DocketNumber: V-307
Judges: Price Daniel
Filed Date: 7/2/1947
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017
641 July 16, 1947 Hon. Jesse James, Opinion .- No.,V-307 State Treasurer; Austin, Texas Re: Construction of Ar- title 1524-a, V.C.Q. ,. with respect to 1 transfers of secur- ities and releases thereof, deposited with the State Treasurer. Dear Sir: Your letter of request for an opinion upon the above titled subject matter is as follows: “In compliance with the provisions of Ar- ticle 1524-a, one of the investment OOD- panies has been depositing with this De-’ partment certain real estate notes. When these notes are deposited, Transfers of Lien are furnished this office, said.trans- fers having first been filed.in the county clerk's office of the county in which the property is located. A blank form of such transfer is enclosed herewith. When the notes are withdrawn from this of- fice, we execute another Transfer of Lien, transferring ownership back to the company. This .transferalso is enclosed. "The question has now arisen as to whether we are using the correct language in such transfers, as the ones now being used pur- port to transfer ownership by actual sale, when as a matter of fact, the ownership is transferred only in trust. "To clarify this situation, we kindly request your opinion of the following questions: . Hon. Jesss James - Page~2 (V-307) “1. Are the forms furnished herewith cor- rect, or, should the purported cash don- sid+ration be left out and the words Iin trust’ be added? If you have further sugqestions to make on what the correct forms should be, we will appreciate your views. “2. If the enclosed forms we not cor- rect, should the transfers of lien now in force on the notes now deposited be a- mended so as to correct the error? “3. Should the State Department of Elank- 1% approve, in writing, each Transfer of Lien, before it is aocepted by this office?* For convenience we shall answer your questions in the Order in which they are stated. \ 1. The form of transfer of the deposits con- templatea under Artiole 1524-a of Vernon’s Civil Statutea which acoompanies your letter Is that of an absolute oon- veyance to the Treasurer. It makes no reference to the statute nor does it specify that the conveyance 1s in tzu& of any charaoter. We think, however, the form is sufficient for the statutory purposes mentioned. A deed, absolute In form, ;z; ;“, shown to be a conveyance in trust or mortgage. Oar- Carter,5 Tex. 93
; Young v. Fit%s, 183 S.W. (2d) 186; Lionard vs. Smith, 186 S. W. (28) 284. It would. not be amiss, however, to add to t&e granting clause the words “such conve nce being in statu- tory trust”, although this is not ind r spensable. Your form of the conveyance by the Treasurer to the depositor is an absolute sale upon a nominal oonsid- iration. We think this form is sufficient for the same reasons we have statea above in support of the transfer to the Treasurer. 2. Since we have held the forms to be suffi- cient , it is unnecessary to answer your question No. 2. 3. The State Treasurer should not aocept any deposits under Article 1524-a - whether as an original or replacement deposit - without certifioate of appr,oval by Hon. Jesse5 Tex. 93 ; Young vs. Fitts, 183 S.tV. (2d) 186; Leonard VS. Smith, 186 S. W. (2d) 284. 2. The Treasurer should not accept any such deposits, unless they are accompanied by the certificate of the Banking Commissioner as to eligibility and sufficiency for the purpose of deposit. Yours very truly, ATTORNEY CENERAL OF TEXAS BY 0S:wb !ilikke Assistant Encl. APPROVED: ATTORNEY GENERAL