Helgerson, Mitchel v. Packer Sanitation Services, Inc.

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
AT KNOXVILLE
MITCHEL HELGERSON, Docket No.: 2014-03-0023
Employee,
v. State File No.: 65382-2014
PACKER SANITATION SERVICES, INC., Date of Injury: August 8, 2014
Employer,
And Judge: Pamela B. Johnson
INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF AMERICA,
Insurance Carrier.
EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER FOR MEDICAL BENEFITS
THIS CAUSE came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge upon
the Request for Expedited Hearing filed June 1, 2015, by the Employee, Mitchel
Helgerson (Mr. Helgerson), pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239
(2014). The Court convened an in-person, evidentiary hearing on July 31, 2015. Upon
review of the Request for Expedited Hearing, the evidence presented at the hearing, the
arguments of counsel for the parties, and in consideration of the applicable law, the Court
enters the following order holding that Mr. Helgerson is entitled to medical benefits.
Issues
The parties marked numerous issues on the Dispute Certification Notice (DCN)
filed in this claim. The Court did not decide issues marked on the DCN unless presented
for determination during the Expedited Hearing. The parties agreed that the following
issues exist for determination:
Whether Mr. Helgerson sustained an injury arising primarily out of and in the
course and scope of his employment with Packer Sanitation Services, Incorporated
(PSSI);
If so, whether Mr. Helgerson is entitled to medical benefits and temporary
disability benefits.
1
Stipulation of the Parties
The parties, through counsel, announced to the Court the following stipulation:
• At the time of the injury, Mr. Helgerson's compensation rate was $330.73
per week based on an average weekly wage of$496.07 per week.
Evidence Submitted
The following witnesses provided in-person testimony:
• Mr. Helgerson; and
• Jason Sharp.
The Court admitted into evidence the following:
• EXHIBIT 1: Affidavit of Mitchel Helgerson;
• EXHIBIT 2: Medical Records of Nova Care;
• EXHIBIT 3: First Report of Work Injury, date of injury of August 8, 2014;
• EXHIBIT 4: First Report of Work Injury, date of injury of August 9, 2014;
• EXHIBIT 5: Wage Statement, Form C-41;
• EXHIBIT 6: Panel of Physicians, Form C42;
• EXHIBIT 7: Notice of Change or Termination of Compensation Benefits,
Form C26;
• EXHIBIT 8: Notice of Controversy, Form C27;
• EXHIBIT 9: Collective Exhibits 9a-9d: Disciplinary Reports;
• EXHIBIT 10: Employee Resignation! Termination Form;
• EXHIBIT 11: Letter to Mr. Helgerson, dated November 12, 20 14; and
• EXHIBIT 12: Audio Recording of Telephone Conference with Medcor,
Mr. Helgerson, and Jason Sharp.
The Court designated the following as the Technical Record:
• Petition for Benefit Determination, filed October 18, 2014;
• Dispute Certification Notice, filed December 3, 2014;
• Request for Initial Hearing, filed January 29, 2015;
• Preliminary Initial Hearing Order, filed March 4, 2015;
• Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, filed May 6, 2015;
• Order Amending Scheduling Order, filed May 19, 2015;
• Request for Expedited Hearing, filed June 1, 2015;
• Motion to Quash Request for Expedited Hearing, filed June 4, 2015;
2
• Response in Opposition to Request for Expedited Hearing, filed June 9,
2015;
• Order Denying Motion to Quash, filed July 2, 2015;
• Agreed Order Amending the Amended Scheduling Order, filed July 21,
2015;and
• Post-Expedited Hearing Brief, filed August 17,2015. 1
The Court did not consider attachments to the above filings unless admitted into
evidence during the Expedited Hearing. The Court considered factual statements in the
above filings and any attachments to them as allegations unless established by the
evidence.
History of Claim
Mr. Helgerson is a thirty-eight-year-old resident of Knox County, Tennessee.
PSSI contracted with Custom Foods to clean its facility located in Knoxville, Tennessee.
Custom Foods prepares, packages, and sells various foods, soups, and sauces.
Mr. Helgerson worked for PSSI as a laborer beginning in July 2013. PSSI
promoted Mr. Helgerson to lead person in May 2014. Mr. Helgerson worked the night
shift.
On the evening of August 8, 2014, Mr. Helgerson reported for work at Custom
Foods and began cleaning in the "Tray Room." Shortly after midnight (August 9, 2014),
Mr. Helgerson stepped off a step stool and his right foot slipped. He felt a pop in his
right knee followed by immediate pain. (Ex. 1.)
