Randall, Amber M. v. New York Pizza Department, Inc.

FILED
Apr 14, 2020
10:57 AM(ET)
TENNESSEE COURT OF
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CLAIMS
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
AT CHATTANOOGA
Amber M. Randall, ) Docket No.: 2019-01-0763
Employee, )
v. )
New York Pizza Department, Inc., ) State File No.: 101127-2019
Employer, )
and )
Property and Casualty Ins. Co. of ) Judge Thomas Wyatt
Hartford, )
Carrier.
EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER FOR MEDICAL AND TEMPORARY
DISABILITY BENEFITS
(DECISION ON THE RECORD)
This case came before the Court on April 14, 2020, on Ms. Randall's request for
medical and temporary disability benefits. New York Pizza Department, Inc. (NYPD)
urged the Court to deny benefits on grounds of insufficient proof of causation and
because Ms. Randall's injury is idiopathic. The Court held an on-the-record hearing and,
for the reasons below, holds Ms. Randall would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits
regarding her requests.
History of Claim
Ms. Randall worked as a manager for NYPD. On July 11, 2019, she suffered a
right-knee injury that she described by affidavit as follows:
I had a pizza in my hand, I turned to my right to head to the cooler to get
marinara sauce for the pizza. As I was turning to the right and putting my
foot down, I felt a pop in my right knee as I landed on my foot.
Ms. Randall provided a photograph of the area in NYPD's kitchen where she was injured.
She argued the cramped space and the fact that she turned her body while holding a pizza
1
caused her to step awkwardly and twist her knee. Ms. Randall testified that she felt
immediate knee pain so severe that she required assistance to walk to the office. She did
not return to work that night.
Ms. Randall sought care at Fast Access Healthcare the next day. A provider
recorded a history of right-knee pain occurring the previous night without detailing the
mechanism of injury. The provider treated her conservatively, and Ms. Randall returned
to work. NYPD's owner reimbursed Ms. Randall for Fast Access's bill.
In early October, Ms. Randall told NYPD's owner that she needed additional
treatment for worsening knee pain. The owner submitted a claim to NYPD's carrier,
which authorized Ms. Randall to return to Fast Access. The carrier then authorized an
MRI, which revealed a partially tom anterior cruciate ligament, a large bucket-handle tear
of the medial collateral ligament (MCL), and that a fragment from the tom MCL had
lodged in the intercondylar notch. At the visit when Ms. Randall learned the MRI results,
Fast Access recorded that her knee injury occurred when she "twisted wrong at work."
Fast Access referred Ms. Randall to orthopedic surgeon Dr. John Chrostowski.
Dr. Chrostowski recommended surgery due to the MRI findings and took Ms. Randall off
work until December 2. Shortly afterward, the carrier denied further medical benefits,
stating that the injury was idiopathic. Ms. Randall has not worked since she saw Dr.
Chrostowski on October 23.
In support of her claim, Ms. Randall submitted a March 23, 2020 statement from
Dr. Chrostowski that stated:
[I]t is my opinion within a reasonable degree of medical certainty
and considering all causes, that Ms. Randall's right lower extremity
injuries and the aggravation of any right lower extremity pre-existing
conditions, which she suffered about July 11, 2019, arose primarily out
of and in the course and scope of her employment with [NYPD], and that
the employment contributed to more than 50% in causing Ms. Randall's
right knee injuries and the need for medical treatment.
Dr. Chrostowski also wrote that Ms. Randall was not at maximum medical improvement
because she had not undergone surgery. He further stated that Ms. Randall remained
under the off-work restriction he gave on October 23, and that would continue until she
has surgery.
Ms. Randall also submitted bills from Fast Access totaling $413 and from Dr.
Chrostowski for $237. NYPD has not paid temporary disability benefits.
Regarding Ms. Randall's earnings in the fifty-two weeks before her injury, NYPD
2
submitted a wage statement showing a salary of $650 per week. Ms. Randall challenged
this with her 2019 W-2 from NYPD that she claimed showed she earned more than that.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
At an Expedited Hearing, Ms. Randall must present sufficient evidence that she
likely would prevail at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l)
(2019); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Here, Ms. Randall must prove that the tears in her
right knee arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment. After
thorough consideration of the evidence, the Court holds that Ms. Randall met her burden
as to both medical and temporary disability benefits.
Ms. Randall testified that she experienced immediate pain when her knee twisted
as she turned to the right with a pizza in her hand. A Fast Access provider corroborated
this history by noting that Ms. Randall said her injury occurred when she "twisted [the
knee] wrong at work." Dr. Chrostowski considered the description of injury in Ms.
Randall's affidavit and unequivocally concluded that the twisting mechanism caused the
need for surgery.
For its part, NYPD raised two defenses. First, it argued that Dr. Chrostowski did
not himself record a history of the mechanism of Ms. Randall's injuries, and thus he did
not have sufficient information to give a causation opinion. The evidence does not
support NYPD's position. Rather, Dr. Chrostowski's statement makes clear that he was
familiar with the mechanism of Ms. Randall's injury, including the description of injury
she gave in her affidavit. The Court holds Dr. Chrostowski had sufficient information
about the mechanism of Ms. Randall's injury to formulate a causation opinion.
