DocketNumber: H-387
Judges: John Hill
Filed Date: 7/2/1974
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017
._ -- .``~ -... ,- ..,... ,... .~ ._.,. .__... Augu,st 29, 1974 Mrs. Jan Ash, Executive Secretary, Opinion No. H- 387 Texas State Board of Landscape Architects ’ 320 Sam Houston State. Office Building’ Re: C,ompensation of Austin, Texas ,78701, members of Board of Landscape Architects under Dear Mrs. Ash: Art. 249c, V. T. C.S. Your request for our op$-+ion stems from an apparent conflict between Art. 249~. Sec. 4(b), V. T. C.S., and an appropriation to your Board in the Appropriations Act for ,f+scal year 1974-1975 (Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., ch. 659, p. 1786). ;, Article 24.9~. Sec. ,3,, cr,eate&be Texas State Board of Lasdscape Architects. Section 4 prescribes the powers and duties of the Board and, in subsect,ion (b), provides: Each member of the board shall receive as compensation for services performed~in connec- ti,on withhis duties as such member a sum equal to hi.s expenses actually incurred, provided how- ever, said expenses shall not exceed thi sum of $25 per day, exclusive of travel expense. The Appropriations Act, under the heading “Per Diem of Board Members. 3 at $25,” allocates $1,800 to your board., Apparently, you bave interpreted this as a per diem all.ocation to be paid regardless of actual expenses. However, the Comptroller has refused to pay on that basis. “Per diem” does not have a fixed meaning, and, among other things, it may be used to refer to a fixed amount allowed to compensate for expenses actually incurred. Attorney General Opinions H-307 (1974) and ‘H-74 (1973). If there is conflict, the provisions of the Appropriations Act may not overrule general legislation. Attorney General Opinions H-351 (1974), V-1254 (1951). See also Moore v. Sheppard,192 S. W. 2d 559
(Tex. 1946). p. 1818 Mrs. Jan Ash, page 2 (H-387) We are of the opinion, therefore, that the amount of per diem to be recovered by members of your Board is governed by Art. 249c, Sec. 4(b), and is limited to actual expenses incurred, brovided such expenses do not exceed $25. SUMMARY Where a statute creating an admin:istrative board authorizes reimbursement of board members for actual expenses but not to exceed $25 per day, a general approp- riation of $25 per diem to them does not authoriae the payment of the greater sum. Very truly yours, u Attorney General of Texas . Opinion Comrmttee. p. 1819