DocketNumber: WW-1015
Judges: Will Wilson
Filed Date: 7/2/1961
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017
THEATTORNEY GENERAL March 13, 1961 Honorable Fred P. Holub Opinion No. WW-1015 County Attorney Matagorda County Re: Whether persons who were Bay City, Texas over 60 years of age on January 1, 1960, and reside In Bay City are required to possess an exemption certificate, by virtue of the fact that the 1960 Federal census shows that Bay City is now a city of 10,000 in- habitants or more. Dear Mr. Holub: You have stated In your opinion request that, according to the 1960Federal census, Bay City has a population of more than 10,000, which Is the first time in Its history that it has reached 10,000 inhabitants. You have asked for an opinion on whether residents of Bay City who are exempt from payment of the 1960poll tax because of overa e (I.e., persons who had reached 60 years of age on January 1, 1980) must have obtained an exemption certificate in order to be qualified to vote during the current year. Exemption certificate requirements for overage voters are governed by Article 5.16 of V.C.S., Election Code, which provides: "Every person who is exempted by law from the payment of a poll tax, and who Is In other respects a qualified voter, who resides In a city of ten thousand (10,000) Inhabitants or more, shall, before the first day of February of the year when such voter shall have become entitled to such exemption, obtain from the Tax Collector of the county of his or her resi- dence, a certificate showing his or her exemption from the payment of a poll tax. Such certificate shall entitle such voter to vote at any election held between the date of its issuance and a period of one (1) year from the 31st day of January following its issuance. If* * * Honorable Fred P. Holub, page 2 (WW-1015) "Although entitled to an exemption certif- Ic.ate, no one shall vote who does not possess a current exemption certlficate.V You have informed us'that the Tax Collector of Matagorda County was prepared to issue exemption certificates to applicants during the entire period for obtaining the certificates and that a large number were issued. However, since it has not heretofore been necessary for overage residents of Bay City to obtain exemption certificates, you anticipate that some have neglected to procure certificates and that you will be faced with the question of their eligibility to vote during the current year. The 1960 Federal census became effective for Bay City on the date of the first official preliminary announcement of the census result for that city. Holcomb v. Spikes,232 S.W. 891
(Civ. App. 1921, error dism.); Att'y Gen. Ops. V-1137 (1950), WW-972 (1960). In August of 1960, the Bureau of the Census published a preliminary report of the population of incorporated places in Texas of 1,000 inhabitants or more (Report No. PC (Pl)-45), which showed Bay City as having a population of 11,580. We are not in- formed whether this was the first official announcement, but in any event the 1960 census was in effect for Bay City on October 1, 1960, the date on which the period for issuance of the certificates commenced (see Article 5.18, Election Code). Liability for, and exemption from, payment of the 1960 poll tax was determined as of January 1, 1960, on which date Bay City had a population of less than 10,000 according to the 1950 census then In effect, but we are of the opinion that necessity for obtaining exemption certificates required by Article 5.16 does not depend on the population as of that date. The purpose for which exemption certificates are required is to provide a means for protecting the purity of elections. Texas Power & Light Co. v. Brownwood Public Service Co.,111 S.W.2d 1225
(Civ.App. 1937, error ref.); Thomas v. Groebl208 S.W.2d 412
(Civ.App. 1948 , reversed on other grounds, 14: Tex. 70,212 S.W.2d 625
(1948j. This purpose has no relevancy to population as of the date deter- mining exempt status; It is relevant to population at the time of voting. Article 5.16 states that a person 'who resides" In a city of 10,000 inhabitants or more shall obtain a certificate. Both from the language and the purpose of Article 5.16, population during the time for issuance and use of the certificates is con- trolling. A resident otherwise qualified may vote without a cer- tificate in elections held during the year in which a city attains the 10,000 population mark, for the Legislature has not provided a means whereby he might obtain a certificate for use during that year; but he must obtain a certificate in order to vote during the subsequent year. Bay City was officially a city of more than 10,000 itsi habitants during the period for Issuance of exemption certificates Honorable Fred P. Holub, page 3 (WW-1015) and will continue in that classification during the current voting year. We are of the opinion that overage residents must have ob- tained exemption certificates in order to be qualified to vote during the current year. In view of the fact that the Tax Collector of Matagorda County had construed the law as requiring procurement of exemption certificates and was prepared to issue them, it is not necessary to consider what effect a failure of the Tax Collector to construe the law in this manner or to be prepared to Issue the certificates might have had on eligibility to vote without a certificate. And since the 1960 census had taken effect in Bay City prior to the beginning of the period for issuance, it is also unnecessary to consider whether the holding of this opinion would have been altered in any respect if the effective date had been subsequent to the beginning of the period for issuance. SUMMARY Persons exempt from payment of the 1960 poll tax by reason of overage, residing in Bay City, which now has attained a population of more than 10,000, must have obtained an exemption certificate prior to February 1, 1961, In order to be qualified to vote during 1961. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas ,a&&&= Mary $E Wall Assistant MKW:ljb APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Elmer McVey Riley Eugene Fletcher Houghton Brownlee REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: Morgan Nesbltt