DocketNumber： A-3942
Citation Numbers： 255 S.W.2d 184, 152 Tex. 122, 1953 Tex. LEXIS 497
Judges： Per Curiam
Filed Date： 2/25/1953
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/19/2024
Supreme Court of Texas.
*185 McKool, McDaniel & Bader, Dallas, for petitioners.
Scurry, Scurry & Pace, Dallas, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Only one point of error is presented in petitioners' application for writ of error. It is: "The Court of Civil Appeals erred in holding that petitioners were not entitled to interest on the sum of $3850, the amount deposited in the Court by Respondent."
We approve the holding by the Court of Civil Appeals on the question of interest as presented in the point urged here.
But respondent, as appellant there, presented five other points wholly unrelated to the question of interest which were decided by the Court of Civil Appeals, but which are not presented here. Hence we have no jurisdiction as to them, and our order must be: Application refused, no reversible error.
harry-m-whittington-mercedes-b-whittington-mercedes-gregg-fka-mercedes ( 2015 )
Arete Partners, LP v. Gunnerman , 643 F.3d 410 ( 2011 )
City of Austin v. Harry M. Whittington ( 2015 )
Thomas v. Housing Authority of City of Dallas , 153 Tex. 137 ( 1953 )
Lin v. Houston Community College System , 948 S.W.2d 328 ( 1997 )
City of Houston v. Collins , 1958 Tex. App. LEXIS 1819 ( 1958 )
State v. Dickerson , 1963 Tex. App. LEXIS 2242 ( 1963 )
City of Houston v. Schorr , 1955 Tex. App. LEXIS 1884 ( 1955 )
Asbeck v. Asbeck , 369 S.W.2d 915 ( 1963 )
State v. Griffis , 1957 Tex. App. LEXIS 1651 ( 1957 )
Central Power and Light Company v. Graddy , 1958 Tex. App. LEXIS 1619 ( 1958 )