Judges: JOHN L. HILL, Attorney General of Texas
Filed Date: 5/24/1978
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
Honorable Bill Clayton Speaker of the House State Capitol Austin, Texas 78711
Re: Use of funds by state-supported universities.
Dear Speaker Clayton:
You have requested our opinion regarding the use of funds by state-supported universities. You first ask whether interest monies accumulated on constitutionally dedicated funds, appropriated funds, and other revenue defined as ``local funds' may be used at the discretion of the particular university.
Section
the interest accruing thereon shall be subject to appropriation by the Legislature to accomplish the purpose declared in [article 7, section 10].
Section 11a of article 7 provides further that the
interest, dividends and other income accruing from the investments of the Permanent University Fund, except the portion thereof which is appropriated by the operation of Section 18 of Article VII for the payment of principal and interest on bonds or notes issued thereunder, shall be subject to appropriation by the Legislature to accomplish the purposes declared in Section 10 of Article VII of this Constitution.
Section 18, which authorizes the issuance of bonds by the various institutions of the University of Texas and Texas A M University Systems, directs that bonds issued thereunder ``shall be payable solely out of the income from the Permanent University Fund.' Finally, section 17 creates ``a special fund for the purpose of acquiring, constructing and initially equipping buildings or other permanent improvements' at designated institutions of higher learning.
A pro rata portion of the interest from each university's fund under sections 17 and 18 of article 7 is credited to that institution's account in the state treasury, pursuant to article 2543d, V.T.C.S., and is used, first, to retire outstanding bond obligations. Any surplus must be used to finance additional permanent improvements. Thus, interest on these funds is subject to appropriation for the constitutionally specified purposes.
With regard to other funds, section
deposit in the state treasury all cash receipts . . . that may be derived from all sources except auxiliary enterprises, noninstructional services, agency and restricted funds, endowment funds, student loan funds, and Constitutional College Building Amendment funds.
Any interest received on such deposits which is not credited to a constitutional fund under article 2543d is allocated to the General Revenue Fund, ``with the exception of that portion required by other statutes to be credited on a pro rata basis to protested tax payments.' A state university thus has no control over the use of interest accruing on any funds which are deposited in the state treasury, since such interest becomes a part of the General Revenue Fund and subject to legislative appropriation.
As we have noted, section
may be credited to an appropriate account in either general funds or trust funds in relation to the sources of temporary investments in time deposits, if the disposition of the earnings was not specified by the grantor.
See Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 872, at 3094, art. IV, § 2 (appropriating institutional funds for the operation, maintenance and improvement of the respective colleges and universities). Education Code §
You also ask whether state-supported universities are required to engage in standard competitive bidding practices regardless of the funding source of the purchase. Article 664-3, section 5, V.T.C.S., requires that the Board of Control
purchase all supplies, materials, services, and equipment used by each Department of the State Government, including the State Prison System, and each eleemosynary institution, Teachers College, Agricultural and Mechanical College, University of Texas, and each and all other State Schools or Departments of the State Government heretofore or hereafter created . . . .
Certain purchases may be made without Board authority, however, including
[p]urchases of supplies, materials, services and equipment for resale, for auxiliary enterprises, for organized activities relating to instructional departments of institutions of higher learning, and for similar activities of other State Agencies, and purchases made from gifts and grants . . . .
As to this latter group of items, the statute does not require Board of Control approval, and, as a result, an institution is not expressly required to make such purchases on the basis of competitive bidding.
Very truly yours,
John L. Hill Attorney General of Texas
APPROVED:
David M. Kendall First Assistant
C. Robert Heath Chairman Opinion Committee