DocketNumber: H-1013
Judges: John Hill
Filed Date: 7/2/1977
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017
Honorable Harvey Davis Opinion No. H-1013 Texas State Soil & Water Conservation Board Re: Deposit of Soil and Temple, Texas 76501 Water Conservation District funds in interest-bearing accounts. Dear Mr. Davis: You have requested our opinion regarding whether a soil and water conservation district may deposit its funds in interest-bearing time accounts or purchase certificates of deposit at banks and savings and loan associations. Section 2 of article 165a-10, V.T.C.S., which deals with the "deposit and withdrawal of funds" of soil and water con- servation districts, provides: The Soil and Conservation Funds . . . appropriated to Conservation Districts shall be deposited in State or National Banks and shall be withdrawn upon ap- proval of the Board of Supervisors of a District by checks or orders signed by the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Supervisors of the District. Although soil and water conservation districts are not sub- ject to most of the general statutes governing depositories, V.T.C.S. arts. 2525-2569, those statutes do provide a basis for defining "deposit" as used in article 165a-10, 9 2. They clearly employ the word "deposit" to mean both time and demand deposits, w, arts. 2525, 2546. In Shaw v. McBre,9 S.W.2d 410
(Tex. Civ. App. -- Texarkana 1928)~ff"``~ -_~ S.W.Zd 121 (Tex. Comm'n App. 1930, jdgmt adopted), the court, construing provisions regulating the banking industry, stated that the meaning of "depositors" in then-articles 475 and 475a, was as broad as "deposit" in then-article 523, defined therein to in- clude both demand and time deposits. Shaw v. McBride, guxa at 411. P. 4183 Honorable Harvey Davis - page 2 (H-1013) Furthermore, the courts of numerous other jurisdictions have held that the meaninq of "deposit" or "depositor" embraces both time and demand deposits. --L&nus Cotton Gin Co. v~.Walker. 70 so. 754, 756 (Ala. 1916): _--- Isenhartv * Monty, 423zEx,- 837-38 (Coio. 1967); Bassett-.v West Haven Bank & Trust.o.,165 A. 895
, 897 (Conn. 1933); Bennett .v.-'American Bax'& Trust co.,134 S.E. 781
, 786 (Ga. 19m- ---McCormicZ.~ins~122- -_- N.E. 151, 154 (Ill. 19191: State ex rel.~ Carroll v. Corning State Savings Bank, 113 N;WT-500, 502(Iowa 1907); State ex rel. Davis v.201 N.W. 901
904 (Neb. 1924) ; Jones v. O'Bri````-~F~F"6``;;59 (S. Dak. 1431). On the basis of these aluthorities. it is our-opinion that the command of sec- tion 2 of article 165a-10, that funds of soil and water conser- vation districts be "deposited" in state or national banks, would permit the deposit of such funds in interest-bearing time accounts. A "certificate of deposit," however, ordinarily signifies a deposit payable at some future date. In effect, it repre- sents the issuing bank's promissory note to the depositor. Thompson v. Thompson,236 S.W.2d 779
(Tex. 1951). A certificate of deposit is denominated an "investment" by article 6252-5a, V.T.C.S. See -. _ First~National Bank in Grand Prairie v. Lone Star Life Insurance Co.,524 S.W.2d 525
(Tex. CiviTpp. --mGr' writ ref'd n.r.e.,529 S.W.2d 67
(Tex. 1975). We believe, there- fore,that article 165a-10 does not authorize soil and water con- servation districts to purchase certificates of deposit. Neither article 165a-10 nor any other statute, permits the deposit of district funds in savings and loan associa- tions. In Attorney General Opinion H-723 (19751, we held that section 6.14 of article 852a, V.T.C.S., does not in it- self affirmatively authorize any political subdivision to place,its funds in a savings and loan association unless that political subdivis.ion is authorized to do so by other law. Since we are aware of no other law with regard to soil and water conservation districts, it is our opinion that such a district is not at present authorized to deposit its funds in a savings and loan association. SUMMARY --, ---- A soil and water conservation district may deposit its funds in interest-bearing time accounts in a state or national bank, but it may not purchase certificates of deposit, nor may it deposit its funds in a savings and loan association. p. 4184 Honorable Harvey Davis - page 3 (H-1013) Very truly yours, Attorney General of Texas AWROVED: Opinion Committee klw p. 4185
Thompson v. Thompson , 149 Tex. 632 ( 1951 )
Bassett v. West Haven Bank & Trust Co. , 116 Conn. 609 ( 1933 )
1st Nat. Bk. of Gr. Prairie v. LONE STAR L. INS. CO. , 529 S.W.2d 67 ( 1975 )
Shaw v. McBride , 9 S.W.2d 410 ( 1928 )
First National Bank in Grand Prairie v. Lone Star Life ... , 1975 Tex. App. LEXIS 2459 ( 1975 )