Judges: JOHN CORNYN, Attorney General of Texas
Filed Date: 3/8/1999
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
Office of the Attorney General — State of Texas John Cornyn The Honorable Elton Bomer Secretary of State Office of the Secretary of State Executive Division P.O. Box 12697 Austin, Texas 78711-2697
Re: Whether, under Business Corporation Act article 5.17, a for-profit domestic business corporation may convert to a Texas nonprofit corporation organized under Texas Revised Civil Statutes articles
Dear Mr. Secretary:
Your predecessor in office asked whether a for-profit business corporation, domestic or foreign, may convert under article 5.17 of the Business Corporation Act to a Texas nonprofit corporation organized under Texas Revised Civil Statutes articles
Your predecessor's questions concern corporate conversion, a method by which a business organization may transform itself into another organizational form without ceasing operations. "Conversion" means
(a) the continuance of a domestic corporation [the converting entity] as, and in the organizational form of, a foreign corporation or other entity [the converted entity]; or
(b) the continuance of a foreign corporation or other entity [the converting entity] as, and in the organizational form of, a domestic corporation [the converted entity].
Tex. Bus. Corp. Act Ann. art. 1.02(8) (Vernon Supp. 1999); see also id. art. 1.02(9), (10) (defining "converted entity" and "converting entity"). The term "other entity" includes "any entity,whether organized for profit or not, that is a corporation (other than a domestic or foreign corporation), limited or general partnership, limited liability company, real estate investment trust, joint venture, joint stock company, cooperative, association, bank, trust, insurance company or other legal entity organized pursuant to the laws of this state or any other state or country." Id. art. 1.02(20) (emphasis added).
Article 5.17 authorizes a corporation to convert in certain circumstances:
A. A domestic corporation may adopt a plan of conversion and convert to a foreign corporation or any other entity if:
(1) the converting entity acts on and its shareholders approve a plan of conversion in the manner prescribed by Article 5.03 of this Act as if the conversion were a merger to which the converting entity were a party and not the survivor;
(2) the conversion (a) is permitted by, or not inconsistent with, the laws of the state or country in which the converted entity is to be incorporated, formed, or organized, and (b) the incorporation, formation, or organization of the converted entity is effected in compliance with such laws;
(3) at the time the conversion becomes effective, each shareholder of the converting entity (other than those who receive payment of their shares under Article 5.12 of this Act [dissenting shareholders]) will, unless otherwise agreed to by that shareholder, own an equity interest or other ownership or security interest in, and be a shareholder, partner, member, owner, or other security holder of, the converted entity;
(4) no shareholder of the domestic corporation will, as a result of the conversion, become personally liable, without the shareholder's consent, for the liabilities or obligations of the converted entity; and
(5) the converted entity shall be incorporated, formed, or organized as part of or pursuant to the plan of conversion.
B. Any foreign corporation or other entity may adopt a plan of conversion and convert to a domestic corporation if:
(1) the conversion is permitted by the laws of the state or country in which the foreign corporation is incorporated, if a foreign corporation is converting;
(2) the conversion is either permitted by the laws under which the other entity is formed or organized or by the constituent documents of the other entity that are not inconsistent with the laws of the state or country in which the other entity is formed or organized, if another entity is converting; and
(3) the converting entity takes all action that may be required by the laws of the state or country under which it is incorporated, formed, or organized and by its constituent documents to effect the conversion.
C. A plan of conversion shall set forth:
. . . .
(4) the manner and basis of converting the shares or other evidences of ownership of the converting entity into shares or other evidences of ownership or securities of the converted entity, or any combination thereof;
. . . .
D. [Optional elements of plan of conversion]
E. [Authorizing corporation to abandon plan of conversion in certain circumstances].
Upon approving the plan of conversion, the converting entity must execute articles of incorporation and attempt to file the articles with the Secretary of State. See id. art. 5.18(A) (listing required elements of articles of conversion). "If the Secretary of State finds that the articles of conversion conform to law" and that he or she has received all necessary filings and has issued all necessary certificates, "the Secretary of State shall," when all required fees and franchise taxes have been paid, "issue a certificate of conversion . . . to the converted entity or its representatives." See id. art. 5.18(C). The conversion generally takes effect when the Secretary of State issues the certificate of conversion. See id. art. 5.19.
