DocketNumber： Docket No. 23263-89
Judges： FAY,PATE
Filed Date： 5/9/1994
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 11/20/2020
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
FAY, 1983 Items Adjusted As Reported As Adjusted Partnership Loss $ 611,449 -0- Qualified Investment Credit Property 20,466,000 -0- 1984 Items Adjusted As Reported As Adjusted Partnership Loss $ 1,217,001 -0- Qualified Investment Credit Property 4,354,512 -0-
*206 In the FPAA's, respondent adjusted partnership losses and investment tax credits relating to 46 properties associated with the publication of 44 books and 2 computer programs which Series 115 leased from Universal Publishing Resources, Ltd. (hereinafter Universal). After ruling on certain evidentiary matters, we must decide whether petitioner was entitled to the deductions and credits reported on its 1983 and 1984 partnership returns. Specifically, the issues for our consideration include: (1) Whether Series 115's leasing activities had economic substance, and (2) if so, whether such leasing activities constituted activities engaged in for profit within the meaning of section 183, and (3) if so, whether the debt portion of Universal's purchase price for the properties leased to Series 115 should be recognized for investment tax credit purposes; and (4) if so, whether Series 115's basis in the properties must be allocated between tangible properties and intangible rights.
FINDINGS OF FACT
When the petition herein was filed, Series 115's principal place of business was in Rockville Centre, New York. Some of the facts have been stipulated, and they are so found. Additionally, *207 the parties have agreed that the Court may incorporate into evidence certain portions of the record developed in the proceeding entitled
An individual named Irving Cohen (hereinafter Cohen) organized and controlled Universal*208 and promoted the transactions involved herein. He received a bachelor's degree in English in 1961 and a master's degree in English Literature in 1962. In 1977, Cohen began investigating the publishing industry and, in 1978, formed a corporation, Jonathan T. Bromwell and Associates, Inc. (hereinafter Bromwell). All of the issued and outstanding stock of Bromwell was held in trust for the benefit of Cohen's children. In 1978, Bromwell purchased 301 literary properties, substantially all of which were published as mass market paperbacks. *209 Between 1981 and 1983, Barrister organized and was the general partner of a number of limited partnerships, all similar to one another. It organized 29 limited partnerships in 1981, an additional 35 limited partnerships in 1982 (named Barrister Equipment Associates Series 80 through 114, and 300), and another 60 limited partnerships in 1983 (named Barrister Equipment Associates Series 115 through 175, 201 and 302) (collectively referred to herein as the Barrister Partnerships). Barrister served as general partner of 58 of the 1983 partnerships; an entity named Barrister Associates, Inc., was the general partner of the other two.
The Barrister partnerships were organized to acquire and exploit literary and computer program properties, which were purchased or leased, directly or indirectly, from corporations owned or controlled by Cohen. Promotional materials for these partnerships stressed that investors who acquired limited partnership interests could recover substantial amounts of money solely by claiming the purported tax benefits associated with the purchase and lease of these properties.
Neither Belloff nor Gold had a background in the publishing industry before Cohen approached*210 them about forming Barrister. Consequently, Cohen, his employees and associates, and the entities he directed or controlled, *211
Universal acquired the properties it leased to Series 115 from several publishers. For this purpose, Cohen used form acquisition agreements which provided that Universal purchased certain "physical properties" to be used in printing the books. The properties consisted of: a number of engraved plates and/or lithographic films each embodying forms of either 32 or 16 pages of the text of the Literary Work and other pages to be included in the printed book; four color processed engraved lithographic films embodying the front cover art work for the printed book; and four color processed engraved lithographic films embodying the spine and back cover art work for the printed book, it being understood and agreed that no original artist's rendition is included in the above.
The above quoted paragraph describes the 44 properties purchased by Universal that were used to produce books. Universal also purchased two properties (disks) used to produce computer programs. Hereinafter, the term "properties" will refer to properties used to produce both books and computer programs.
The publishers solicited by Universal had agreements with various authors. *212 In a typical example, the author of Worstward Ho sold exclusive rights to print, publish, and sell his work to Grove Press, Inc. Grove Press agreed to pay the author an advance of $ 1,000 -- $ 500 on the date of agreement and another $ 500 on publication. Additionally, for sales in the United States, Grove Press agreed to pay the author royalties at the rate of 10 percent of the retail cover price on the first 5,000 copies sold, 12.5 percent of the cover price on the next 5,000 copies sold, and 15 percent of that price on all copies sold thereafter.
Universal's negotiations with publishers, in particular Richard Gallen (hereinafter Gallen), *213 negotiation. Gallen wanted the acquisition agreements to provide for a large amount of debt so that he would be able to keep substantially all of the publisher's revenues *214 to Series 115 consisting of 44 books and 2 computer programs for a total price of $ 25,644,000 (See Appendix D). The books included hardbacks for children, teenagers, and adults, and mass market and trade paperbacks produced from original manuscripts and reprints. They included game, puzzle, comic, cartoon, art, text, reference, biography, poetry, mystery, adventure, thriller, western, science fiction, historical account, and historical fiction books. Titles of these computer programs and books are listed in Appendix A.
Universal paid the total purchase price by making a cash downpayment of $ 710,100 and executing "recourse" notes totaling $ 24,933,900 which bore simple interest at a rate of 9 percent per annum. For the first 12 years, Universal was required to make payments on the notes only from the revenues. Specifically, the notes, including interest, were payable from approximately 75 to 83 percent of the revenues generated by sales of the initial printing and at lesser rates (60 percent for Pinnacle and 80 percent for Price/Stern) for copies sold in excess of the initial printing. After 12 years, the entire unpaid balance on Universal's notes came due.
If Universal failed*215 to make any of the payments, the publishers could declare the deferred obligations due and payable in full, and the properties would revert to them with no further liability on Universal's part. Moreover, on default, the publishers could take Universal's place with respect to any leases Universal had made with others regarding the properties.
Once Universal had purchased the properties, it leased them to Series 115. In one typical example, Universal leased the properties associated with the book Exocet to Series 115 for a period of 8 years. *216 of such revenues from sales of the books.
Series 115 entered into similar leases with respect to the other properties it leased from Universal. For all of the properties leased by Series 115, the fixed rents totaled $ 610,000 for the first lease year, $ 1,092,500 for the second lease year, and $ 1,417,000 for each lease year thereafter. See Appendix B. The variable rents for the initial printing were computed based on a percentage of the revenues. These percentages varied from lease to lease. For the initial printing, it varied between 75 and 83 percent, with the average variable rents amounting to 80.3 percent. See Appendix B. For the minimum additional printings, the variable rents ranged from 57.5 to 81 percent, with an average of 69.6 percent. See Appendix B.
In the first 2 years, the total rents Series*217 115 agreed to pay Universal equalled the sum of the fixed and variable rents. However, if during the second year, the variable rents were less than the stated minimum variable rents, Series 115 was obligated to pay the fixed rents plus the minimum variable rents. The minimum variable rents for all the lease contracts totaled $ 322,500.
