DocketNumber: JM-554
Judges: Jim Mattox
Filed Date: 7/2/1986
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017
Sam A. Nixon, M.D. Opinion No. JM-554 Chairman State Rural Medical Education Re: Whether a physician whose Board student loan is repaid by s&vice Southwest Tower Building in a rural county is liable for 211 East Seventh Street federal income taxes on the Austin, Texas 78701 amount of the loan discharged Dear Dr. Nixon: You have requested wr opinion regarding the application of section 108(f) of the fedetal Internal Revenue Code, as amended by the Tax Reform Act of 1984, to the forgiveness of indebtednesses under section 7 of article 4498c, V.T.C.S. This opinion is limited to the questions asked. The Texas statute, a::ticle 4498c. establishes the State Rural Medical Education Board. ;ections 6 and 7 of the statute provide in pertinent part: Sec. 6. It shall be the duty of the Board to receive and pass upon, allow or disallow all applications for loans, grants or scholarships made by students who are bona fide citizens and residents of the State of Texas and who have a desire to become physicians, and who are accept- able for enrollment in a qualified medical school. The purpose of mch loans, grants or scholarships shall be to en&>:le such applicants to obtain a standard medical education which will qualify them to become licer.sed, practicing physicians and surgeons within t&e State of Texas. . . . The said Boari. shall have authority to grant to each applicant ds:emed by the Board to be qualified to receive the s,nne, a loan, grant or scholarship for the purpose of acquiring a medical education as herein providf:d for, upon such terms and condi- tions to be imposed by the Board as provided for in this Act. The Board shall, except in those cases which it dtzems proper, make every effort to p. 2458 Dr. Sam A. Nixon - Page 2 (JM-554) grant loans to applicants rather than grants or scholarships. Before -- awarding funds, the Board may review candidates for loans, grants or scholar- ships to determf;le their intent concerning the location of fututg practice. Sec. 7. Applkants who are granted loans, grants or schola:rrrhips by the Board shall receive an amount which may defray his or her tuition and other expenses in any reputable, accepted and accredited medica:L school or medical college or school . . . or II scholarship to any such medical college or schocl for a term not exceeding four (4) years, same to be paid at such time and in such manner as ‘nay be determined by the Board. The loans, grants and scholarships herein provided may be proportioned in any such manner as to pay to the medical school to which any applicant is admitted such funds as are required by that school. and the balance to be paid directly to the applicant; all -- o:i which shall be under such terms and conditions as may be provided under rules and regulations of tkz: Board. The said loans, grants, or scholarships &all be based upon the condition that the full amount thereof shall be repaid to the State of Texas in cash in full with ten (10) percent interest from the date of each payment by the State on such loan, grant or scholarship or by satisfaction of other conditions of the Board or this Act. If the applicant -- practices his profes- sion in a rural area as defined by this Act the Board is author:&ed and shall credit one-fifth of the loan, gr& or scholarship together with interest thereon70 the applicant for each year of such practice as-certified by the Board. At the end of the seconcrfull year of practice in a rural area as provided-for herein, the applicant shall be privileged topay off the balance of the loan, grant or scholar.ship as the case may be with accrued interest thereon, and upon such payment shall be relieved from further obligation under his contract. S’wuld the applicant default under his contract at any time the full principal and accrued interest plus a penalty of 100 percent of the outstanding balance plus attorney’s fees as defined by said contract shall be due and owing to the State. (Emphasis added). p. 2459 Dr. Sam A. Nixon - Page 3 (JM-554) . P Section 108(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of the United States, as amended in 1984, reads in pertinent part: (f) Student loans.-- (1) In general.