The parties dispute when Mr. Helgerson provided notice of the work incident to
PSSI. However, by August 13, 2014, PSSI received notice that Mr. Helgerson allegedly
sustained a right-knee injury during the course of his employment. (Ex. 3 and 4.)
PSSI provided authorized treatment with Dr. J. Donald King, Jr. of Nova Medical
Centers. Dr. King first examined Mr. Helgerson on August 14, 2014. Mr. Helgerson
reported, "He stepped off a step stool and twisted his R [right] knee and felt it pop." Mr.
Helgerson also reported a "previous meniscus repair around 2002" with "no known
impairment or restrictions." Dr. King diagnosed right derangement of anterior hom of
medial meniscus; effusion of joint; and sprain of medial collateral ligament of knee. Dr.
King recommended physical therapy and a knee brace. Dr. King released Mr. Helgerson
to return to work with restrictions. (Ex. 2 at 9-11.)
1
PSSI's counsel filed a Post-Expedited Hearing Brief on August 17,2015. PSSI did not request permission to file a
post-hearing brief. Rule 6.02 of the Court's Practices and Procedures provides, "The use of post-hearing briefs for
Expedited Hearings and Compensation Hearings is permitted only in extraordinary circumstances and with approval
of the assigned Judge." Accordingly, the Court did not review or consider PSSI's Post-Expedited Hearing Brief.
3
Mr. Helgerson remained under the care of Dr. King. On August 28, 2014, Mr.
Helgerson returned to Dr. King and reported an "episode in [physical therapy] yesterday
with weight shifts and popping catch on medial aspect of [right] knee causing increased
pain." Dr. King recommended that Mr. Helgerson continue physical therapy and ordered
a right-knee MRI scan. Mr. Helgerson remained on restricted duty. (Ex. 2, pp. 4-8.)
Mr. Helgerson returned to Dr. King following the right-knee MRI scan. Dr. King
reviewed the MRI, which showed: "I. Large bucket handle tear, medial meniscus; 2. 1cm
cyst, ganglion versus parameniscal cyst adjzcent [sic] to the anterior root medial
meniscus; 3. High grade ACL tear, Suspect chronic; 4. Small to moderate joint effusion;
[and] 5. Minimal chondromalacia." Dr. King recommended that Mr. Helgerson continue
physical therapy, and referred him to an orthopedic physician for consultation. Mr.
Helgerson remained on restricted duty until his return appointment on September 12,
2014. (Ex. 2 at 1-2.)
On September 15, 2014, PSSI issued a Notice of Controversy, Form C-27, and
Notice of Change or Termination of Compensation Benefits, Form C-26, stating,
"Employer's report of mechanism of injury is inconsistent with the previous report to the
supervisor and injuries as identified by the authorized doctor." PSSI notified Mr.
Helgerson ofthe denial on September 15, 2014. (Ex. 7-8.)
Mr. Helgerson filed a Petition for Benefits Determination on October 28, 2014.
The parties did not resolve the disputed issues through mediation and the Mediating
Specialist filed the Dispute Certification Notice on December 3, 2014. On June 1, 2015,
Mr. Helgerson filed a Request for Expedited Hearing. This Court conducted an in-
person, evidentiary hearing on July 31, 2015.
During the evidentiary hearing, Mr. Helgerson testified that, on the evening of
August 8, 2014, he reported to work for PSSI at Custom Foods. On that evening, he
denied any problems with his right knee. While performing his normal job cleaning
pipes in the Tray Room, he stepped off a step stool and slipped and his right knee
popped. He took a break and called his father to bring him a knee brace, because he
thought at the time that he merely sprained his knee. While on break, he also informed
Adam Welch, the assistant supervisor for PSSI, that he injured his knee but thought it
would be okay.
Mr. Helgerson testified that he worked the following night and told Mr. Welch
that his knee bothered him. He took the next two nights off, but called Jason Sharp, the
Site Manager, each night to report that he was not reporting to work. Mr. Helgerson
testified that, when he next reported to work, he told Mr. Sharp that he needed to file a
workers' compensation claim. Mr. Helgerson testified that Mr. Sharp wanted him to use
his private health insurance "because he [Mr. Sharp] didn't want to get anyone in trouble
4
for not filing a report in the time they were supposed to."
Mr. Helgerson testified that, following the work incident, he treated for
approximately one and one-half months and worked light duty. PSSI then denied the
claim and Mr. Sharp told Mr. Helgerson that he could not continue working "without
getting a 'Fit for Duty' paper filled out." (See also Ex. 11.) Mr. Helgerson denied that he
quit. He testified that he has not worked since his termination from PSSI.