For the remaining years, Series 115 was obligated to pay the greater of the fixed rents or the variable rents. If the variable rents exceeded the fixed rents, the excess served as a credit against the fixed rents for subsequent years. The Offering Memorandum contained a "Summary of Lease Payments" in which Barrister represented that the total amount of the rents to be paid during the term of the lease would be $ 10,527,000. *218 investment tax credit, the lessor (Universal) would treat the lessee (Series 115) as having purchased the properties for the amount of Universal's purchase price, including the amount of the debt. Exploitation of the Properties
Cohen also arranged, on behalf of Series 115, to have *219 "services contractors" publish, distribute, and sell the products to be produced with the properties Universal leased to Series 115. In most cases, the services contractors were the actual publishers of the books or the computer programs, or affiliates of those publishers. In fact, a subsidiary of Richard Gallen & Co., Inc., Confucian Press, Inc. (hereinafter Confucian), served as a services contractor for 16 of the properties that Universal leased to Series 115.
Typical of the services agreements was one which Confucian entered into on May 25, 1983, wherein Confucian agreed to produce, print, bind, distribute, sell, and promote for a 9-year period the books produced from 12 of the properties. The services agreement set forth the number of copies which were included in the "initial printing". Gallen supplied these numbers based on his experience with similar books and, if the solicitation process was underway, the canvassing of prospective customers. The number of copies set forth in the initial printing were required to be printed and available for distribution by December 31, 1984.
Series 115 could request that the services contractors print copies up to the amount listed *220 at the initial printing. However, the services contractors were not required to print the agreed "minimum additional printings" without Series 115 making an upfront payment unless there was no commercial quantity of the initial printing available for sale.
One services contractor required an addendum to its services agreement providing that it had no obligation even to print the number of books called for as the initial printing. It only had to print the number of copies that it determined were needed to meet its marketing requirements. At the time this services contractor entered into its services agreement, the initial printing for the majority of its books ranged between 10,000 and 50,000 copies.
Neither Gallen nor Confucian played any part in determining the number of copies included as minimum additional printings. *221 amount of time it would take to sell the books.
In total, the services agreements set forth initial printings totaling 2,102,500 copies and minimum additional printings of 17,360,000 copies. See Appendix C.
As consideration for the services to be rendered under the services agreements, Series 115 agreed to pay the services contractors a fee representing approximately 15 to 20 percent of the revenues from each book.
Although the services agreement provided that Confucian would print and distribute the books, Confucian actually contracted with national distributors to provide all the printing and distribution services called for under the services agreements. The national distributors paid Confucian a portion of the retail price, called the "net sales" price. After deducting its fee, Confucian remitted most of the balance it owed Series 115 either*222 directly to the publishers as payments on Universal's notes or to Universal to be applied against Series 115's lease payments.
For example, the national distributor paid Confucian $ 1 per copy sold of Brimstone. From that revenue, Confucian kept 15 cents as its fee, and paid 83 cents to the publisher as a payment on Universal's notes, or paid that amount directly to Universal for the lease payments owed to it by Series 115. Confucian remitted the remaining 2 cents to Series 115.
With regard to sales generated by the initial printing, the net effect of these leases and services agreements was that the publishers (together with their services contractors) would retain approximately 98 percent of the revenues as payment of their fees for the printing and distribution of the books and payments on Universal's notes to them. As one publisher characterized the deal -- The formula was a payment obligation under the service and acquisition agreement. * * * the publisher was entitled * * * to retain as an amortization payment approximately 79 percent of the monies billed, and also received a service fee of approximately 19 to 20 percent.
*223 The limited partnership interests in Series 115 were sold by Chadwick Investor Services, Inc. (hereinafter Chadwick), a corporation owned in equal shares by Belloff, Gold, and Ronald Cohen (no family relationship to Irving Cohen). *224 2 computer programs, their authors, and the proposed national distributors. On the first page, the Summary Brochure highlighted the features of Series 115 as follows:
. Significant Cash Distributions and Profits
. 4:1 equivalent leverage in 1983; 2:1 in 1984 - (deductions plus investment tax credits - * * *)
. No Recapture - this is not a deferral program
. No Personal Liability beyond Investment
The Summary Brochure further explained that an investment of $ 50,000 over 2 years would produce "Total Equivalent Deductions" of $ 101,200 for 1983 and $ 50,000 for 1984.
The Offering Memorandum disclosed that the $ 2,000,000 to be invested in Series 115 by the limited partners would be paid out as follows: $ 1,702,500 in fixed lease payments for the first and second lease years; $ 200,000 in selling commissions; and $ 102,500 in fees and selling expenses. Of the latter amount, some $ 62,500 went to Barrister as "General Partner's Fee and Expenses". Additionally, Series 115 was to pay 3 percent of its cash flow to Barrister until the limited partners were credited with net income equal to their capital investment. Thereafter, Barrister was entitled to 20 percent of the cash flow.
*225 The 40 limited partnership units in Series 115 were sold at $ 50,000 cash per unit for a total of $ 2,000,000. Barrister contributed an additional $ 25,000 to Series 115's capital, for a total of $ 2,025,000.
With regard to the potential profitability of Series 115, the Summary Brochure warned potential limited partners that: Although a Cash Flow Analysis appears in the offering memorandum as Exhibit 1, no representations or warranties of any kind are intended or should be inferred as to any economic return due to the unpredictable nature of future sales, prices, and operating expenses. if future sales of the partnership were to approximate only the minimum number of copies contracted to be produced during the next eight (8) years, each partner would likely receive cash distributions in excess of approximately $ 150,000 per unit * * * .
However, the Offering Memorandum was much more detailed. It also explained that: Although the appraisals support the value of the Properties on both the Lessor and Partnership levels, there is no guarantee that all or any of the Books or Disks will*226 achieve the level of sales necessary to result in Partnership profits. The Services Contractors have agreed to use their best efforts but are not bound by any minimum performance requirement.
The Offering Memorandum contained the "Cash Flow Analysis" referred to in the Summary Brochure. This analysis projected the amount of cash that would be received by Series 115 under three scenarios: (1) If the initial printing was sold, (2) if both the initial printing and the minimum additional printings were sold, and (3) if the initial printing and 50 percent of the minimum additional printings were sold.
Assuming that only the initial printing was sold, these projections showed $ 153,638 in cash going to Series 115. However, these projections failed to take into account the fixed rents due during the first and second lease years ($ 610,000 and $ 1,092,500 respectively), which were payable in addition to the variable rents. If those fixed rents had been deducted, under this scenario, Series 115 would have shown a negative cash flow of $ 1,548,862.
Secondly, the cash flow analysis assumed that the entire initial printing and the entire minimum additional printings were sold. Using*227 these assumptions, petitioner projected that $ 6,586,428 in cash would flow to Series 115. However, the calculation again ignored the fixed rents that had to be paid in the first two lease years. When these fixed rents are deducted, the cash flow is reduced to $ 4,883,928. Under this scenario, the limited partners would reap a profit in excess of $ 2 million.
Finally, petitioner projected Series 115's cash flow assuming that the initial printing and half of the minimum additional printings were sold. In these projections, petitioner represented that Series 115 would receive $ 2,979,696 in cash flow. *228
Series 115 did not pay its fixed rental obligations for the third lease year. In fact, Gold testified that Cohen "terminated" Series 115's obligations to pay fixed rents starting with the third lease year.
