income is to be included only when all the events*743 have occurred which fix the petitioner's right to receive such income and the amount thereof is determinable with reasonable accuracy.
*745 The final issue for our decision is whether petitioner is entitled to a bad debt deduction for the debt of Sound On in 1974. Petitioner asserts that due to the prohibition against the sale by Sound On of duplicate tapes in 1974 it (Sound On) was ruined financially, rendering its debt owed to petitioner worthless at that time. Petitioner bases this conclusion on the fact that Sound On's only assets were worthless inventory and tape racks and that if Sound On had liquidated in 1974 the bulk of its accounts payable to petitioner could not have been paid.
It is respondent's position that the debt owed to petitioner by Sound On did not become worthless until 1978 at which time Sound On ceased doing business and at which time petitioner settled its account with Sound On for $ 5,000.
*747 Alternatively, petitioner on brief asserts that Sound On's debt became partially worthless in 1974. Respondent maintains that "the Commissioner
We need not consider whether under circumstances where the respondent changes the petitioner's method of accounting from cash basis to an accrual basis, the petitioner should be allowed to retroactively charge off some part of a debt which became worthless in a prior year and which would have been charged off had the petitioner consistently maintained an accrual method*748 of accounting. 12 This Court has long taken the position that
*749 Because of certain concessions of the parties regarding accounts payable and the deductibility of bad debits,
1. Petitioner's inventory at the end of a taxable year included only those items situate in its warehouse. None of the records and tapes in the hands of its customers were included in its inventory.↩
2. These adjustments are as reflected in respondent's deficiency notice. Since that time respondent has made certain concessions, the effect of which is to reduce these figures.↩
3. See
4. Respondent asserts, and there is substantial evidence, that petitioner has actually kept its books on an accrual method of accounting. However, for purposes of this opinion we will proceed on the basis that petitioner's books and records were maintained on a hybrid system.↩
5. All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect for the taxable years in issue.↩
6. Petitioner kept an accounts receivable ledger with a separate entry for each customer wherein appeared the hearings "Total Accounts Receivable Balance", "Current Amount Due", "30-60 Days", "60-90 Days", and "Over 90 Days". This was set up at the time of petitioner's incorporation by Price Waterhouse, a respected international accounting firm. The use by Price Waterhouse of accounts receivable records indicates that an accrual, not the cash method of accounting, may well be the generally accepted accounting method for petitioner's business.↩
7. Had petitioner been operating on a consignment basis it would have reported income when the retailer sold the goods, not when petitioner was paid. Furthermore, petitioner has not shown that it retained title to the goods while in the retailer's hands. Randall Lytle noted only that risk of loss issues were only discussed with retailers after a loss by fire or otherwise occurred. The parties would work out the burden of loss at that time. Also, if petitioner had been on the consignment basis with its customers it would have had to include all consigned goods in its ending inventory.
8. Under Sec. 458(a) (effective only for taxable years beginning after September 30, 1979) an accrual-basis distributor of records may elect to exclude from gross income the income attributable to merchandise returned within four and one half months after the close of the taxable year in which the sales were made. Although not effective for the taxable years in issue, the legislative history indicates that under pre-section 458 law petitioner is required to include the income from the sale of records in gross income when they are shipped to retailers, irrespective of the number of returns. H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 95-1800, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 279, 1978-3 (Vol. 1) C.B. 521 (1978).
Although we sympathize with the petitioner's plight -- that the effect of pre-section 458 law will result in a "bunching" of income in its taxable year 1972 -- we note that petitioner will enjoy an offsetting decrease in income for its taxable year 1980 due to section 458. For years after 1980 the effect of section 458 will be to more accurately reflect petitioner's income than at any time in the past.↩
9.
(a) General Rule.--
(1) Wholly worthless debts.--There shall be allowed as a deduction any debt which becomes worthless within the taxable year.
(2) Partially worthless debts.--When satisfied that a debt is recoverable only in part, the Secretary or his delegate may allow such debt, in an amount not in excess of the part charged off within the taxable year, as a deduction.↩
10.
11. It should be, noted that although petitioner charged the debt off its books in 1978 it did not take an income tax deduction for it in 1978.↩
12. Cf. section 481(a). We note that
13. See also
Wilkinson-Beane, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 420 F.2d 352 ( 1970 )
Bradstreet Co. of Maine v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 65 F.2d 943 ( 1933 )
estate-of-john-iverson-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-mardrid-reite , 255 F.2d 1 ( 1958 )
Caldwell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner ... , 202 F.2d 112 ( 1953 )
Richard R. Riss, Sr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 478 F.2d 1160 ( 1973 )
Duesenberg, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 84 F.2d 921 ( 1936 )
Los Angeles Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation v. United ... , 289 F.2d 222 ( 1961 )
Spring City Foundry Co. v. Commissioner , 54 S. Ct. 644 ( 1934 )
Niles Bement Pond Co. v. United States , 50 S. Ct. 251 ( 1930 )
Thor Power Tool Co. v. Commissioner , 99 S. Ct. 773 ( 1979 )