DocketNumber: Docket No. 18327-80
Filed Date: 3/22/1983
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/21/2020
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILBUR,
In his statutory notice of deficiency dated July 3, 1980 respondent*632 determined the following deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income tax and additions to tax:
Addition to Tax | ||||
Year | Deficiency | Sec. 6653(b) 1976 | $2,108 | $1,054.00 |
1977 | 2,317 | 1,158.50 | ||
Totals | $4,425 | $2,212.50 |
Petitioner filed a timely petition invoking the jurisdiction of this Court. The petition does not raise any genuine issue of material fact relating to petitioner's Federal income tax liability. The facts contained in the petition are as follows:
(a) Petitioner did not have any "gain" for any of the years at issue;
(b) Petitioner's activities were all on an equal exchange basis during each of the years at issue;
(c) On oath and affirmation, and under penalties of perjury petitioner declares he had no gain whatsoever in 1976 or 1977.
In his answer to the petition, respondent alleged facts designed to show that a part of the 1976 and 1977 underpayments were due to fraud within the meaning of section 6653(b). Petitioner's reply generally denied the allegations of respondent's answer, but*633 alleged no new facts to support that denial. On July 27, 1981 respondent filed a request for admissions pursuant to Rule 90;
All of the arguments raised by the petition and subsequent motions are without merit. Wages are subject to the Federal income tax under the clear language of section 61(a)(1).
Respondent has the burden of proving that at least some of petitioner's underpayment of tax in 1976 and 1977 was due to fraud with intent to evade tax. Sections 7454(a); 6653(b); Rule 142(b). Respondent must prove fraud by clear and convincing evidence, showing that the petitioner acted with the specific intent to evade a tax believed to be owing.
The facts deemed admitted under Rule 90(c) show that petitioner was employed by the United States Postal Service in his home town of Elkhart, Indiana. In 1976 he earned $13,658.11 in salary, and some $323.89 was withheld for*635 Federal income taxes. On Forms W-4 filed during that year petitioner claimed 99 exemptions. In 1977 petitioner earned $14,568.33 in his job at the Postal Service. He filed a W-4E claiming exemption from income tax withholding; no income tax was withheld. Petitioner filed a document purporting to be an individual income tax return for 1976, but this did not constitute a legal return.
We hold, therefore, that respondent has carried his burden of proving fraud and that, as there is no genuine issue of material fact regarding either the deficiency or the fraud, respondent's motion for summary judgment will be granted.
1. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended and in effect during the years at issue, unless otherwise noted.↩
2. All references to the Rules are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
3. During the tax year 1976 petitioner had a wife, Jane E. Thorpe, and two dependent children whom he supported. His wife died in 1977.↩