On its partnership returns of income for 1983 and 1984, Series 115 reported the following income and expenses:
| 1983 | 1984 | |
| Gross receipts | $ 753,904 | $ 1,460,676 |
| Cost of goods sold | (345,296) | (1,244,372) |
| Nonqualifying interest | ||
| and nonqualifying | ||
| dividend | 298 | |
| Other deductions: | ||
| Lease rental expense | (1,010,242) | (1,415,643) |
| Amortization of | ||
| organization expense | (9,800) | (14,500) |
| Professional fees | (1,888) | |
| Management fees | (1,332) | |
| Miscellaneous | (15) | (240) |
| Ordinary loss | $ (611,449) | $ (1,217,001) |
In addition, Series 115 reported that it had purchased property eligible for the investment tax credit at a cost of $ 20,466,000 in 1983 and 4,354,512 in 1984.
In 1985 through 1988, Series 115 reported the following total income, deductions, and losses:
| Total | Total | ||
| Year | Income | Deductions | Loss |
| 1985 | $ 259,476 | $ 288,160 | $ (28,684) |
| 1986 | 188,416 | 198,410 | (9,994) |
| 1987 | 120,146 | 135,308 | (15,162) |
| 1988 | 63,069 | 68,745 | (5,676) |
*229
In 1983, Cohen obtained letters from two individuals valuing each of the properties Universal purchased and leased to Series 115. Although these letters were received in evidence, they were not offered by petitioner for the truth of the matters asserted therein. Therefore, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, petitioner may not use them to prove the value of the properties, the amount of the revenues they were likely to produce, or to evaluate whether the limited partners were likely to realize a profit on their investment. See
On the other hand, with regard to the fair market value of the properties leased by Series 115, respondent submitted appraisals by experts Charles Selden (hereinafter Selden), Thomas Congdon (hereinafter Congdon), and Gloria Mosesson (hereinafter Mosesson). Because petitioner did not submit any expert evidence to contradict respondent's experts' appraisals and because we find such appraisals are, in the main, reasonable, we only briefly summarize them here.
Selden reviewed the 2 computer programs, taking into account factors affecting the "electronic publishing industry", the specifics of each program, the market*230 segment at which the programs were directed, the commitments given by the publisher, and foreseeable upgrades and revisions needed for new computers. He factored in various "limitations", which he grouped under topics such as "attraction", "technique", "competition", and "useful life". He concluded that the value of the software, based upon anticipated sales, less his anticipated costs to manufacture and sell was zero. He also valued one book, Profitability and Cash Management, that dealt with computer applications at zero, noting flagrant editorial errors in the published text.
Mosesson appraised 38 books. She described the physical appearance of each book, its contents, the number of copies she estimated would be sold and the net income likely to be generated. In general, she valued each book on the basis of the net income she projected it would produce. Congdon prepared a similar analysis with regard to the remaining six books. Based on the findings reached by all three expert appraisers, we find that the publishers would sell 1,410,850 books and pieces of software produced from the properties leased by Series 115 from Universal. See Appendix C.
Respondent also presented*231 a report prepared by and the testimony of Dr. James W. Hoag (hereinafter Hoag), an expert in finance and economics. Hoag prepared a series of calculations designed to determine the amount of cash that would have been available for distribution to Series 115's limited partners under a variety of assumptions.
The first series used, as starting points, information contained in the Offering Memorandum. The first calculation assumed that the entire initial printing (2.1 million copies) would be sold. Under this scenario, Hoag estimated that the rents Series 115 would pay to Universal would equal $ 7,294,032 and that Series 115's limited partners would lose 97 percent of their investment. The second calculation assumed that the entire minimum printing (4 million copies) would be sold. Under this scenario, the limited partners would receive cash distributions of $ 4 million more than their investment. Further, Hoag calculated that for the limited partners to receive cash distributions equal to their original investment (break-even), approximately 346 percent of the initial printing would have to be sold.
Hoag then turned his attention to determining the level of sales that could *232 reasonably have been predicted at the time of the formation of Series 115. He pinpointed three factors which could have been considered in making this determination. Those factors consisted of: (1) Estimates by appraisers, (2) projections based on past performances of the publishers involved, and (3) industrywide statistics. Of these factors, Hoag felt that projections made from past performances of the actual publishers involved would constitute the most specific, and therefore the most accurate, factor for purposes of projecting sales and resulting cash flows.
Hoag first calculated expected cash flows based on the volume of sales projected by respondent's appraisers *233 of 1,447,350 copies for total projected revenues of $ 3,324,908. *234 a partnership where, overall, only 10 percent of the initial printing had been sold. The best performing partnership showed that 40 percent of its initial printing had been sold. The average of the entire group showed sales of 21.1 percent of the initial printing. Applying this percentage to project Series 115's sales (he assumed that 21.1 percent of the copies listed as the initial printing would be sold) again indicated that all of the limited partners would lose their entire investment.
OPINION
Before we can address whether Series 115 is entitled to the losses and credits at issue, we must rule on the parties' evidentiary objections. Petitioner objects, on the grounds of relevancy, to those parts of respondent's proposed First Supplemental Stipulation of Facts and attached exhibits concerning Cohen's prior book publishing activities. In other words, petitioner asks us to exclude all evidence relating to the organization and operation of prior Barrister partnerships and other entities promoted by Cohen.
evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that*235 is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
In this case, we decide whether Series 115 was entitled to deduct losses and claim investment tax credits in connection with certain leasing transactions. As part of that inquiry, we must determine whether the transactions in question possessed economic substance and were entered into with a profit objective. Series 115 was promoted by Cohen, and it engaged in book publishing activities. When Cohen organized Series 115 in 1983, he already had been engaged in book publishing activities for a period exceeding 4 years. His prior success (or lack thereof) in transactions similar to the ones in issue would aid us in*236 deciding whether or not the transactions in issue here contained economic substance and were entered into with a profit objective. *237 by the prospective limited partners in their evaluation of Series 115's chances of success. Consequently, we find that the evidence of past activities of Cohen and his controlled and affiliated entities is relevant within the meaning of
Petitioner also objects to the admission of the testimony and reports of respondent's expert witnesses. Expert evidence is admissible if it will "assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue."
Nevertheless, petitioner argues that respondent's expert evidence, which addresses the fair market value of the properties purchased by Universal and leased by Series 115, is unnecessary to our decision inasmuch as we must recognize Universal's purchase prices as the fair market value of the properties because the properties were purchased as a result of arm's-length*238 negotiations. However, as discussed
Having disposed of petitioner's evidentiary objections, we now turn our attention to respondent's. Respondent seeks to exclude the evidence contained in the Second Stipulation of Facts, specifically Exhibit 50-AX. That exhibit consists of three letters obtained by Universal during the formation of Series 115 which contain opinions of the fair market values of the properties leased by Series 115. Respondent objects to the admission of these letters on the grounds of hearsay and relevancy. The relevancy objection was subsequently withdrawn by respondent in her opening brief.
Hearsay is defined in *239 a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
On brief, however, petitioner states that it seeks to introduce the letters, not for the truth of the matters asserted therein, but only "to corroborate the testimony of Belloff and Gold and Cohen that they consulted such experts before the properties were acquired and leased and acted in good faith on the basis of such consultations and opinion letters". With this stipulation, petitioner is not offering the letters for the truth of their contents. Accordingly, they are not hearsay. Moreover, respondent has stipulated that petitioner received such letters. Accordingly, we hold that the letters are admissible for the purpose for which they were offered.