Thus, in the conversion process, the converting entity "continue[s] to exist, without interruption," but in the converted entity's organizational form, rather than in the converting entity's organizational form. See id. art. 5.20(A)(1). All of the converting entity's assets and liabilities continue in the converted entity in its new organizational form. See id. art. 5.20(A)(2), (3), (4), (5). "[S]hares and other evidences of ownership in the converting entity that are to be converted into shares, evidences of ownership, or other securities in the converted entity" convert consistently with the entity's plan of conversion. See id. art. 5.20(A)(6).
Your predecessor's questions are narrow, and our response is limited to the situation about which he asked. In the first question he asked only about a nonprofit corporation organized under Texas Revised Civil Statutes articles
A. Whether a for-profit domestic corporation may convert to a nonprofitcorporation organized under Texas Revised Civil Statutes article
We conclude first that a for-profit domestic corporation may convert to a nonprofit corporation organized under Texas Revised Civil Statutes article
(1) Whether Business Corporation Act article 5.17 permits a for-profitdomestic corporation to convert to a nonprofit corporation
The definition of the phrase "other entity" as used in Business Corporation Act article 5.17(A) includes a nonprofit entity, see Tex. Bus. Corp. Act Ann. art. 1.02(A)(20) (Vernon Supp. 1999), and article 5.17 thus explicitly permits a for-profit domestic corporation to convert to a nonprofit corporation. While a few provisions in articles 5.17, 5.18, and 5.20 require that the owners of the converting for-profit domestic corporation hold an equity interest or other ownership or security interest in the converted nonprofit corporation and may, therefore, suggest that a for-profit domestic corporation may not convert to a nonprofit corporation, the legislative intent makes clear the purpose for the law and its proper interpretation.
The legislative history suggests that the legislature intended the provisions to permit a for-profit domestic corporation to convert to a nonprofit corporation to create an atmosphere most favorable to business. Although the conversion provisions were adopted in 1997 when the legislature enacted Senate Bill 555, nearly identical provisions were first introduced to the legislature in 1995 as House Bill 1425. House Bill 1425 proposed "a comprehensive package of amendments to" several corporation and partnership acts, including the Texas Business Corporation Act, and it was the product of the State Bar's Business Law Section and the Business Law Foundation. See House Comm. on Bus. Ind., Bill Analysis, Tex. H.B. 1425, 74th Leg., R.S. (1995); Hearings on Tex. H.B. 1425 Before the House Comm. on Bus. Ind., 74th Leg., R.S. (Mar. 7, 1995) (statement of Representative Brimer, Chair, Committee on Business Industry). According to Dr. Alan Bromberg, representing the Business Law Foundation before the House committee considering the bill, the bill would, among other things, permit greater flexibility in the structure and operation of business. See Hearings on Tex. H.B. 1425 Before the House Comm. on Bus. Ind., 74th Leg., R.S. (Mar. 7, 1995) (statement of Dr. Alan Bromberg, representing the Texas Business Law Foundation). Professor Bromberg described the conversion provisions of the bill in particular as permitting "virtually universal convertability of one form of business organization to another." Id. Curtis Huff, the Chair of the Business Law Section of the State Bar, also testified to the House committee that passage of House Bill 1425 would enhance Texas' reputation as a flexible state in which to incorporate. See id. (statement of Curtis Huff, representing Business Law Section of Texas State Bar). The House of Representatives passed the bill to engrossment, but the full Senate apparently did not vote on the bill, although the Senate Committee on Economic Development had recommended the bill's adoption by the full Senate. See Hearings on Tex. H.B. 1104 Before the House Comm. on Bus. Ind., 75th Leg., R.S. (Mar. 5, 1997) (testimony of Representative Solomon, sponsor).
