IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON NOVEMBER SESSION, 1996 STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) No. 02C01-9512-CR-00358 Appellee ) ) SHELBY COUNTY vs. ) ) Hon. Joseph B. Brown, Jr., Judge DARYL CONNER, ) Appellant ) ) (Robbery) FILED May 21, 1997 For the Appellant: For the Appellee: Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk MELANIE E. TAYLOR CHARLES W. BURSON and Attorney General and Reporter WILLIAM JOHNSON Attorneys at Law MICHAEL J. FAHEY, II 50 Front Street, Suite 1150 Assistant Attorney General Memphis, TN 38103 Criminal Justice Division 450 James Robertson Parkway Nashville, TN 37243-0493 WILLIAM GIBBONS District Attorney General DAVID SHAPIRO GLEN BAITY Asst. District Attorneys General Criminal Justice Complex Third Floor, 201 Poplar Memphis, TN 38103 OPINION FILED: AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20 David G. Hayes Judge OPINION The appellant, Daryl Conner, was convicted by a Shelby County jury of robbery. The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the evidence adduced at trial is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. On May 9, 1994, Mrs. Lois Boggan, who was eighty-four years old, was at home cooking dinner. Two men entered her kitchen through a back door and forced Mrs. Boggan’s wedding band and engagement ring from her hand. The assailants fled when Mrs. Boggan’s husband came into the room. One week later, Mrs. Boggan positively identified the appellant in a photographic lineup as one of the assailants. She again identified the appellant at trial. Additionally, on the evening of the offense, a neighbor observed two men run from the Boggan’s house and drive away in a car matching the description of a car owned by the co-defendant, David Parrish. Parrish testified at trial that he and the appellant committed the robbery. After thoroughly reviewing the record, the briefs, and the law governing the issue presented by the appellant, we conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support the finding by the trier of fact of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that no error of law requiring a reversal of the judgment is apparent. Accordingly, pursuant to Ct. of Crim. App. Rule 20, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. ____________________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, Judge CONCUR: _____________________________ GARY R. WADE, Judge _____________________________ WILLIAM M. BARKER, Judge 2