DocketNumber: 98-0323
Citation Numbers: 988 S.W.2d 739, 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 42, 1998 Tex. LEXIS 141, 1998 WL 716953
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 10/15/1998
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Supreme Court of Texas.
Robert T. Bass, Austin, for Petitioner.
H. Dustin Fillmore, K. Marvin Adams, Fort Worth, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We deny Palo Pinto's petition for review. However, we note that in discussing Rule 21 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the court of appeals held:
[T]he County presented its oral motion to strike Lee's response on the day set for the summary judgment hearing when the trial court was hearing "preliminary matters before we get to the motion for summary judgment." This was not an oral motion "presented during a hearing or trial."
966 S.W.2d 83, 85. We disapprove of this language to the extent the court concluded that Palo Pinto did not present its oral motion *740 to strike during a hearing. See TEX.R. CIV. P. 21.
Lee v. Palo Pinto County , 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 1257 ( 1998 )
in the Matter of N.S., a Juvenile ( 2004 )
Twist v. McAllen National Bank , 248 S.W.3d 351 ( 2007 )
City of Waco v. Lopez , 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 10384 ( 2005 )
Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services v. Carol ... , 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 14817 ( 2013 )