DocketNumber: WW-1115
Judges: Will Wilson
Filed Date: 7/2/1961
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017
AhUSIIN 11. -rExaS FVIIAL WIISO~ A-RNEY GENER*L August 22, 1961 Honorable Stanley C. Kirk Opinion No. WW-1115 District Attorney Wichita County Courthouse Re: Whether ,a grand jury may Wichita Falls, Texas interrogate an accused witness without the witness' Dear Mr. Kirk: counsel being present? You have asked this office for an opinion on the follow- ing: JMay a grand jury interrogate an accused witness without the witness' counsel being present?" There is no Texas authority on this particularquestion. However, all other jurisdictions which have ruled on this point hold that such a witness does not have a right to have his attorney with him in the grand jury room. In re Black, 47 F.,2d tl$ZD(;.C.A.2d 1931), United States Y. Priest, '77F.Supp. 812 o., 1948) United States v. Central Supply Association, ``'::``~; 241 iN.D.Ohio, 1940) Peovle V. Dale,179 P.2d 870
1947) Wickline v.'Alvis144 N.E.2d 207
(C.A.Ohio, 19;7),*Unitid Stat& v. Levine. 127 FISuoo. 651 (D.Mass., 1955), United States v. Blanl;on, 77 F:Sup& gl2*tB.D;tio;;-@& . The witness Inust rely for any needed protection on his personal privilege against self-incrimination to be invoked when the occasion arises. In Texas, the established rule that a person shall not be compelled to give~evidence against himself in a criminal prosecution may be invoked by a witness called to testify before a grand jury unless he has been guaranteed com- plete immunity from prosecution in giving such testimony or unless he has waived his privilege by appearing voluntarily or by consenting to be interrogated. Fx carte Smelley,21 S.W.2d 299
(Tex.Crim.,~1929), Browning v. StE;e6r;i2.S.W. 1 (T;;;z;m., 1911), Shaw v. State,165 S.W. 930
(T 1914). the witness will be held to have waived'his &vilege, however, it must be shown that he was duly cautioned as to his rights. Allen v. State, 188 S.Wb 979 (Tex.Crim., 1916), Simmons v. State,184 S.W. 226
(Tex.Crim., 1916). Honorable Stanley C. Kirk, Page 2 (WW-1115) The reason and theory behind the holding by the courts of various jurisdictions is that the grand jury is a secret proceeding which meets, receives and sifts evidence inde- pendently, secretly, and in their own way so as not to be in- fluenced or swayed by passions or improper motives. The accused witness certainly has no right to appear before the grand jury either personally or by counsel. In United State v.Levine, supra
, the court said: "Defendant's right to the assistance of counsel accrues with the returning of the indictments against him. He is not entitled to counsel at the grand jury stage of the pro- ceedings." As stated in Wickline v.Alvis, supra
: "Proceedings of the grand jury are not a trial but are more in the nat.ureof an inquest. There are no parties, and no defendant has a right to appear before the grand jury . . . and :~:;a no right to take his attorney along with In People v.Dale, supra
, it was held that: "It is clear that one who is being investi- gated by a grand jury is not entitled to be represented by counsel before that body." The State Grand Jury Hand Book prepared by the American Bar Association was printed in its final form only after ,a copy of it had been "placed in the hands of every State judge through- out the United States." (Preface) The Hand Book states: "Finally, bear in mind that neither a defendant nor an ordinary witness, when appearing before a Grand Jury, is entitled to have his counsel present in the Grand Jury Room. To do so would be unlawful." To answer your inquiry, a grand jury may interrogate an accused witness without the witness' counsel being present. This agrees with your view of the law on this subject. Honorable Stanley C. Kirk, Page 3, (WW-1115) SUMMARY A grand jury may interrogate an accused witness without the witness' counsel being present. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas Glenn R. Brown Assistant Attorney General GRB:ca APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Ben Harrison Leon Pesek Ralph Rash John Reeves REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Houghton Brownlee, Jr.