DocketNumber: No. 9220-04
Citation Numbers: 94 T.C.M. 380, 2007 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 310, 2007 T.C. Memo. 307
Judges: "Vasquez, Juan F."
Filed Date: 10/10/2007
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/21/2020
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VASQUEZ, Judge: This case is before the Court on respondent's motion for summary judgment pursuant to
In
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in
To reflect the foregoing,
An appropriate order and decision will be entered.
1. Unless otherwise indicated, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, and all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue.↩
2. Respondent concedes that no penalty pursuant to
3. In At the outset, we think that it is important to note that considering Antarctica not to be a "foreign country" is compatible with the general statutory scheme. Notably,
HCSC-Laundry v. United States , 101 S. Ct. 836 ( 1981 )
Dave Arnett v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 473 F.3d 790 ( 2007 )
Specking v. Comm'r , 117 T.C. 95 ( 2001 )
Arnett v. Comm'r , 126 T.C. 89 ( 2006 )
Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 17 F.3d 965 ( 1994 )