DocketNumber: JM-412
Judges: Jim Mattox
Filed Date: 7/2/1985
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017
The Attorney General of Texas IIM MATlOX December 31, 1985 ittomry General Ilonorablc Benjamin Curesti, Jr. opinion lo. m-412 Cameron County Attorney 9lb E. Barrieon Street * RC: V h e tb er l "camin nite' Bromsv~lle, texaa 78520 rpooaored by l school dletrlct would violate tbc Penal Code prohibItlone against gambling 714 Ju~sO% Suila 700 Daar Mr. Eurceti: Dnllu. TX 7929249m 2lu742d944 Tov ask vbat’hsr a ‘camho ulte” epooeorad by a school dletrlet vould violate the Taxer Panel Code prohibitioae l~a inet gambling. The “ceelno nita" d+e,::ribed in your letter vi11 be pert of l sradrution function in vhlch aacb studant vfll be given a met 6mount of play money to uee at qxrlourtablae vharc cards or other games of chance are to be played. At l preset time, the gamer vill cloea and the play 1001 Trrnh SUN* IQ) money vi11 be ueal l itbar to bid In an auction for donated prizer or 140urlon. TX. 77002.3111 to eater lotteries for donated prize*. lo charge vlll be made to any 7132239d99 student, aa an rdmirrlon fee or othervine, for taklag part in the “casino nite.' W5 8robdwny. Suit* 312 Baeed .011 these factr, you lnk saver&l qucctione 6bout rpecific Luoeock, m 794015179 9ou747.9239 prwlefoor of tbe feue Penal Code regardins gerbllog. All of your queetione, bovevm, relate either to the elawnte of or to the defanrce to the cr:Y~minaloffmne of gambling. Tba offenee of gambling 4wa w. tmtn. sdt* s ie met fortb in lo c tio11.02 n of tbe Paoal Cede: McAlhn, Ix 78901.1999 91-7 (a) A person comite an offense if be: 200M6lrl ?lu8.8ullrroe ('1:) ukee bet oo the perthl a or final kn *ntodo, TX 792052797. reexAt of a ga8e or contact or on the parfor- 91aa94191 maam of a participant in a gama or eontert; An Equal ooporluniw W ulcer a bet on tbe remit of any Ammalk6 Acllon Employu pol*t:Lul oomiaatioo, 6ppointment. or election or :m tbe degree of lu c c eee of en9 nominee, lppobmtaa. or candidate;- or (3’) plate and beta for umey or other thin& of --- value at any game plqed w%tb urde, dice, OT b6:Lle. (Emph6eie addid). p. 1884 ______---_ ---, c-- __----_, --_ --.- _ ,-.. ---, ’ , The tam 5et.” em used in this section, is daflned la rection 47.01 aa follove: (1) ‘Bet’ wane an agreement thet, dependent a8 cbenee even though lccompanlad by non6 rkill, one stands to vh or lore l omatblng of value. . . . [Followed by lxctptione not applicable here]. The lagal la a nlng of %ot” involvae not 0019 the ultimata vhnlng of something value but of the initial giving or agreement to give something of value. See Odle v. State, 139 S.Y.2d 595, 591 (Tax. Grim. App. ,19hO, no vrix’rav’d on other grouud6. 578 S.Y.Zd 411, 413 n. 1 (Tu. Grim. App. 19795; Cllie v. Stete, 189 S.U. 1076, 1075 (Tax. Grim. App. 1916, no uric:). Pour, in Texan, three basic element6 cumprire the offenra of grmbliag: COn6id6T6tims chance. and prize. the “cenino nita” fomat that you deecrlba in your request In letter, no charge vi11 btr made to any student for taking part %n the “ceelno uite.’ In Monte Carlo Parties, Ltd. v. Webb,322 S.E.2d 246
, 248 (Ga. 1984). thee?8 Suprme Court construed a Georgia gambling statute that is similar to tbe Texan ntatute and concluded that 6 “Cenino Right” format lo which no guest is required to pert vlth any- thing of value to partic~peta in gamer l&eke the conrideratioa element of tbe offenre of gambling. A Texas court applied l imilar reasoning dth regard to a “lottery,” a nubcategory of gambling Offeo6eS under section 67.03(s) of tha! T6X68 Penal Code, 6nd concluded that an offense occurred, in prwt, becaura the players verc required to purch6ee bingo cards in ‘order to p6rtleiprte. See State v. Awets Poet Number SO, 541 S.W.:!il 481, C82 (Tax. Civ. Apr- Dblh6 1976, oo vrit) . Consequently , $16 believe tbat the lreential element of cweideretion in the offense of gambling is tinning from the “carino nite” format tbat you dewribe. A "ca&lno n!.te” fotwat in vblcb DO parson giver or promieee to Sire anything of yalue in order to earticioate lmke tbe llemeet of consideration ibat is’ leeent:``l to the offmea of g6abliag under eectiw 47.02 of tba Taxer Penal Code. Attorney General of Texas _- p. 1gM JACK IICBTWER liret Aeeietent Attorney C~!r~eral ItAm rntn Executive Aeeietent Attornq General ROBERTGRAY Special Aeeietant Attorney General RICK GILPIN Cluiman, Opinion Camnittar Prepared by Jennifer Riggs Aeeietant Attorney General p. 1666