Judges: JIM MATTOX, Attorney General of Texas
Filed Date: 2/21/1986
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
Honorable Stephen C. Howard Orange County Attorney Courthouse Orange, Texas 77630
Re: Compliance with section 1A of article 6701h, V.T.C.S., and the dismissal of charges
Dear Mr. Howard:
You have asked about the application of section 1A of article 6701h, V.T.C.S., the safety responsibility law, which provides that no motor vehicle may be operated in this state
unless a policy of automobile liability insurance in at least the minimum amounts to provide evidence of financial responsibility under this Act is in effect to insure against potential losses which may arise out of the operation of that vehicle.
V.T.C.S. art. 6701h, § 1A(a).
The statute further provides:
Sec. 1B. (a) On and after January 1, 1982, every owner and/or operator in the State of Texas shall be required, as a condition of driving, to furnish, upon request, evidence of financial responsibility to a law enforcement officer of the State of Texas or any subdivision thereof, or agent of the Department, or to another person involved in an accident.
(b) The following evidence of financial responsibility satisfies the requirement of Subsection (a) of this section:
(1) a liability insurance policy in the minimum limits required by this Act or a photocopy of that policy;
. . . .
Sec. 1C. Failure to maintain financial responsibility as defined in Section 1(10) of this Act is a Class C misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not less than Seventy-five Dollars ($75). Subsequent offenses shall be Class B misdemeanors, punishable by a fine of not less than Two Hundred Dollars ($200).
Sec. 1D. It is a defense to prosecution under this Act if the person charged produces in court an automobile liability insurance policy or a certificate of self-insurance previously issued to that person that was valid at the time that the offense is alleged to have occurred and the charge shall be dismissed.
V.T.C.S. art. 6701h, §§ 1B, 1C, 1D.
You suggest a fact situation where a motorist arrested for a violation of article 6701h, section 1A, while driving a borrowed car that was not insured by the owner, produced a policy of liability insurance (that was in effect at the time of the alleged violation) covering himself. You ask whether the motorist in such a situation would be entitled to dismissal of the charges under section 1D of the statute, and whether, in order to use the defense, the policy produced must "contain language that he is covered when driving an uninsured vehicle."
In Attorney General Opinion
If the operator, whether or not he owns the vehicle, produces a valid policy that adequately protected the public at the time he operated the vehicle, he is entitled to dismissal of the charge against him under section 1D of article 6701h, V.T.C.S. The policy need not necessarily contain specific language expressly referring to vehicles "not insured by the owner thereof," so long as language in the policy has the legal result of providing statutorily adequate coverage for the operator while operating the vehicle at the time of the alleged violation. Cf. Attorney General Opinion
Very truly yours,
Jim Mattox Attorney General of Texas
Jack Hightower First Assistant Attorney General
Mary Keller Executive Assistant Attorney General
Robert Gray Special Assistant Attorney General
Rick Gilpin Chairman, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Bruce Youngblood Assistant Attorney General