Turning our attention now to the substantive issues before us, petitioner first contends that the losses and investment tax credits claimed by Series 115 are allowable because the transactions in issue possessed economic substance. Because the losses were sustained principally as a result of the large amount of rents that Series 115 was obligated*240 to pay Universal, and because the investment tax credit was based upon Universal's purchase price for the properties, we specifically must decide whether Universal's purchase of the properties and subsequent leases to Series 115 were sufficiently based upon business rather than tax avoidance considerations.
In general, a transaction is effective for income tax purposes only if its economic substance is consonant with its intended tax effects.
In evaluating whether a transaction possesses economic substance, we look to objective factors which indicate whether the taxpayer acquired an equity interest in the property and whether the taxpayer had a realistic potential for profit.
Petitioner contends that the record in this case contains sufficient evidence for us to find that Cohen engaged in arm's-length negotiations on Universal's behalf to purchase the properties it leased to Series 115 and, therefore, Universal's purchase price reflects the fair market value of the properties purchased. Petitioner further contends that arm's-length negotiating between Universal and Series 115 established the fair rental value of the properties leased. In considering petitioner's arguments, we first must specify exactly what negotiations we are evaluating.
We quickly dispose of petitioner's contention that the negotiations between Cohen, on behalf of Universal, and Belloff and Gold, the general partners of Barrister, on behalf of Series 115, relating to the lease of the properties were at arm's length. It is evident that Cohen effectively controlled, not only Universal, but also Barrister and Series 115. He promoted all three of these entities. He provided the ideas, the expertise, the capital, the legal opinions, and the personnel for these entities. He produced all relevant agreements and engaged the *245 staff necessary to supervise operation of those agreements. He recruited Belloff and Gold as general partners of Barrister (which in turn organized Series 115) to help him carry out his overall program.
Nevertheless, petitioner contends that Barrister was an independent partnership and that it was headed up by Belloff and Gold, who were independent individuals who used their independent judgment in making decisions for Series 115. However, petitioner has failed to demonstrate any meaningful degree of independence between Cohen and Series 115, or Barrister, or Belloff, or Gold. Consequently, we are unable to conclude that, if any negotiations took place between Cohen and these individuals or entities as to the purchase prices of the properties, they were conducted at arm's length. Accordingly, such negotiations do not establish that the properties were leased at their fair market value.
On the other hand, Cohen's negotiations on behalf of Universal with Gallen and the other publishers were between unrelated parties. However, to determine that an arm's-length transaction took place, we must find that the buyer was motivated to secure the lowest purchase price possible and, conversely, *246 that the seller looked to obtain the highest price. See
With regard to the purchase of the properties by Universal, it is evident that Cohen (as a representative of Universal) had little interest in securing the lowest purchase price. In May of 1983, when Cohen was negotiating for the purchase of the properties from Gallen, he already had years of experience with book publishing programs. He knew, for instance, that the 1981 partnerships realized sales equal to only 21 percent of *247 their initial printing and that such results would not come close to generating the revenues needed to pay the total purchase price.
*249 On the other hand, when we focus on the cash aspect of the transaction, it was in Cohen's interest to minimize the amount that would be paid to the publishers. In this, he succeeded quite well. Universal initially paid the publishers only $ 710,100 in cash for all 46 properties, less than 3 percent of the total purchase price of $ 25,644,000 (See Appendix D). When Cohen arranged the leases between Universal and Series 115, he structured the deal so that Series 115 was obligated to pay fixed rents to Universal during the first 2 lease years totaling $ 1,702,500 in cash. See Appendix B. Since Cohen controlled Universal, all cash it received in excess of that paid to the publishers ($ 710,100) ultimately inured to the benefit of the trusts for Cohen's children. *250 For their part, the publishers accepted as much cash from Universal as they could get. Any such cash would be a windfall for them, because they risked little in giving up title to the properties. Cohen's arrangements permitted the publishers (or occasionally, a combination of publishers and services contractors) to keep all but 1 to 5 percent of the amounts they would have received without the infusion of the $ 710,100 cash.
With regard to the total amount of debt, the publishers were content with assurances that the notes would be high enough to enable them to retain any foreseeable profits from the properties. For instance, Gallen testified that he wanted notes high enough to assure him that he would receive the revenues produced by 7 to 10 times the initial printing. That Gallen received such notes indicates that Cohen was not interested in obtaining the lowest price; an arm's-length buyer would not have bought a property where the seller was going to retain almost all of the profits to be realized from the property. Moreover, having received assurances of the cash and potential profit he sought, Gallen had no reason to object to artificially inflating the selling price. *251
Petitioner argues that Cohen negotiated for as many properties as he could get for the total purchase price and that the fact that Cohen tried to get more properties than the publishers initially agreed to sell Universal is evidence of arm's-length negotiations between Cohen and the publishers. This argument is disingenuous because the number of properties purchased is meaningless. What is important was the total purchase price which had to be more than $ 20 million (10 percent of which equaled the $ 2 million cash investment of the Series 115 limited partners) in order to support the investment tax credits promised in the Offering Memorandum and attract potential limited partners. In addition, it was important to Cohen to minimize the total cash downpayment made to the publishers because that maximized the amount of cash remaining in Universal's coffers. For example, in looking at Appendix D, we find that the purchase price of book 1 was $ 2.8 million, composed of a $ 75,000 downpayment and a note of $ 2,725,000. In comparison, the purchase of books 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14A, 14B, 15, *252 16, and 22 for $ 2,846,000 was composed of $ 106,525 in cash and $ 2,739,475 in notes. Yet, the appraised value of book 1 was $ 307,412, whereas the aggregate appraised value of the 13 other books was only $ 133,023. We conclude therefrom that, in buying book 1, Cohen made a much better deal than he did in buying the other 13, even though the purchase price of the one was almost the same as the total purchase price for the other 13. Therefore, to argue that the negotiations were at arm's length because Cohen was trying to purchase more properties is nonsensical.
Petitioner also argues that a motive to save taxes does not taint the arm's-length nature of the acquisition of the properties. It maintains that the "tax laws affect the shape of every business transaction and
For the reasons stated above, we conclude that the negotiations between the publishers and Cohen (on behalf of Universal and Series 115) were not conducted at arm's length. It follows then that the acquisition agreements do not necessarily reflect the fair market value of the properties purchased therein.
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has described an inflated purchase price as "Perhaps the most important single factor suggesting that the actual motive for the * * * activities was tax avoidance rather than even speculative profit".
The rents to be paid by Series 115 were equally untenable. Respondent's experts predicted that, in the first 3 years, Series 115 was to pay rents of $ 5,000,182 on properties which had to be worth less than the revenues they would produce -- $ 3,324,908. In the next 5 years of the lease, Series 115 was obligated to pay total fixed rents of $ 7,085,000, less any carry forwards from the third year. This meant that Series 115 had agreed to pay rents of approximately $ 12,085,182. These calculations reveal that, not only were the rents vastly overstated, but, even assuming that the rents were fair, the total purchase price of over $ 25 million was grossly unjustified.
Nevertheless, petitioner argues that respondent's experts were too subjective because their values reflected their personal tastes rather than objective considerations. Petitioner's contention misses the point. It was petitioner's burden to establish a proximity between the $ 25 million purchase price of the properties and their actual*256 fair market value. Petitioner, however, has made no serious attempt to meet its burden of showing that the properties' prices reflected their fair market values or that the rents Series 115 agreed to make were reasonable.
