Bland, Cody v. Mike Chitwood

FILED
Jul~f 24,2017
TN COURTOF
1\ ORKIRS' COMHI!:. . ATION
ClLAIMS
Tim.e·2 :29PM
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
AT NASHVILLE
Cody Bland, ) Docket No. 2016-06-1686
Employee, )
v. ) State File No. 68258-2016
Mike Chitwood, )
Employer. ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer
EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING REQUESTED RELIEF
This matter came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge on July
19, 2017, upon the Request for Expedited Hearing filed by Cody Bland. The central legal
issues are whether Mr. Bland suffered an injury arising primarily out of and in the course
and scope of his employment with Mike Chitwood and whether he worked as an
employee or a subcontractor. A secondary issue is whether Mr. Bland qualifies for
benefits from the Uninsured Employers Fund.
The Court holds Mr. Bland came forward with sufficient evidence to establish
that his injury arose primarily out of his employment with Mr. Chitwood and he worked
as an employee rather than a subcontractor. Thus, he is entitled to workers'
compensation benefits. However, the Court cannot find at this time that he satisfied the
statutory factors for applying for benefits from the UEF on the present record, as he did
not provide the Bureau timely notice.
History of Claim
Mr. Bland, a resident of Goodlettsville, Tennessee, began working for Mr.
Chitwood in May 2016 as a laborer installing hardwood flooring. He worked full-time at
the times and places that Mr. Chitwood set, earning an average weekly wage of $600 in
cash. Mr. Chitwood provided the tools and materials. Mr. Bland's affidavit states that
Mr. Chitwood was a subcontractor for McGrath Brothers Flooring. 1
1
Mr. Bland introduced no additional evidence to substantiate the business/employment relationship
between Mr. Chitwood and McGrath. By joint stipulation, this Court previously entered an order
conditionally dismissing Mr. Bland's case as to McGrath Brothers Flooring and Rick McGrath.
Mr. Bland testified that, on June 20, while using a table saw, the blade made
contact with a knot in the wood, jerked and severely cut his left hand. He sought
emergency treatment at Centennial Medical Center until the Air Evac Lifeteam flew him
to Vanderbilt University Hospital. At Vanderbilt, Dr. Douglas Weikert surgically
repaired the hand. Post-operatively, Mr. Bland saw Dr. Weikert and participated in
occupational therapy.
Dr. Weikert provided an affidavit regarding his treatment. (Ex. 2 at 1-3.) He
stated that he excused Mr. Bland from work from June 21 through September 21 and
afterward placed Mr. Bland on restricted duty. Dr. Weikert concluded the injury "arises
primarily out of the employment, meaning that more than 50 percent of the injury is due
to the employment, considering all causes." The affidavit additionally said Mr. Bland is
in need of further orthopedic care. Mr. Bland confirmed in his testimony that he believes
his hand is only about "eighty percent" healed.
Mr. Bland's treatment resulted in medical bills totaling $78,904.31. The sums
included: 1) Air Evac, $33,287.47; 2) Centennial Medical Center, $5,087.93; 3)
Peakview Emergency Physicians, $1,776.00; 4) Radiology Alliance, P.C., $30.00; 5)
Vanderbilt Medical Center, $38,639.00; and 7) Publix Pharmacy, $83.91. !d. at 74-90.
To obtain relief from these bills and other assistance, Mr. Bland filed a Petition for
Benefit Determination on September 2. Upon receipt of the PBD, the Bureau initiated an
investigation with the UEF to determine whether Mr. Chitwood carried workers'
compensation insurance. A UEF investigator completed an Expedited Request for
Investigation (Ex. 3), concluding there was no workers' compensation policy on the date
of injury. Per the report, Mr. Chitwood said he was on the Exemption Registry and did
not carry workers' compensation. The investigator asked if he had a copy of Mr. Bland's
certificate of insurance or proof of exemption, and Mr. Chitwood replied that he did not.
The report noted Mr. Chitwood "finally agreed he should have made sure Mr. Bland was
compliant before hiring him." The investigator additionally made a "seven factors
determination" as follows: 1) Mr. Chitwood was a subcontractor for McGrath Brothers
and hired workers as needed; 2) Mr. Chitwood controlled the right to terminate; 3) Mr.
Chitwood paid Mr. Bland as a "1099" worker in cash; 4) Mr. Chitwood controlled the
selection and hiring of helpers; 5) Mr. Chitwood furnished the tools and equipment, and
McGrath Brothers furnished the materials; 6) Mr. Chitwood set the hours of work; and, 7)
Mr. Bland was not free to offer his services to other entities. !d. at 5-6.