Mr. Helgerson admitted on cross-examination that he injured his right knee in
approximately 2002 and required surgical repair. He further admitted that this claim was
not his first workers' compensation claim. He made a claim for his prior right-knee
InJury.
Mr. Helgerson, however, denied that he told Mr. Sharp on August 10 that his
right-knee injury was an old injury, also denied that he said to Mr. Sharp that his right
knee required surgery, and further denied that he stated his right knee never fully
recovered 100%. Mr. Helgerson testified that he never told Mr. Sharp about his previous
knee injury. Mr. Sharp learned of his prior knee injury because he attended a doctor's
appointment with Mr. Helgerson, where he discussed the prior knee injury with the
doctor.
Mr. Helgerson instead confirmed that he told Mr. Sharp that he injured his right
knee in the Tray Room at work, and Mr. Sharp told him he could take two days off work.
Mr. Helgerson additionally testified that he told Mr. Welch that he injured his right knee
at work on the night it happened and while putting on the knee brace his father brought to
him.
Mr. Helgerson denied that he was "afraid of being terminated" because "he missed
two days from work." He also denied that he "concocted this story about a workers'
comp injury for fear oflosing [his] job." He further denied that he made a claim to "save
[his] job and get some free medical bills." ·
Mr. Sharp testified that he did not work the evening of Friday, August 8, 2014.
However, his supervisor, Mr. Welch, worked the evening of August 8 and did not advise
Mr. Sharp of any injury involving Mr. Helgerson. On Wednesday, August 13, Mr.
Helgerson approached Mr. Sharp and advised that he injured his right knee "sometime
after midnight on August 9th." In response, with Mr. Helgerson present, Mr. Sharp
placed a call to MedCor to report Mr. Helgerson's work injury. Mr. Sharp questioned the
compensability of Mr. Helgerson's injury "because it had not been reported yet ... until,
until that night."
Mr. Sharp testified that he worked with Mr. Helgerson on August 10, observed
him wearing a knee brace, and asked him for an explanation. Mr. Helgerson told Mr.
5
Sharp that "it was a prior injury and his knee was sore." Mr. Sharp further testified Mr.
Helgerson told him that he sustained a prior knee injury, which required surgery, and did
not heal 100%. Mr. Sharp denied that Mr. Helgerson referenced the August 9 work
injury during the August 10 discussion. Mr. Sharp testified that Mr. Helgerson did not
report to work as scheduled on Monday, August 11, or Tuesday, August 12.
Mr. Sharp further testified that PSSI issued "Employee Disciplinary Reports"
involving Mr. Helgerson for tardiness. (See also Ex. 9a-9c.) Subsequent to the issuance
of the disciplinary reports, Mr. Sharp admitted that PSSI promoted Mr. Helgerson to lead
person in May 2014.
Mr. Sharp testified that, on August 14, 2014, PSSI disciplined Mr. Helgerson on
the basis that "Employee did not notify management of [the] accident immediately." (Ex.
9d.) Mr. Sharp testified that Mr. Helgerson did not appear for work and did not call in to
report his absence for three days. After the three-day "no call/ no show," PSSI completed
the "Employee Resignation/ Termination Form" regarding Mr. Helgerson. (Ex. 10.) The
"Employee Resignation/ Termination Form" noted that Mr. Helgerson "quit" on
December 9, 2014, and last worked on "10-19-14 per benefits." The "Employee
Resignation/ Termination Form" further noted that "[Mr. Helgerson] did not return
FMLA paperwork and did not return to work."
Mr. Helgerson's Contentions
Mr. Helgerson contends that he sustained a right-knee injury on August 9, 2014,
arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment with PSSI. He
timely reported the work injury to Mr. Welch and Mr. Sharp, who excused him from
work for two days. PSSI provided authorized medical treatment. PSSI accepted the
claim as compensable until the authorized treating physician ordered an MRI and referred
Mr. Helgerson to an orthopedic physician. Although Mr. Helgerson sustained a prior
right-knee injury, he did not have right-knee problems for ten to twelve years prior to the
August 9 work injury. Mr. Helgerson did not quit, but PSSI did not allow him to return
to work until he submitted a completed "Fit for Duty" form. Mr. Helgerson is entitled to
medical benefits and temporary disability benefits from the time PSSI placed him off
work.
PSSI's Contentions
PSSI contends that Mr. Helgerson failed to demonstrate that he sustained a work
injury primarily arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment. Mr.
Helgerson is not entitled to any presumption. Mr. Helgerson told Mr. Sharp that he
suffered from a previous injury, which required surgery, and from which he never fully
recovered. Mr. Helgerson did not report a work injury to PSSI until after he missed two
days of work and due to fear of termination for his absences. PSSI asserts that Mr.