NYPD next argued that Ms. Randall's injury was idiopathic, and thus it did not
arise out of her employment. The Appeals Board held in McCaffrey v. Cardinal
Logistics, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 50, at *9 (Dec. 10, 2015), that an
idiopathic injury is one of unexplained origin or cause and does not arise out of the
employment unless a condition of the employment presents a peculiar hazard that causes
injury. The Board in McCaffrey explained that determining whether an injury is
idiopathic does not require the proximate-cause analysis of negligence cases, but instead
involves a determination of whether the injury arose out of employment hazards.
Based on the evidence, the Court holds Ms. Randall's injury has a known origin-
it occurred when her right knee "twisted wrong" as she turned and stepped to her right
with a pizza in her hand. This mechanism of injury suggests an abnormal and unexpected
bearing of weight on her right knee that distinguishes it from the cases where an
employee suffers an idiopathic injury by simply walking. Further, the Court holds that
the mechanism of working on one's feet and turning with a pizza in hand in a cramped
3
kitchen falls squarely within the risks to which the manager of a pizza restaurant is
exposed. Thus, the Court holds that Ms. Randall will likely prevail at trial in showing
that her injury was not idiopathic but arose primarily out of and in the course and scope
of her employment.
The Court next considers whether Ms. Randall established her entitlement to
medical benefits. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(l)(A) requires that the
employer provide medical treatment free of charge for compensable injuries. Here, the
evidence established that Ms. Randall will likely prevail at trial in showing that NYPD
and its carrier authorized Fast Access to treat her right-knee tears. The Court notes that
NYPD's owner reimbursed Ms. Randall for the initial treatment at Fast Access, and the
carrier later paid for an MRI ordered by Fast Access.
Likewise, the Court finds Ms. Randall will likely prevail in showing entitlement to
the surgery recommended by Dr. Chrostowski. The carrier did not object to Fast
Access's referral to Dr. Chrostowski, so he became the treating physician. See Tenn.
Code App. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(ii). Dr. Chrostowski stated that surgery was necessary to
treat the tears in Ms. Randall's right knee, which he also concluded arose primarily out of
and in the course of her employment. The employer did not rebut Dr. Chrostowski's
opinion. Thus the Court holds that Ms. Randall will likely prevail on the issue of her
surgery recommendation.
Finally, the Court considers Ms. Randall's request for temporary disability
benefits. The evidence is unrebutted that Ms. Randall has not worked since she saw Dr.
Chrostowski on October 23, 2019, and that he continued her off-work status until she has
surgery. Thus, the Court holds Ms. Randall will likely prevail in establishing her
entitlement to temporary total disability benefits from October 23, 2019, until the date
she undergoes surgery. NYPD owes Ms. Randall temporary disability benefits from that
date to the present. These benefits shall continue until Ms. Randall undergoes surgery
and afterward, if Dr. Chrostowski restricts her from working.
Ms. Randall did not provide sufficient evidence of her compensation rate. The
Court questions the accuracy of the wage statement because it is inconsistent with the W-
2 submitted by Ms. Randall. Thus, NYPD shall immediately prepare an accurate wage
statement and provide it to Ms. Randall's attorney. NYPD shall pay temporary disability
benefits at the compensation rate on the revised wage statement. Ms. Randall may file a
motion if she wishes to challenge the compensation rate.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
1. The Court designates Dr. Chrostowski as the authorized treating physician, and
NYPD shall pay for Ms. Randall's treatment, including the recommended surgery.
4
2. NYPD shall pay the medical bills of Fast Access and Dr. Chrostowski. NYPD
shall immediately contact their offices to facilitate payment.
3. NYPD shall complete an accurate wage statement documenting Ms. Randall's
earnings during the fifty-two weeks preceding the date of injury and file it with the
clerk within ten business days of this order, copying Ms. Randall's attorney.
NYPD shall pay accrued and ongoing temporary total disability benefits at that
rate. Ms. Randall may file a motion if she disagrees with the calculation.
4. This case is set for a Status Hearing on July 15, 2020,, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern
Time. The parties must call (615) 741-3061 or toll-free at (855) 747-1721 to
participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without the
party's participation.
5. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance
with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry
of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3),
including compliance of the order to file an accurate wage statement. The
Employer or Carrier must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to
the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh
business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary
confirmation within the period of compliance may result in assessment of a
penalty for noncompliance.
6. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers' Compensation
Compliance Unit via email at WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.
ENTERED April 14, 2020.
JUDGE THOMAS WYATT
Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
5
APPENDIX
Exhibits: The Court admitted the following exhibits into evidence:
1. Two affidavits of Amber Randall
2. Affidavit of Dr. John Chrostowski
3. Records, including bills, of Fast Access Healthcare
4. Records, including bills, of Dr. John Chrostowski/Team Orthopedics
5. Letters from The Hartford
6. Wage Statement
7. 2019 W-2 of Amber Randall
8. Photograph of Amber Randall's workspace
Technical record: The Court considered the following filings:
1. Petition for Benefit Determination
2. Records submitted by Amber Randall
3. Wage Statement submitted by NYPD
4. Dispute Certification Notice
5. Request for Expedited Hearing (Decision on the Record)
6. Position statements of Amber Randall
7. Position statement ofNYPD
8. Docketing Notice
CERTIFICA TE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on April 14, 2020.
Name Certified Email Service sent to:
Mail
Tim Henshaw X tim@mcmahanlawfirm.com
Employee's Attorney laura@Jmcmahanlawfirm.com
Blair Cannon X Blair.cannon@thehartford.com
Employer's Attorney
/s/ Penny Shrum w/permission JD
PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK
wc.courtcler k@tn.gov
6