Judges: DAN MORALES, Attorney General of Texas
Filed Date: 2/25/1993
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
David Smith, M.D. Commissioner Texas Department of Health 1100 West 49th Street Austin, Texas 78756-3199
Re: Whether section
Dear Dr. Smith:
Your predecessor-in-office asked this office to construe section
(a) If an applicant for a license, other than a renewal or branch office license, proposes to operate a home health agency through a partnership, corporation, or other business entity that includes members that are not individuals, or through a corporation the shares of which are owned by another corporation, the applicant must:
(1) establish a corporation under the laws of this state if the applicant is not a corporation organized under the laws of this state.
The legislature codified the statutory predecessor to chapter 142 of the Health and Safety Code, V.T.C.S. article 4447u, in 1989. See Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 678, § 1, at 2370-71. The legislature expressly stated that the codification was nonsubstantive. See Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 678, § 1 (caption to act). The legislature had enacted article 4447u, V.T.C.S., in 1979. See Acts 1979, 66th Leg., ch. 642, at 1466. Article 4447u did not include a provision similar to section
Representative Barton proposed adding section 7A on the floor of the house during the second reading of Senate Bill 1371. See Debate on S.B. 1371 on the Floor of the House, 70th Leg. (May 29, 1987) (statement of Representative Barton) (tape on file with House Committee Coordinator); H.J. of Tex., 70th Leg., at 3899 (1987). Representative Barton stated only that the amendment he proposed would "strengthen licensing procedure." Debate on S.B. 1371 on the Floor of the House, 70th Leg. (May 29, 1987) (statement of Representative Barton) (tape on file with House Committee Coordinator). We were unable to find any additional legislative history indicating the intent of section 142.005's statutory predecessor.
Your predecessor-in-office first asked whether the language in section 142.005(a) regarding a business entity "that includes members that are not individuals" applies only to a nonprofit corporation. Your predecessor stated that the department believes that the quoted language refers only to a nonprofit corporation because a nonprofit corporation is the only type of corporation that has members; a for-profit corporation, on the other hand, has shareholders, not members. We disagree.
Based on our reading of section 142.005, we believe that the legislature intended all non-individual applicants to comply with the additional license application requirements articulated in subsection (a), regardless of the business entity's structure (e.g., limited partnership, general partnership, corporation) or whether the business entity is for-profit or nonprofit. While we agree that "business entity that includes members" describes a nonprofit corporation, see V.T.C.S. art. 1396-1.02(A)(6) (defining "member" as "one having membership rights in a [not-for-profit] corporation in accordance with the provisions of its articles of incorporation or its by-laws"); see also 15 TEX. JUR. 3D Corporations § 502, at 644-45 (1981), we understand that it may describe other business entities as well. For example, we are advised that a limited liability company is a recent hybrid between a corporation and a partnership; the owners of a limited liability company are called members. We understand that the development of the limited liability company postdates the enactment of section 142.005's predecessor; however, in our opinion, the legislature employed broad descriptive language in section 142.005(a) instead of a list of specific types of business entities so that the section would apply to every business entity that desires to operate a home health agency. We conclude, therefore, that "business entity that includes members that are not individuals" in section
Your predecessor-in-office next asked whether the language in section 142.005(a) regarding a "corporation the shares of which are owned by another corporation" refers to a corporation in which another corporation owns any of the shares, or whether it refers to a corporation in which another corporation owns all of the shares. In our opinion, the language of the predecessor statute, V.T.C.S. article 4447u, section 7A, is instructive. Prior to codification in 1989, V.T.C.S. article 4447u, section 7A(a) read in pertinent part as follows: "If an applicant for a license . . . proposes to operate a home health agency . . . through a corporation in which any of the stock is owned by another corporation . . . ." Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 1091, § 5, at 3702 (emphasis added). When a conflict exists between a former statute and a revision the legislature has made pursuant to a proposal for nonsubstantive revisions from the Texas Legislative Council, the former statute will control. See Johnson v. City of Fort Worth,
Finally, your predecessor-in-office asked whether a foreign corporation registered to do business in the State of Texas must establish a domestic corporation to meet the requirements of section
Your predecessor-in-office pointed out that an interpretation of section 142.005(a)(1) that requires a foreign corporation registered to do business in the State of Texas to establish a domestic corporation may contravene article 8.02(A) of the Texas Business Corporation Act. Article 8.02(A) provides that a foreign corporation that has registered in accordance with the Business Corporation Act shall "enjoy the same, but no greater, rights and privileges as a domestic corporation organized for" the same purposes. Because article 8.02 of the Business Corporation Act concerns foreign corporations generally, while section
Very truly yours,
DAN MORALES Attorney General of Texas
WILL PRYOR First Assistant Attorney General
MARY KELLER Deputy Assistant Attorney General
RENEA HICKS Special Assistant Attorney General
MADELEINE B. JOHNSON Chair, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Kymberly K. Oltrogge Assistant Attorney General