In the absence of any expert opinions to the contrary, we had only respondent's experts' opinions to rely on. As to petitioner's criticism of respondent's experts, like the Second Circuit in
Moreover, even if we ignored respondent's experts' opinions, petitioner's own Offering Memorandum represented that rents due Universal from Series 115 would total $ 10,527,000. These rents were Universal's sole source of funds to pay off the nearly $ 25 million in notes executed to purchase the properties. Under such a scenario, Universal would never come close to paying*257 off notes.
Thus, we find here, as we did in The record is devoid of evidence showing that the purchase price * * * was in any way determined with a "true regard for the profitability of the activity."
For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the purchase price of the properties was vastly overstated.
In this case, by far the greatest portion of the purchase price of the properties was financed by debt ($ 24,933,900 of a total purchase price of $ 25,644,900). Moreover, although denominated "recourse", these notes were payable only out of the proceeds from the sale of the books and computer programs produced by the properties until 12 years*258 after their purchase. In evaluating this and similar arrangements in By labeling the notes recourse, Cohen insured that these debts would be included in computing the investment tax credit. In reality, however, the promissory notes were functionally identical to nonrecourse obligations. The Properties purchased with the notes were pledged as security but, until twelve years after their execution, no payments were due on the notes except to the extent the Properties purchased realized net revenues. At the end of twelve years, the publishers could look only to the corporate assets of Townsend [the subsidiary of Madison] and Universal to collect amounts still owed on the notes. A trier could thus easily find that by then the corporate cupboards would be bare.
We agree with that assessment in this case. That the notes were labeled "recourse" is not itself controlling; substance, not form, must govern.
On numerous occasions, courts*259 have found that a disproportionately large amount of nonrecourse debt included in the purchase price of a piece of property indicates that a transaction lacks economic substance. See, e.g.,
Moreover, petitioner has not demonstrated that Universal could have paid off the notes created to finance the purchase *260 price of the properties. Those notes totaled almost $ 25 million and carried interest at 9 percent per annum. Under the most optimistic circumstances, it is conceivable that the entire initial printing would have been sold. Even assuming that rosy scenario, Universal could not have paid off the notes, for, to do so, Universal could only look to the rents it was to receive from Series 115. The only source of funds for Series 115 to pay rents was the initial infusion of capital by its limited partners of $ 2 million and the revenues from the sale of the initial printing after deducting payments to the services contractors (as projected by petitioner in its Offering Memorandum) of $ 5,635,818. Even assuming that all of the funds received by Series 115 would be paid to Universal, that sum would not even come close to covering the principal balance due on the notes, much less pay any interest accrued thereon. Because, even under these most favorable assumptions, Universal's notes were not even remotely likely to be paid, they do not constitute genuine indebtedness, and we will not give them effect for tax purposes. See
However, petitioner argues further that Belloff and Gold, as general partners of Barrister (which was the general partner of Series 115), would be liable for payment to Universal for any rents not paid by Series 115 and that these funds could be used to repay Universal's notes. However, there is no evidence in the record that Belloff and Gold could pay the $ 1.4 million in fixed rents due each year. Moreover, with interest accruing on the nearly $ 25 million in notes at the rate of 9 percent per annum, we do not see how the fixed rents would even cover the accrued interest much less pay down the principal. Further, petitioner failed to prove the unlikely proposition that Belloff and Gold possessed the financial wherewithal to pay the underlying debt of approximately $ 25 million, as well as the substantial debts incurred by each of the other 123 Barrister partnerships. *262
The agreements between the publishers, services contractors, Universal, and Series 115 were framed so that the publishers, together with the services contractors, never relinquished the burdens and benefits of owning the properties. With regard to the burdens, the publishers acquired and edited the manuscripts, designed the covers, and then, through either Confucian or their own subsidiaries, promoted, printed, and distributed the books and computer programs. In short, the publishers performed or controlled all of the functions they would have performed had they never sold their properties to Universal.
The publishers also retained the benefits of such ownership. Their arrangements with Universal and Series 115 provided that the publishers either alone, or in combination with their services contractors, would get a substantial cash downpayment plus all but 1 to 5 percent of the revenues from the initial printing. Moreover, in the unlikely event that the properties were used for additional copies, the publishers were entitled to the bulk of those revenues.
On the other hand, neither Universal nor Series 115 had anything*263 to do with controlling, publishing, or promoting the properties. Universal merely paid for bare ownership rights; its primary interest was in establishing a basis for charging Series 115 rents for the properties and for passing through to the limited partners the inflated tax benefits allegedly generated by its ownership of the properties.
Another factor indicating that the transaction at issue lacked economic substance was the parties' lack of adherence to the contractual terms in later years. The most serious deviation from the contractual terms was Series 115's failure to pay, and Universal's failure to try to enforce collection of, the fixed rental obligations starting with the third lease year. However, petitioner objects to our using facts that occurred after the organization of Series 115 and the sale of the partnership interests arguing that it constitutes impermissible hindsight in evaluating Series 115's prospects as of 1983. We do not recite these facts for purposes of deciding this case by way of hindsight. Instead, we have set them forth to show that subsequent events are consistent with our evaluation that the Series 115's *264 transactions lacked economic substance during the years at issue. See
The cash flow projections contained in the Offering Memorandum showed that Series 115 would distribute sufficient cash to the limited partners for them to realize a profit if sales equaled the anticipated minimum printings totaling 19,462,500 copies. As previously discussed, these sales figures were many times larger than the numbers of books or computer programs likely to be printed or sold. In fact, this volume of books was so unrealistically large that even the services contractors insisted upon amending the contract language to make it clear that they were obligated to publish no more than the initial printing, except under*265 conditions which, in effect, transferred the risk to Series 115. Even on brief, petitioner does not present any serious argument that the publishers planned to print anywhere close to the number of copies included in the anticipated minimum printing. Therefore, we conclude that the income projections based on sales of the number of copies listed as the anticipated minimum printings were not even close to being attainable.
The total initial printing consisted of 2,102,500 copies, a mere one-ninth of the 19,462,500 anticipated minimum printing. The Offering Memorandum contained a cash-flow projection which indicated that sales of the initial printing would return modest amounts of cash to the partners. However, as noted previously, that projection fails to take into account payment of the required fixed rents. Had fixed rents been subtracted, each of the limited partners would have sustained a substantial loss.
As can readily be seen from our analysis of the economic aspects of this case, the positions taken by petitioner have been either unproved or discredited. No arm's-length negotiations structured the transactions. Petitioner failed to establish the reasonableness*266 of the purchase price of the properties purchased by Universal or the reasonableness of the rents Universal charged Series 115. The notes Universal gave the publishers as part of the purchase price far exceeded the value of the properties purchased and, for all practical purposes, there was no chance that they would ever be paid. The cash flow projections contained in the Offering Memorandum contained serious flaws. Finally, after Series 115 had operated for 2 years, Universal allowed it to ignore the payment of the fixed rents for no apparent business reason. All of these factors show that these transactions were formulated to generate bookkeeping entries in an attempt to create illegitimate tax losses and artificial investment tax credits for use by the limited partners. Petitioner not only failed to produce sufficient evidence to support a finding that the transactions at issue possessed economic substance, but respondent has adduced ample proof that the transactions, in fact, lacked economic substance. Accordingly, we hold that Series 115 is not entitled to the losses and investment tax credits it claimed.