Throughout this case, Mr. Chitwood failed to participate. He did not appear at the
Expedited Hearing despite receiving written notice via certified mail. Mr. Bland testified
that Mr. Chitwood was present when he became injured; he witnessed Mr. Bland's
bloodied, injured hand but not the accident. Afterward, he never offered to pay for Mr.
Bland's medical care or lost wages, and he terminated him immediately following the
2
accident. After Dr. Weikert placed Mr. Bland on limited duty, Mr. Bland attempted to
return to work for two employers, Kroger and Goodwill respectively, but was unable to
perform the assigned job duties due to the restrictions. The first job, with Kroger, began
on January 1, 2017. Mr. Bland successfully returned to work for MGM Industries.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
In order to grant the relief Mr. Bland seeks, the Court must apply the following
legal principles. Mr. Bland bears the burden of proof on all prima facie elements of his
claim. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2016). At an expedited hearing, Mr.
Bland has the burden to come forward with sufficient evidence from which this Court can
determine he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human
Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).
Compensability
Applying these general principles to the issue of the compensability of Mr.
Bland's claim, the Workers' Compensation Law defines an "injury" as '"an injury by
accident ... arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment that
causes ... the need for medical treatment." Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14). Further,
an injury is '"accidental" only if the injury is caused by a specific incident, or set of
incidents, arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment.
Here, Mr. Bland's undisputed testimony proves that, while working for Mr.
Chitwood on June 21, he injured his left hand, resulting in the need for surgery and
rehabilitation. The medical records support his account of how he became injured, and
he presented as an honest and credible witness. Accordingly, the Court holds Mr. Bland
sustained an accidental injury caused by a specific incident arising primarily out of and in
the course and scope of his employment with Mr. Chitwood.
With regard to Mr. Bland's employment status, Mr. Chitwood previously argued
to the UEF investigator that Mr. Bland was a "subcontractor" or a '"1 099 worker" rather
than an employee for purposes of the Workers' Compensation Law. To make this
determination, the statute provides that the Court shall consider:
(a) The right to control the conduct of the work;
(b) The right of termination;
(c) The method of payment;
(d) The freedom to select and hire helpers;
(e) The furnishing of tools and equipment;
(f) Self-scheduling of working hours; and
(g) The freedom to offer services to other entities.
3
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(12)(D)(i). Applying these factors to Mr. Bland's
uncontroverted testimony and the UEF investigator's findings, the Court holds he was
Mr. Chitwood's employee rather than a subcontractor. Mr. Bland performed work at an
hourly wage for a forty-hour work week, which precluded other employment. Mr.
Chitwood provided the tools, and he set the work hours. It appears Mr. Chitwood
controlled all aspects of the worksite. The Court further holds, based upon the UEF
investigator's findings, that Mr. Chitwood is a construction services provider as generally
defined in Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-901(5) and that he failed to secure
workers' compensation insurance or to determine that Mr. Bland is listed on the
Exemption Registry as required by section 50-6-902.
Requested Relief
Turning first to the medical benefits Mr. Bland seeks, the Court holds that under
Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(1)(A), Mr. Chitwood must provide him
with past and continuing reasonable and necessary medical treatment related to the
injury. The Court appoints Dr. Weikert as the authorized treating physician. The Court
further finds treatment with Centennial, Peakview Emergency Physicians, Radiology
Alliance, Air Evac, Vanderbilt, Dr. Weikert and Publix appropriate because Mr.
Chitwood failed to provide Mr. Bland medical care, requiring him to seek treatment on
his own. See Young v. Young Elec., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *16
(May 25, 20 16). The Court holds Mr. Chitwood responsible for immediate payment of
these bills.
Next, Mr. Bland additionally seeks temporary total and partial disability benefits.
See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(1)-(2). In Jones v. Crencor, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp.
App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015), the Appeals Board held: "An injured worker
is eligible for temporary disability benefits if: ( 1) the worker became disabled from
working due to a compensable injury; (2) there is a causal connection between the injury
and the inability to work; and (3) the worker established the duration of the period of
disability." While temporary total disability refers to the employee's condition while
completely unable to work because of the injury until the worker recovers as far as the
nature of the injury permits, "[t]emporary partial disability refers to the time, if any,
during which the injured employee is able to resume some gainful employment but has
not reached maximum recovery." Frye v. Vincent Printing Co., et a!., 2016 TN Wrk.
Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 34, at *15-16 (Aug. 2, 2016).
