Home Builders Assoc. of Middle TN v. Maury Co.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE
July 2000 Session
HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE, ET AL. v.
MAURY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ET AL.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County
No. 8595 Stella L. Hargrove, Judge
No. M1999-02383-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 31, 2000
WILLIAM C. KOCH , JR., J., concurring.
I concur with Section III of the court’s opinion. However, I decline to join in Section II
because the plaintiffs in this case do not have standing to challenge the constitutionality of the Maury
County Adequate Facilities Tax1 on the ground that it interferes with a person’s “natural right” to
erect “shelter from the elements . . . upon his own real property.”
Courts should decline to grant relief in cases that do not involve a genuine, existing
controversy. State ex rel Lewis v. State, 208 Tenn. 534, 537, 347 S.W.2d 47, 48 (1961); McIntyre
v. Traughber, 884 S.W.2d 134, 137 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). We routinely decline to render advisory
opinions, Super Flea Market of Chattanooga, Inc. v. Olsen, 677 S.W.2d 449, 451 (Tenn. 1984);
Parks v. Alexander, 608 S.W.2d 881, 892 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980), or to decide abstract legal
questions. State ex rel. Lewis v. State, 208 Tenn. at 538, 347 S.W.2d at 48-49; Eyring v. East Tenn.
Baptist Hosp., 950 S.W.2d 354, 359 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). Accordingly, the courts should refrain
from deciding constitutional issues in the absence of an actual controversy requiring them to address
the question. West v. Carr, 212 Tenn. 367, 382, 370 S.W.2d 469, 475 (1963).
In order to have an actual, live controversy, the parties must have a sufficiently personal stake
in the resolution of the dispute to warrant the exercise of the court’s power. Metropolitan Air
Research Testing Auth., Inc. v. Metropolitan Gov’t, 842 S.W.2d 611, 615 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992);
Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc. v. City of Oak Ridge, 644 S.W.2d 400, 402 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1982).
Parties may establish that they have a personal stake in a dispute by demonstrating that they have
sustained some actual or threatened injury to one of their rights, that the injury was caused by the
challenged conduct, and that the injury is one for which a judicial remedy of some sort is available.
In re Petition of Youngblood, 895 S.W.2d 322, 326 (Tenn. 1995); Tennessee Envtl. Council v. Solid
Waste Disposal Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992).
1
Act of May 30, 1991, ch. 118, 1991 Tenn. Priv. Acts 315.
The primary focus of a standing inquiry is on the party seeking relief and on the nature of the
party’s claims. Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 752, 104 S. Ct. 3315, 3325 (1984); Fifteenth Judicial
Dist. Unified Bar Ass’n v. Glasgow, No. M1996-00020-COA-R3-CV, 1999 WL 1128847, at *2
(Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 1999) (No Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed). While we do not inquire
into the likelihood that the claim will succeed, we examine the substance of the claim to determine
whether the plaintiff has articulated an injury-in-fact.
The plaintiffs in this case are two real estate developers and a contractors’ trade association.
Their constitutional challenge to the Maury County Adequate Facilities Tax is based solely on their
assertion that the improvement of property and the erection of shelter by a property owner on his or
her own property is a “natural right” that cannot be taxed as a privilege. Assuming for the sake of
argument that this Whitman-esque claim has some substance, the plaintiffs have not, and when
questioned during oral argument could not, demonstrate any direct connection between their business
activities and the right they assert. Plainly stated, they are in the business of building houses for
resale at a profit; they are not building shelter for themselves on their own property. The lack of
connection between the plaintiffs’ activities and the asserted constitutional interest deprive them of
standing.
It might also be argued that even though the contractors and their trade association have not
asserted a right which they themselves possess, they should be permitted to assert the rights of third
persons who do possess the right. This argument likewise has no merit. They cannot base their
standing on the rights of third parties because they have suffered no direct constitutional injury-in-
fact. Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190, 195, 97 S. Ct. 451, 455-56 (1976). In addition, the trade
association cannot demonstrate that its members have standing to sue in their own right. Curve
Elementary Sch. Parent & Teacher’s Org. v. Lauderdale County Sch. Bd., 608 S.W.2d 855, 858
(Tenn. Ct. App. 1980).
Because of the plaintiffs’ lack of standing, I would decline to address the substance of their
claim that home construction is a natural right that cannot be taxed as a privilege. However, I concur
completely with the analysis in Section III of the court’s opinion concluding that the Maury County
Adequate Facilities Tax is not an impact fee.
____________________________
WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
-2-