On brief, the parties have also presented a number of other arguments addressing whether Series 115 is entitled to its claimed losses and investment tax credits. Those arguments are primarily directed toward whether Series 115 was engaged in its book publishing activities with an actual and honest objective of making a profit. See sec. 183. However, having held that the transactions in issue lacked economic substance and, therefore, that the claimed losses and investment tax credits are not allowable, it is unnecessary for us to address profit objective issues because "it is well established that a subjective profit motive can not save a transaction that objectively lacks economic substance".
Accordingly,
Computer Programs:
1. ABsCenes
2. Wings Out of Shadow
Books:
1. Exocet
2. Worstward Ho
3. The IBM/PC Guide to Profitability and Cash Management
4. Steele's War: The Preacher
5. Brimstone
6. Zork Number One: The Fortress of Krill
7. Chicago Deathwind (The Hitman No. One)
8. Cross the Stars
9. All the Love Poems of Shakespeare
10. Man, God and Civilization
11. Life and Times of Frederick Douglas
12. Autobiography of a Flea
13. Jean Rhys: Literature and Life Series
14A. The Silver Horse
14B. The Copper Crown
15. Langston Hughes: Before and Beyond Harlem
16. The Comic Art of Roy Wilson
17. Her Father's Daughter
18. Three Cities
19. The Oklahomans
20. The Silicon Valley Connection: Death Merchant No. 58
21. The Superman Story
22. The Cutthroat: The Warlord No. Two
23. The Cross and the Sickle
24. The One Eyed Doctor: Sigismund Freud [sic]
25. Fire in Beirut: Israel's War in Lebanon with the PLO
26. The First Omni Book of Science Fiction
27. The Second *269 Omni Book of Science Fiction
28. A History of Blitzkrieg
29. Autumntide
30. Sage
31. Dogs and Puppies Coloring Album
32. Troubador Treasury
33. Oriental Carpets
34. Chardin
35. Puzzlers and Other Games
36. Optricks
37. Great Ballet Paper Dolls
38. Johnny Got His Gun
39. Activities in Gross Motor, Fine Motor, Visual Perception
40. Activities in Reasoning, Receptive Language, Expressive Language
41. Activities in Social Emotional Development
42. Bodies and Souls
43. Pope John Paul II: The People's Pope
44. The Telsa Bequest
| Fixed Rent | |||
| Per Annum | |||
| Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3-8 | |
| Computer Programs: | |||
| 1. | $ 7,100 | $21,000 | $24,000 |
| 2. | 6,300 | 18,000 | 22,000 |
| Books: | |||
| 1. | $ 44,900 | $127,000 | $152,000 |
| 2. | 5,000 | 15,000 | 17,000 |
| 3. | 25,200 | 73,000 | 87,000 |
| 4. | 3,100 | 9,000 | 11,000 |
| 5. | 3,700 | 11,000 | 13,000 |
| 6. | 4,200 | 12,000 | 14,000 |
| 7. | 4,000 | 11,000 | 14,000 |
| 8. | 5,800 | 17,000 | 20,000 |
| 9. | 3,100 | 9,000 | 11,000 |
| 10. | 3,700 | 11,000 | 13,000 |
| 11. | 4,200 | 12,000 | 14,000 |
| 12. | 2,900 | 8,000 | 10,000 |
| 13. | 3,300 | 10,000 | 12,000 |
| 14. | 3,300 | 10,000 | 12,000 |
| 15. | 4,000 | 11,000 | 14,000 |
| 16. | 3,700 | 11,000 | 13,000 |
| 17. | 26,000 | 75,000 | 90,000 |
| 18. | 4,600 | 13,000 | 16,000 |
| 19. | 13,200 | 38,000 | 46,000 |
| 20. | 4,200 | 12,000 | 14,000 |
| 21. | 4,200 | 12,000 | 14,000 |
| 22. | 3,300 | 10,000 | 12,000 |
| 23. | 4,400 | 13,000 | 15,000 |
| 24. | 12,600 | 36,000 | 44,000 |
| 25. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 27,000 |
| 26. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 35,000 |
| 27. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 35,000 |
| 28. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 25,000 |
| 29. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 41,000 |
| 30. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 25,000 |
| 31. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 46,000 |
| 32. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 43,000 |
| 33. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 33,000 |
| 34. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 35,000 |
| 35. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 32,000 |
| 36. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 42,000 |
| 37. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 53,000 |
| 38. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 25,000 |
| 39. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 36,000 |
| 40. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 38,000 |
| 41. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 33,000 |
| 42. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 25,000 |
| 43. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 27,000 |
| 44. | 20,000 | 24,375 | 37,000 |
| TOTAL: | $ 610,000 | $ 1,092,500 | $ 1,417,000 |
| Variable Rent | |||
| Minimum | |||
| Initl. | Addl. | Year 2 | |
| Computer Programs: | |||
| 1. | 76.8% | 76.8% | $ 7,100 |
| 2. | 76.8% | 76.8% | 6,300 |
| Books: | |||
| 1. | 78.5% | 71.0% | $ 44,900 |
| 2. | 78.0% | 68.0% | 5,000 |
| 3. | 83.0% | 62.5% | 25,200 |
| 4. | 83.0% | 62.5% | 3,100 |
| 5. | 83.0% | 62.5% | 3,700 |
| 6. | 83.0% | 62.5% | 4,200 |
| 7. | 83.0% | 62.5% | 4,000 |
| 8. | 83.0% | 62.5% | 5,800 |
| 9. | 78.0% | 75.5% | 3,100 |
| 10. | 78.0% | 75.5% | 3,700 |
| 11. | 78.0% | 75.5% | 4,200 |
| 12. | 83.0% | 73.5% | 2,900 |
| 13. | 78.0% | 68.0% | 3,300 |
| 14. | 78.0% | 68.0% | 3,300 |
| 15. | 78.0% | 68.0% | 4,000 |
| 16. | 78.0% | 71.0% | 3,700 |
| 17. | 83.0% | 75.5% | 26,000 |
| 18. | 78.0% | 75.5% | 4,600 |
| 19. | 83.0% | 62.5% | 13,200 |
| 20. | 83.0% | 62.5% | 4,200 |
| 21. | 83.0% | 62.5% | 4,200 |
| 22. | 82.0% | 63.5% | 3,300 |
| 23. | 82.0% | 63.5% | 4,400 |
| 24. | 78.0% | 75.5% | 12,600 |
| 25. | 78.5% | 71.0% | 5,625 |
| 26. | 82.0% | 63.5% | 5,625 |
| 27. | 82.0% | 63.5% | 5,625 |
| 28. | 78.5% | 71.0% | 5,625 |
| 29. | 83.0% | 62.5% | 5,625 |
| 30. | 83.0% | 62.5% | 5,625 |
| 31. | 83.0% | 81.0% | 5,625 |
| 32. | 83.0% | 81.0% | 5,625 |
| 33. | 75.0% | 57.5% | 5,625 |
| 34. | 75.0% | 57.5% | 5,625 |
| 35. | 83.0% | 81.0% | 5,625 |
| 36. | 83.0% | 81.0% | 5,625 |
| 37. | 83.0% | 81.0% | 5,625 |
| 38. | 78.0% | 75.5% | 5,625 |
| 39. | 78.0% | 72.0% | 5,625 |
| 40. | 78.0% | 72.0% | 5,625 |
| 41. | 78.0% | 72.0% | 5,625 |
| 42. | 83.0% | 73.5% | 5,625 |
| 43. | 78.0% | 72.0% | 5,625 |
| 44. | 78.0% | 71.0% | 5,625 |
| TOTAL: | $ 322,500 | ||
| Average: | 80.3% | 69.6% | |
*271
| Respondent's | ||||||||