6
Helgerson offered conflicting statements as to when the alleged work injury occurred,
and the dates he allegedly reported the work injury to Mr. Sharp and Mr. Welch. PSSI
additionally argues the medical reports show a previous injury to the right knee, but do
not show evidence of a new injury.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Standard Applied
The Workers' Compensation Law shall not be remedially or liberally construed in
favor of either party but shall be construed fairly, impartially and in accordance with
basic principles of statutory construction favoring neither the employee nor
employer. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-116 (2014). An employee need not prove every
element of his or her claim by a preponderance of the evidence in order to obtain relief at
an expedited hearing. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063,
2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.
Mar. 27, 2015). At an expedited hearing, an employee has the burden to come forward
with sufficient evidence from which the trial court can determine that the employee is
likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. ld.
Factual Findings
The Court finds as follows:
• Mr. Helgerson sustained an injury to his right knee shortly after midnight
on August 9, 2014, while in the course and scope of his employment with
PSSI.
• Mr. Helgerson timely reported the work injury to PSSI as required by
Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-201 (2014).
• At the time of the injury, Mr. Helgerson's compensation rate was $330.73
per week based on an average weekly wage of $496.07 per week.
• PSSI provided authorized medical treatment with Dr. King through
September 5, 2014.
• Dr. King assigned work restrictions to Mr. Helgerson of a maximum of one
hour per day of kneeling/ squatting, bending/ stooping, walking, and
climbing stairs/ ladders.
• Dr. King assigned the work restrictions beginning August 14, 2014, and
continued the restrictions through his last documented visit of September 5,
2014.
• While receiving authorized treatment, Mr. Helgerson worked light duty for
PSSI.
• PSSI terminated Mr. Helgerson's workers' compensation benefits effective
7
September 15, 2014.
• PSSI terminated Mr. Helgerson on December 9, 2014, for failure to return
completed "Fit for Duty" paperwork.
Application ofLaw to Facts
To be compensable under the workers' compensation statutes, an injury must arise
"primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment[.]" Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-
6-102(13) (2014). An injury means "an injury by accident ... arising primarily out of
and in the course and scope of employment, that causes death, disablement or the need
for medical treatment of the employee." !d. For an injury to be accidental, it must be
"caused by a specific incident, or set of incidents, arising primarily out of and in the
course and scope of employment, and is identifiable by time and place of occurrence, and
shall not include the aggravation of a preexisting disease, condition or ailment unless it
can be shown to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that the aggravation arose
primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment." Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-
102(13)(A) (2014).
"An injury 'arises primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment'
only if it has been shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the employment
contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing the injury, considering all causes."
Tenn. Code Ann.§ 50-6-102(13)(B) (2014).
Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(1)(A) (2014) provides that an
employer shall furnish to the employee such medical treatment as is "made reasonably
necessary by accident." Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(l)(A) (2014). The opinion of
the treating physician, selected by the employee from the employer's designated panel of
physicians shall be presumed correct on the issue of causation but this presumption shall
be rebuttable by a preponderance of the evidence. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-1 02(13)(E)
(2014).
In the present case, shortly after midnight on August 9, 2014, Mr. Helgerson
stepped off a step stool and his right foot slipped. He felt a pop in his right knee followed
by immediate pain. The incident occurred while Mr. Helgerson performed his job duties
for PSSI in the "Tray Room" at Custom Foods. Mr. Helgerson reported the work injury
timely to PSSI and described by time and place how the specific incident occurred. PSSI
initially accepted the injury as compensable and provided authorized medical treatment.
PSSI later denied the claim based upon inconsistencies in how Mr. Helgerson r~ported
the injury to his supervisor and to the authorized treating physician.
This Court finds Mr. Helgerson credible. Any inconsistencies in his report of the
August 9, 2014 work incident were minor and caused by the fact that the work incident
occurred during an overnight shift, which encompassed two calendar days. The medical
8
records of the authorized treating physician, Dr. King, support Mr. Helgerson's
description of the work incident. Dr. King, however, does not provide an opinion on
causation to allow this Court to determine whether Mr. Helgerson's right-knee injury of
August 9, 2014, arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment
with PSSI. Therefore, while Mr. Helgerson has not proven by a preponderance of the
evidence that he suffered an injury arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of
his employment, he has shown that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. This
Court holds that he satisfied his burden at this interlocutory stage to entitle him to a panel
of orthopedic physicians as recommended by Dr. King.