House Bill 1425 (1995) was substantially reincarnated in 1997 as Senate Bill 555 and its identical companion, House Bill 1104. See id. During hearings before the House Committee on Business and Industry on House Bill 1104, Representative Dukes asked Dr. Bromberg whether a business could convert itself to avoid taxation. See id. (Representative Dukes, member of House Committee on Business Industry). Dr. Bromberg responded: "I don't think it would affect taxation except possibly under the federal income tax. . . . A lot of the switching of entities has been in the past to try to achieve partnership taxation under federal law."See id. (testimony of Dr. Alan Bromberg, representing Texas Business Law Foundation). Curtis Huff also indicated that the conversion process largely would aid corporations that desire to transform themselves into partnerships. See id. (testimony of Curtis Huff, Chair, Corporate Law Committee, Business Law Section, State Bar of Texas).
While the conversion provisions may have been designed in large part to facilitate the transformation of corporations to partnerships, we believe legislators were aware of the provisions' broader implications. The background section of the House Research Organization's Bill Analysis lists nonprofit corporations regulated by the Non-Profit Corporation Act as a form businesses in this state may take. See House Research Org., Bill Analysis at 1, Tex. H.B. 1104, 75th Leg., R.S. (May 5, 1997). (The other four listed forms are corporations, regulated by the Business Corporation Act; limited-liability companies, regulated by the Limited Liability Company Act; limited partnerships, regulated by the Revised Limited Partnership Act; and partnerships and limited liability partnerships, regulated by the Revised Partnership Act. See id.) Later, summarizing supporters' rationale, the bill analysis seems to refer back to this list of organizational forms:
One significant change [this bill proposes] would provide for conversion . . . of different business forms. Texas law recognizes at least seven different forms of business organizations, . . ., each of which carries different benefits and drawbacks. . . . . In a healthy economy, businesses are dynamic, not static, and there should be flexibility to assume new forms. However, the expenses required to dissolve a business in one form and start up in another now limit such conversions.
To solve this problem, HB 1104 would allow a process of conversion.
Id. at 4-5. We infer from this bill analysis that the legislature thought of a nonprofit corporation as an organizational form that an entity may assume and meant to include it within the realm of entities to which a for-profit domestic corporation may convert.
(2) Whether conversion from a for-profit domestic corporation to anonprofit corporation is inconsistent with the Non-Profit CorporationAct
Determining that the conversion provisions, articles 5.17 through 5.20 of the Business Corporation Act, permit a for-profit domestic corporation to convert to a nonprofit corporation is insufficient, however. We must also determine that such a conversion is "not inconsistent" with the Non-Profit Corporation Act, Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 1396-1.01 through -11.01 (Vernon 1997 Supp. 1999). Article 5.17(A)(2)(a) of the Business Corporation Act authorizes a domestic corporation to convert to another organizational form if the conversion is permitted by or not inconsistent with the law of the state in which the converted entity is to be incorporated. As your predecessor stated, the Non-Profit Corporation Act does not expressly recognize conversion to a nonprofit organization.
We conclude, however, that a for-profit domestic corporation's conversion to a nonprofit corporation is not inconsistent with the Non-Profit Corporation Act. We find nothing in the Non-Profit Corporation Act itself that is incompatible with the conversion process. Our chief concern is that the interests of the owners or shareholders be protected, and we are satisfied that the statutes do so. A plan of conversion must be approved by a two-thirds majority of those shareholders entitled to vote on the plan. See Tex. Bus. Corp. Act Ann. art. 5.03(B)(2), (E) (Vernon Supp. 1999); see also id. art. 5.17(A)(1) (requiring corporation to adopt plan of conversion using procedures in article 5.03). All shareholders, whether they are entitled to vote or not, must be notified of the conversion proposal and the meeting at which the vote will be taken. See id. art. 5.03(D); see also id. art. 5.17(A)(1) (requiring converting corporation to adhere to procedures in article 5.03). Moreover, a dissenting shareholder who was entitled to vote may be paid for the fair value of the shareholder's shares. See id. arts. 5.11(A)(2), 5.12(A)(1)(a). These protections are virtually identical to those Pennsylvania grants in its statutes explicitly permitting a for-profit domestic corporation to convert to a non-profit corporation.See 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. §§ 1961, 1962(b), (c).