| Minimum | Sales | |||||||
| Initial | Additional | Total | Projections | |||||
| Printing | Printings | Copies | (# of Copies) | |||||
| Computer Programs: | ||||||||
| 1. | 5,000 | 40,000 | 45,000 | 200 | ||||
| 2. | 5,000 | 35,000 | 40,000 | 500 | ||||
| Books: | ||||||||
| 1. | 75,000 | 785,000 | 860,000 | 70,000 | ||||
| 2. | 5,000 | 200,000 | 205,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 3. | 20,000 | 165,000 | 185,000 | 250 | ||||
| 4. | 50,000 | 435,000 | 485,000 | 75,000 | ||||
| 5. | 50,000 | 495,000 | 545,000 | 75,000 | ||||
| 6. | 60,000 | 540,000 | 600,000 | 75,000 | ||||
| 7. | 70,000 | 575,000 | 645,000 | 40,000 | ||||
| 8. | 80,000 | 595,000 | 675,000 | 50,000 | ||||
| 9. | 4,000 | 210,000 | 214,000 | 3,500 | ||||
| 10. | 5,000 | 145,000 | 150,000 | 2,500 | ||||
| 11. | 5,000 | 125,000 | 130,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 12. | 30,000 | 230,000 | 260,000 | 20,000 | ||||
| 13. | 4,000 | 100,000 | 104,000 | 4,000 | ||||
| 4,000 | 100,000 | 104,000 | 4,000 | |||||
| 14B | 5,000 | |||||||
| 15. | 5,000 | 95,000 | 100,000 | 8,500 | ||||
| 16. | 7,000 | 75,000 | 82,000 | 400 | ||||
| 17. | 30,000 | 315,000 | 345,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| 18. | 12,500 | 150,000 | 162,500 | 10,000 | ||||
| 19. | 125,000 | 850,000 | 975,000 | 80,000 | ||||
| 20. | 70,000 | 630,000 | 700,000 | 150,000 | ||||
| 21. | 80,000 | 690,000 | 770,000 | 150,000 | ||||
| 22. | 50,000 | 415,000 | 465,000 | 50,000 | ||||
| 23. | 50,000 | 410,000 | 460,000 | 70,000 | ||||
| 24. | 30,000 | 105,000 | 135,000 | 4,000 | ||||
| 25. | 5,500 | 135,000 | 140,500 | 5,000 | ||||
| 26. | 100,000 | 810,000 | 910,000 | 75,000 | ||||
| 27. | 100,000 | 810,000 | 910,000 | 75,000 | ||||
| 28. | 5,000 | 125,000 | 130,000 | 8,000 | ||||
| 29. | 150,000 | 945,000 | 1,095,000 | 50,000 | ||||
| 30. | 70,000 | 510,000 | 580,000 | 40,000 | ||||
| 31. | 120,000 | 840,000 | 960,000 | 45,000 | ||||
| 32. | 90,000 | 630,000 | 720,000 | 33. | 7,500 | 70,000 | 77,500 | 8,500 |
| 34. | 7,500 | 60,000 | 67,500 | 35. | 20,000 | 840,000 | 960,000 | |
| 36. | 150,000 | 1,055,000 | 1,205,000 | 20,000 | ||||
| 37. | 135,000 | 945,000 | 1,080,000 | 25,000 | ||||
| 38. | 5,000 | 390,000 | 395,000 | 4,000 | ||||
| 39. | 22,000 | 80,000 | 102,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 40. | 22,000 | 75,000 | 97,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 41. | 22,000 | 80,000 | 102,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 42. | 17,500 | 240,000 | 257,500 | 15,000 | ||||
| 43. | 20,000 | 195,000 | 215,000 | 7,500 | ||||
| 44. | 2,000 | 15,000 | 17,000 | 70,000 | ||||
| TOTAL: | 2,002,500 | 17,360,000 | 19,462,500 | 1,410,850 | ||||
*272
| Universal's Purchase Price | Respondent's | |||||||
| Cash | Notes | Total | Appraisal | |||||
| Computer Programs: | ||||||||
| 1. | $ 50,000 | $400,000 | $450,000 | $-0- | ||||
| 2. | 50,000 | 350,000 | 400,000 | -0- | ||||
| Books: | ||||||||
| 1. | $ 75,000 | $ 2,725,000 | $ 2,800,000 | $ 307,412 | ||||
| 2. | 7,500 | 317,500 | 325,000 | 3,291 | ||||
| 3. | 25,000 | 1,575,000 | 1,600,000 | -0- | ||||
| 4. | 6,000 | 184,000 | 190,000 | 18,188 | ||||
| 5. | 10,000 | 230,000 | 240,000 | 12,438 | ||||
| 6. | 15,000 | 245,000 | 260,000 | 7,191 | ||||
| 7. | 12,000 | 238,000 | 250,000 | 5,900 | ||||
| 8. | 20,000 | 355,000 | 375,000 | 9,793 | ||||
| 9. | 4,500 | 194,500 | 199,000 | 2,406 | ||||
| 10. | 5,300 | 230,700 | 236,000 | 2,064 | ||||
| 11. | 6,000 | 259,000 | 265,000 | 385 | ||||
| 12. | 5,000 | 170,000 | 175,000 | 11,151 | ||||
| 13. | 7,500 | 202,500 | 210,000 | 12,339 | ||||
| 14A | 3,000 | 87,000 | 90,000 | 7,183 | ||||
| 14B | 4,500 | 115,500 | 120,000 | 18,428 | ||||
| 15. | 7,500 | 242,500 | 250,000 | 26,973 | ||||
| 16. | 6,000 | 234,000 | 240,000 | -0- | ||||
| 17. | 33,000 | 1,615,000 | 1,648,000 | 21,250 | ||||
| 18. | 7,500 | 292,500 | 300,000 | 13,945 | ||||
| 19. | 30,000 | 820,000 | 850,000 | 21,520 | ||||
| 20. | 12,000 | 263,000 | 275,000 | 25,375 | ||||
| 21. | 15,000 | 245,000 | 260,000 | 17,600 | ||||
| 22. | 4,725 | 205,275 | 210,000 | 1,375 | ||||
| 23. | 6,525 | 283,475 | 290,000 | 13,205 | ||||
| 24. | 16,000 | 784,000 | 800,000 | 17,160 | ||||
| 25. | 12,600 | 547,400 | 560,000 | 16,413 | ||||
| 26. | 14,625 | 635,375 | 650,000 | 27,466 | ||||
| 27. | 14,625 | 635,375 | 650,000 | 27,466 | ||||
| 28. | 11,700 | 508,300 | 520,000 | 21,804 | ||||
| 29. | 13,000 | 712,000 | 725,000 | 17,878 | ||||
| 30. | 7,000 | 383,000 | 390,000 | 822 | ||||
| 31. | 18,000 | 787,000 | 805,000 | 40,840 | ||||
| 32. | 17,000 | 740,000 | 757,000 | -0- | ||||
| 33. | 13,500 | 586,500 | 600,000 | 30,755 | ||||
| 34. | 13,500 | 611,500 | 625,000 | 35. | 13,500 | 587,500 | 601,000 | -0- |
| 36. | 17,000 | 735,000 | 752,000 | 15,171 | ||||
| 37. | 20,000 | 886,000 | 906,000 | 22,189 | ||||
| 38. | 12,500 | 542,500 | 555,000 | -0- | ||||
| 39. | 8,500 | 566,500 | 575,000 | 14,589 | ||||
| 40. | 8,500 | 591,500 | 600,000 | 13,281 | ||||
| 41. | 8,500 | 541,500 | 550,000 | 12,379 | ||||
| 42. | 10,000 | 405,000 | 415,000 | 14,390 | ||||
| 43. | 6,500 | 518,500 | 525,000 | 16,209 | ||||
| 44. | 25,000 | 550,000 | 575,000 | 27,405 | ||||
| TOTAL | $ 710,100 | $ 24,933,900 | $ 25,644,000 | $ 895,629 | ||||
1. Unless otherwise specified, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended and in effect during the years in issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
2. The Madison Library, Inc. (hereinafter Madison), a corporation, was owned, directly or indirectly, for the benefit of Cohen's children. In the 1980's Madison formed a subsidiary, Geoffrey Townsend, Ltd. (hereinafter Townsend). Universal was a subsidiary of Townsend, and Cohen was Universal's president.↩
3. For additional information about Cohen's and Bromwell's business activities, see
4. Both Belloff and Gold are attorneys, who were partners in the practice of law from 1970 until 1981.↩
5. For simplicity, hereinafter when we refer to actions taken by Cohen, we are referring to actions taken by him personally and/or by other persons or entities pursuant to his direction or control.↩
