DocketNumber: Docket No. 29354-82.
Citation Numbers: 47 T.C.M. 844, 1984 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 666, 1984 T.C. Memo. 10
Filed Date: 1/4/1984
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/20/2020
*666
(2) Additions to tax are imposed under sec. 6653(b) (fraud),
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Addition to Tax Year Deficiency Sec. 6653(b) Sec. 6654(a) 1975 $886.00 $443.00 $38.20 1976 1,121.00 560.50 41.75 1977 1,002.00 501.00 35.69 1978 7,309.03 3,654.52 194.93 1979 1,247.00 623.50 51.96 1980 581.00 290.50 37.09
*669 On or about December 23, 1976, petitioner sold a tract of land on an installment basis, with interest required to be paid. In 1978, the terms of payment were renegotiated, and the buyer paid petitioner in full for the land. During the years in issue, petitioner received long-term capital gain and interest on account of this 1976 sale (or the 1978 renegotiation) in the amounts set forth in table 2.
Table 2 | ||
Year | Long-Term Capital Gain | Interest |
1977 | $ 2,457.39 | $1,719.02 |
1978 | 26,040.44 | 1,443.09 |
$28,497.83 | $3,162.11 |
Petitioner did not file Federal individual income tax returns for any of the years 1975 through 1980.
Petitioner's failure to report the above-noted interest income (for each of the years 1975 through 1980) and capital gain income (for 1977 and 1978) was fraudulent and with intent to evade tax. These omissions resulted in underpayments of income tax for each of the years in issue. His failure to pay his income tax liabilities for each of the years 1975 through 1980 was fraudulent and with intent to evade tax.
As to the additions to tax under section 6653(b) *670 that petitioner has an underpayment for each of the years in issue, and that some part of each such underpayment is due to fraud. Section 7454(a)
Fraud is an actual intentional wrongdoing, and the intent*671 required is the specific purpose to evade a tax believed to be owing. E.g.,
As to the existence of an underpayment for each of the years in issue, we conclude (and we have found) that respondent has proven this fact, based on the facts deemed admitted under Rule 37(c). As to the existence of fraud as to some part of each such underpayment, we conclude (and we have found), following
We hold for respondent. An appropriate order granting respondent's motion under
1. Unless indicated otherwise, all section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as in effect for the years in issue.↩
2. Unless indicated otherwise, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
3. SEC. 6653. FAILURE TO PAY TAX.
* * *
(b) Fraud.--If any part of any underpayment (as defined in subsection (c)) of tax required to be shown on a return is due to fraud, there shall be added to the tax an amount equal to 50 percent of the underpayment. * * *
[The subsequent amendment of this provision by section 325(a) of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, Pub. L. 97-248, 96 Stat. 324, 616, does not affect the instant case.] ↩
4. SEC. 7454. BURDEN OF PROOF IN FRAUD, FOUNDATION MANAGER, AND TRANSFEREE CASES.
(a) Fraud.--In any proceeding involving the issue whether the petitioner has been guilty of fraud with intent to evade tax, the burden of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Secretary.
[This language reflects a 1976 amendment which does not affect the instant case.]↩
5.
6. As to 1973 and 1974, see