--In the case of an individual, gross income doc:s not include any amount which (but for this sub:section) would be includible in gross income by :reason of the discharge (in whole or in part) of any student loan if such discharge was pursuant to a provision of such loan under which all or ptrrt of the indebtedness of the individual would be discharged if the individual worked for a ce:rtain period of time in certain professions for a:y of a broad class of employers. (2) Student :.oan. --For purposes of this sub- section, the tern 'student loan' means any loan to an individual to assist the individual in atten- ding an educational organization described in section 170(b)(l)(A)(ii) made by-- . . . . (B) a S1:ate. territory, or possession of the United St&es, or the District of Columbia, or any political subdivision thereof, or. . . . (Emphasis added). 26 U.S.C. 5108(f). The "educational orgar.izations" to which subsection (f)(2) of the federal statute refers mears an educational organization which normally main- tains a regular faculty and curriculum and normally has a regularly enrolled body of pupils or students in attendance at the place where its educational activities are regularly carried on. 26 U.S.C. ~170(b)(l)(A)(ii). You ask: 1. Are our doctors excluded from paying taxes on their loans because of the provision [con- cerning] a broad class of employers? p. 2460 Dr. Sam A. Nixon - Page 4 (JM-554) 2. If our doctors must pay taxes on their loans, is interest to be considered a part of the financial obligation? 3. If the Tax Reform Act is applicable, is it required that dactors pay taxes on their loans when the loans were given before the Tax Reform Act of 1984 was passed? 4. If the Tax Reform Act is applicable, is it incumbent upon tie Board to explain this to the loan recipient and, if necessary, provide him with the appropriate tax forms to declare such income? In our opinion, the credits allowed by the State Rural Medical Education Board pursuant to section 7 of article 4498c, do not constitute taxable income under the federal Internal Revenue Code as amended in 1984. The language of section 108(f) thereof plainly excludes from gross income amounts discharged pursuant to a provision of a loan allowing a discharge if the student debtor "worked (1) for a certarperiod of time (2) in certain professions (3) for any of a broad class of employers." The condition need not be set out in the statute; it is sufficient that it be "pursuant to a provision of such loan." Sections 6 and 7 of article 4498c. V.T.C.S., empower the board to establish the rules, regul&tions, and terms upon which loans will be made. Thus, the board could so condition loans as to meet section 108(f) criteria if the larguage of article 4498c did not already do so. But we think the language of article 4498c, which is to be read into every such loan instrument, see 53 Tex. Jur. 2d Statutes 625, at 45 (1964). is sufficient in self to satisfy section 108(f) requirements. The federal law does not define the "certain period of time," the "certain professions," or the "broad class of employers" of which it speaks. Article 4498c. section 6, authorizes loans to residents of the state for the purpose of obtaining a medical education that will qualify them to become licensed, practicing physicians and surgeons "within the State of Texas," and section 7 authorizes credit upon repayment of the loan only for "each year" [satisfying the "certain period of time" requirement] the graduate practices his medical "profession" [satisfying the "certain profession" requirement] in a rural area of Texas [sat,isfying the "broad class of employers" requirement]. See V.T.C.S. art. 4498c. 020. Physicians and surgeons practicing in Gl areas .ze commonly employed by residents of Texas [the broad class of employc:rs] to serve their medical needs. p. 2461 Dr. Sam A. Nixon - Page 5 (JM-554) In answer to your firr,t question we advise that, in our opinion, physician and surgeon beneficiaries of the article 4498~ student loan program may exempt from their gross income -- pursuant to section 108(f) of the federal Internal Revenue Code as revised in 1984 -- any loan amount discharged pursuant to authorized provisions of an article 4498c loan. Such an authorized provision will require the graduate, in order to receive the credit, to engage in the practice of his profession for one or more years in a rural area serving the medical needs of residents of Texas employing him for that purpose. Your other questions '#ere predicated upon a different answer to the first question. We do not reach them. SUMMARY Physician and surgeon beneficiaries of article 4498~. V.T.C.S., student loans may exempt from their gross income under the federal Internal Revenue Code as amended in 1984 any loan amount discharged pursuant to an authorized loan provision. J Very truly yours A;, J I M MATTOX Attorney General of Texas JACK HIGHTOWER First Assistant Attorney General MARY KELLER Executive Assistant Attorney General RICK GILPIN Chairman, Opinion Committee Prepared by Bruce Youngblood Assistant Attorney General p. 2462