6. Gallen was the president of one of the publishers, Richard Gallen & Co., Inc., and its subsidiary, Confucian Press, Inc. In his dealings with Cohen in 1983, he represented his own company and about 30 other publishers who were interested in selling properties to Universal. Gallen or the entities he represented sold properties to Cohen from 1978 until the end of 1983.↩
7. Hereinafter the term "revenues" refers to the amounts received by the publisher from the sale of the books and computer programs produced using the properties.↩
8. The actual term was just short of 8 years because the first lease year ran from May 25, 1983, to March 15, 1984. Thereafter, the lease years started on March 16th and ended on the following March 15th.↩
9. However, the minimum amount of rent for which Series 115 was obligated totaled $ 10,527,000 ($ 610,000 + $ 1,092,500 + $ 322,500 + (1,417,000 x 6)). See Appendix B.↩
10. In general, for 1983, secs. 38 and 46(a)(2)(B) allowed a purchaser of qualified property a credit against income tax of 10 percent of his qualified investment. Universal elected to pass through this investment credit to Series 115 under sec. 48(d), thereby enabling the partners of Series 115 to claim the investment credit against their personal income tax liabilities.↩
11. Moreover, the record does not indicate that any of the other publishers had any input in determining the number of copies shown as "minimum additional printings".↩
12. In 1984, Chadwick changed its name to Parliament Securities, Inc. (hereinafter Parliament) and Belloff and Gold transferred their shares in Parliament to their respective wives.↩
13. It is not evident from the information contained in the Offering Memorandum exactly how petitioner computed the cash flow amount under this third scenario. Nevertheless, for purposes of this opinion we will assume such computations are correct except for the omission noted above.↩
14. Hoag did not use the gross sales projections made by respondent's appraisers. Rather, he based his sales computations on the number of copies that respondent's appraisers estimated would be sold. He then multiplied the number of copies for each book by the "anticipated sales price" listed in the Offering Memorandum.↩
15. Hoag first calculated expected cash flows based on projected sales of 1.2 million copies. Since respondent's experts estimated that a total of 1.4 million copies would be sold (see Appendix B), we have eliminated from consideration Hoag's computation based on the lower number.↩
16.
17. Much of petitioner's brief is directed toward criticizing respondent's case, and in great part ignores the factors upon which petitioner relied. We emphasize that it was petitioner's burden to show that the transactions entered into by Series 115 possessed economic substance; respondent did not have to prove that they did not.↩
18. In fact, this case marks the sixth time that we have had before us claimed deductions and credits arising from Cohen's book publishing programs. In addition to
Moreover, the transactions engaged in by Series 115 were part of the subject matter considered in
19. Petitioner contends that, in May of 1983, when the purchase and lease transactions took place, relevant sales totals for the 1981 Barrister partnerships were not available. We are not convinced that Cohen could not have obtained meaningful sales figures for earlier partnerships by the time he purchased the properties in issue.↩
20. With similar facts before it, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reported that the "conclusion that Cohen wanted to inflate the size of the promissory obligations -- the larger the obligation the greater the resulting investment tax credit -- was inexorable."
21. Petitioner did not present any evidence to show what use Universal made of these funds. However, some of the accountings in evidence indicate that none of these fixed rents were used to reduce the $ 25 million debt.↩
22. As noted earlier, petitioner did not submit the opinion letters for the truth of the matters contained therein. Thus, their content is not taken into account in determining the fair market value of the properties.↩
23. Cohen testified that the cumulative amount of indebtedness to publishers at the end of 1983 for all of the properties he or his various entities had purchased was in the neighborhood of $ 3 1/2 billion dollars.↩
1. Although the Offering Memorandum indicated that title 14 would be W.H. Auden, that title was dropped from the titles involved with Series 115, and was replaced by titles 14A and 14B.↩
2. Respondent's appraiser did not include any sales for titles 32 and 35 because she believed that Universal did not acquire any properties with regard to those books. Both books had been published in 1978-1979, and were off the market by the time Universal acquired its interest in them. In her opinion, at best, Universal acquired only the copies remaining from their first printing.↩
3. Although the Offering Memorandum indicated there would be a title 34, title 34 was dropped from the titles in Series 115.↩
1. Book No. 34 was never acquired by Universal.↩
Knetsch v. United States ( 1960 )
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ( 1993 )
Kapel Goldstein and Tillie Goldstein v. Commissioner of ... ( 1966 )
William S. Skeen and Alison Skeen v. Commissioner of ... ( 1989 )
Rice's Toyota World, Inc. (Formerly Rice Auto Sales, Inc.) ... ( 1985 )
Estate of Sydney S. Baron, Sylvia S. Baron, Administratrix, ... ( 1986 )
James L. Rose and Judy S. Rose v. Commissioner of Internal ... ( 1989 )
Bernard A. Levin, Phyllis Levin, Alan T. Hrabosky, and ... ( 1987 )
Edward N. Gomberg and Helen E. Gomberg v. Commissioner, ... ( 1989 )
jack-s-james-and-carol-n-james-glen-e-michael-and-sybil-h-michael-af ( 1990 )
hilary-p-gardner-judith-c-gardner-reed-clark-audrey-clark-dominick-a ( 1992 )
in-re-mdl-731-tax-refund-litigation-of-organizers-and-promoters-of ( 1993 )
In Re Tax Refund Litigation ( 1991 )
E.A. Brannen and Frances K. Brannen v. Commissioner of ... ( 1984 )
Warner R. Waddell and Jeanette I. Waddell v. Commissioner ... ( 1988 )
Carol W. Hilton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ( 1982 )
independent-electric-supply-inc-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue ( 1986 )
John W. Barnard & June W. Barnard, Earl D. Kay, Jr. & Nancy ... ( 1984 )