Here, the Court holds that Mr. Bland became disabled at work due to a
compensable injury and a causal connection exists between the injury and his inability to
work. With regard to the remaining factor for consideration, Mr. Bland introduced
medical records into evidence excusing him from work from June 21 through September
21. After September 21, due to the termination, Mr. Chitwood made no effort to
accommodate Mr. Bland's restrictions, forcing him to seek employment elsewhere. The
4
Court finds Mr. Bland was unable to return to work within his restrictions from
September 21 through December 31. Therefore, Mr. Bland has come forward with
sufficient evidence from which this Court concludes that he is likely to prevail at a
hearing on the merits on the issue of temporary disability benefits for the above
timeframe. Mr. Bland's compensation rate is $400 per week or $57.14 per day. He was
restricted from work for 193 days, which totals $11,028.02 immediately due and owing.
Uninsured Employer
Finally, although this Court holds Mr. Chitwood must provide Mr. Bland with past
and ongoing medical and disability benefits, it is unclear whether payment will occur
because Mr. Chitwood did not have workers' compensation insurance at the time of the
accident nor has he made any effort to participate in this case. The Bureau has discretion
to pay limited temporary disability and medical benefits from the UEF to an employee
who: 1) worked for an employer who failed to secure payment of compensation; 2)
suffered an injury primarily arising in the course and scope of employment on or after
July 1, 2015; 3) was a Tennessee resident on the date of the injury; and, 4) "provided
notice to the bureau of the injury and of the failure of the employer to secure the payment
of compensation within a reasonable period of time, but in no event more than sixty (60)
days after the date of the injury[]" Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-801(d)(1)-(4) (Emphasis
added).
Based upon the evidence, the Court finds Mr. Bland was a Tennessee resident on
June 20 and was an employee of Mr. Chitwood for purposes of the Tennessee Workers'
Compensation Law. As of June 20, Mr. Chitwood failed to secure workers'
compensation insurance. Mr. Bland suffered his injury after July 1, 2015, and the Court
holds he is likely to prevail at hearing on the merits that he suffered an injury primarily
within the course and scope of employment. At that time, Mr. Chitwood failed to provide
workers' compensation insurance and likewise paid no medical or temporary disability
benefits for Mr. Bland's claim.
However, the Court finds Mr. Bland provided notice to the Bureau of the injury
and of Mr. Chitwood's failure to secure the payment of compensation seventy-two days
after the date of injury. While the Court is mindful of the physical and financial
hardships Mr. Bland suffered, the plain language of the statute requires notice "in no
event" more than sixty days after the date of injury. Therefore, the Court concludes as a
matter of law that he is not eligible for application for payment by the Bureau. This
ruling does not prevent Mr. Bland from coming forward with additional evidence of
contacts or notice to the Bureau in a subsequent hearing.
5
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
1. Mr. Chitwood shall pay for past medical care in the sums outlined within this
Order. Dr. Weikert shall continue to serve as the authorized treating physician.
Mr. Bland or the medical providers shall furnish any other reasonable, necessary
and related bills to Mr. Chitwood for prompt payment.
2. Mr. Bland is entitled to past temporary disability payments in the amount of
$11,028.02 payable immediately as a lump sum.
3. Mr. Bland is not eligible at this time to receive medical and temporary disability
benefits from the UEF.
4. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on September 11 , 2017, at 9:45 a.m.
Central Time. The parties must call 615-532-9552 or 866-943-0025 toll-free to
participate in the hearing. Failure to appear by telephone may result in a
determination of the issues without your participation.
5. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance
with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry
of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3).
Mr. Chitwood must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the
Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh
business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary
confirmation within the period of compliance may result in a penalty assessment
for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the
Workers' Compensation Penalty Unit by email at
WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.
ENTERED this the 24th day of July, 2017.
Court of Workers' Compensation
6
APPENDIX
Exhibits:
1. Affidavit of Cody Bland
2. Employee Medical records
3. Expedited Request for Investigation Report
4. Memo confirming Mr. Bland's termination
Technical Record:
1. Petition for Benefit Determination, September 2, 20 16
2. Request for Investigation
3. Dispute Certification Notice
4. Request for Expedited Hearing
5. Notice of Expedited Hearing and proof of delivery
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that ·a true and correct copy of this Order was sent to the following
recipients by the following methods of service on this the 24th day of July, 2017.
Name Certified Via Via Service sent to:
Mail Fax Email
Brian Dunigan, X brian@goncelaw .com
Employee's attorney
Mike Chitwood, X Mike Chitwood, Chitwood Floors,
Employer c/o Accurate Tax Service
2606 Eugenia Ave., Suite C
Nashville TN 37211
, Clerk of Court
rkers' Compensation Claims
lerk@tn.gov
7