This Court is unable to make a determination on the issue of temporary disability
benefits. Dr. King assigned work restrictions to Mr. Helgerson of a maximum of one
hour per day of kneeling/ squatting, bending/ stooping, walking, and climbing stairs/
ladders. Dr. King assigned the work restrictions beginning August 14, 2014, and
continued the restrictions through his last documented visit of September 5, 2014. While
receiving authorized treatment, Mr. Helgerson worked light duty for PSSI. However,
PSSI terminated Mr. Helgerson's workers' compensation benefits effective September
15, 2014. PSSI terminated Mr. Helgerson on December 9, 2014, for failure to return
completed "Fit for Duty" paperwork. The record is unclear as to how long Mr.
Helgerson worked light duty before Mr. Sharp advised him that he could not work
without a completed "Fit for Duty" form. As such, Mr. Helgerson failed to establish the
requisite period of temporary disability. Accordingly, this Court holds that Mr.
Helgerson is not entitled to temporary disability benefits at this time. The Court's
decision at this interlocutory stage of the proceedings does not prevent Mr. Helgerson
from pursuing these benefits at a later Compensation Hearing.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
1. PSSI shall provide Mr. Helgerson a panel of orthopedic physicians from which he
may select a physician for evaluation and treatment of any work-related injury
pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204 (2014).
2. Mr. Helgerson is not entitled to temporary disability benefits at this time.
3. The parties or their counsel shall appear for the Status Conference previously
scheduled for Wednesday, September 30,2015, at 9:00a.m. eastern time.
4. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance
with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry
of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3)
(2014). The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of
compliance with this Order to the Bureau by email to
WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after
9
entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within the period
of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance.
5. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers' Compensation
Compliance Unit via email WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov or by calling (615)
253-1471 or (615) 532-1309.
ENTERED this the 20th day of August, 2015.
Workers' Compensation Judge
Status Conference:
A Status Conference was previously set for Wednesday, September 30, 2015, at
9:00a.m. eastern time with Judge Pamela B. Johnson, Court of Workers Compensation
Claims. You must dial 855-543-5041 toll free or 865-594-0091 to participate in the
Status Conference.
Please Note: You must call in at the scheduled date/time to participate. Failure to
call in may result in a determination of the issues without your further participation.
Right to Appeal:
Tennessee Law allows any party who disagrees with this Expedited Hearing Order
to appeal the decision to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. To file a Notice of
Appeal, you must:
1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: "Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal."
2. File the completed form with the Court Clerk within seven business days of the
date the Workers' Compensation Judge entered the Expedited Hearing Order.
3. Serve a copy of the Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal upon the opposing party.
4. The appealing party is responsible for payment of a filing fee in the amount of
$75.00. Within ten calendar days after the filing of a notice of appeal, payment
must be received by check, money order, or credit card payment. Payments can be
made in person at any Bureau office or by United States mail, hand-delivery, or
other delivery service. In the alternative, the appealing party may file an Affidavit
10
of Indigency, on a form prescribed by the Bureau, seeking a waiver of the filing
fee. The Affidavit of Indigency may be filed contemporaneously with the Notice
of Appeal or must be filed within ten calendar days thereafter. The Appeals Board
will consider the Affidavit of lndigency and issue an Order granting or denying
the request for a waiver of the filing fee as soon thereafter as is
practicable. Failure to timely pay th filing fee or file the Affidavit of lndigency
in accordance with this section shall result in di missal of the appeal.
5. The parties, having the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal,
may request, from the Court Clerk, the audio recording of the hearing for the
purpose of having a transcript prepared by a licensed court reporter and filing it
with the Court Clerk within ten calendar days of the filing of the Expedited
Hearing Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, the parties may file a joint statement of
the evidence within ten calendar days of the filing of the Expedited Hearing
Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and
accurate account of what transpired in the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
and must be approved by the workers' compensation judge before the record is
submitted to the Clerk of the Appeals Board.
6. If the appellant elects to file a position statement in support of the interlocutory
appeal, the appealing party shall file such position statement with the Court Clerk
within three business days of the filing of the Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,
specifying the issues presented for review and including any argument in support
thereof. If the appellee elects to file a response in opposition to the interlocutory
appeal, appellee shall do so within three business days of the filing of the
appellant's position statement.
11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was
sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on this the 20th day
of August, 20 15.
Name Certified Via Via Service sent to:
Mail Fax Email
D. David Sexton, Esq. X dsexton@sextonandwxkoff.com
megan@,sextonandwvkoff.com
Charles W. Gilbreath II, X cgilbreath@noogalaw .com
Esq.
Scott N. Davis, Esq. X sdavis@fleissnerfin11. com
PENNYSHRUM,COURTCLERK
wc.courtclerk@tn.gov
12