Your predecessor argued that conversion is inconsistent with the Non-Profit Corporation Act for two reasons. First, because the Non-Profit Corporation Act is silent with respect to conversion while the legislature inserted specific provisions into the Revised Limited Partnership Act, Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art.
First, although the legislature did not amend the Non-Profit Corporation Act specifically to authorize conversion, we cannot read into this fact a legislative desire to preclude a for-profit domestic corporation from converting to a nonprofit corporation. Rather, all we can surmise is that the legislature did not desire to enable a nonprofit corporation to convert to a for-profit domestic corporation. On its face, the Business Corporation Act broadly authorizes a corporation to convert to any "other entity," Tex. Bus. Corp. Act Ann. art. 5.17(A) (Vernon Supp. 1999), which is expressly defined to include nonprofit corporations. See id. art. 1.02(20). Your predecessor appeared to argue, however, that the legislature intended to enable a for-profit corporation to convert to only a limited partnership, a limited liability company, or a partnership. In support of his argument, he observed that the same 1997 bill that amended the Business Corporation Act to permit conversions also amended the Revised Limited Partnership Act; the Limited Liability Company Act; and the Revised Partnership Act to permit conversions — but it did not amend the Non-Profit Corporation Act to permit conversions. See Act of May 13, 1997, 75th Leg., R.S., ch. 375, §§ 79, 95, 122, 1997 Tex. Gen. Laws 1516, 1573-75, 1585-88, 1602-05.
We respectfully disagree with his assessment. The amendments he cited, which parallel the conversion-related amendments to the Business Corporation Act, authorize, among other things, a domestic limited liability company, domestic limited partnership, or a domestic partnership to convert to an "other entity," which is defined in each instance to include a nonprofit corporation. These amendments do not limit a corporation's capacity to convert, under the Business Corporation Act, to a limited liability company, a limited partnership, a partnership, or any other entity.
Second, we do not believe that any overlap of time between the date the converting corporation ceases to exist and the date the converted, nonprofit corporation becomes operational creates a fatal inconsistency between the Business Corporation Act and Texas Revised Civil Statutes article
As your predecessor suggested, this overlap is in contrast with the Revised Limited Partnership Act, the Limited Liability Company Act, and the Revised Partnership Act. Under section 2.01(b) of the Revised Limited Partnership Act, for example, a limited partnership is formed at the time the initial certificate of limited partnership is filed with the Secretary of State "[e]xcept in the case of a limited partnership formed under . . . a plan of conversion." Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art.
While we understand your concern, we do not think it precludes conversion from a for-profit domestic business corporation to a nonprofit corporation organized under Texas Revised Civil Statutes articles
B. Whether a for-profit domestic corporation may convert to a nonprofitwater-supply corporation
In response to your predecessor's second question, we similarly conclude that a for-profit domestic corporation may, under Business Corporation Act article 5.17, convert to a domestic nonprofit water-supply corporation organized under Water Code chapter 67 if the owners of the converting entity approve the plan of conversion consistently with article 5.17(A)(1). As we stated above, article 5.17 explicitly authorizes a for-profit domestic corporation to convert to any "other entity," and the phrase "other entity" is defined to include a nonprofit corporation. Consequently, the Business Corporation Act itself permits the conversion about which he asked.
In addition, we do not believe that conversion from a for-profit domestic corporation is inconsistent with chapter 67 of the Water Code. A water-supply corporation is created in the same manner as is a private corporation, incorporated under the Business Corporation Act. See Tex. Water Code Ann. §
Because we conclude that a for-profit domestic corporation may, under article 5.17 of the Business Corporation Act, convert to a nonprofit domestic corporation or a water-supply corporation, we do not reach your predecessor's third question.
Yours very truly,
JOHN CORNYN Attorney General of Texas
ANDY TAYLOR First Assistant Attorney General
CLARK KENT ERVIN Deputy Attorney General — General Counsel
ELIZABETH ROBINSON Chair, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Kymberly K. Oltrogge Assistant Attorney General