DocketNumber: C-113
Judges: Waggoner Carr
Filed Date: 7/2/1963
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017
July 29, 1963 Dr. M. H. Crabb Opinion No. C- 113 Secretarv. Texas State Board Medical Examiners Re: Validity of Article II, Medical Arts Building Section 2ab of House Bill Fort Worth 2, Texas 76102 86, Acts of the 58th Leg., R.S., 1963. Dear Doctor Crabb: We are in receipt of your opinion request regarding the constitutionality or validity of a portion of the appro- priation bill of the 58th Legislature which may affect the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners. The section cited above appears as a rider to the appropriation act and is worded as fol- lows: "b. None of the moneys appropriated to the Hospital Board or to Institutions under its jur- isdiction by this Article may be expended for salaries of persons assigned to positions entitled 'Medical Technician' as shown in this Article, un- less such persons are licensed to practice medixne by other States or Nations but have not yet been licensed as physicians under the law of this State. This provision shall t be construed to pro- hibit salary payments?0 qualified phy%?ks re- crulted from other states who are eligible for license In Texas, and,notwlthstanding the require- ments of the State Board of Medical Examiners, such physicians shall be given a reasonable time to be determined by the Hospital Board to secure a Texas 'licenseto practice medicine." (Emphasis added). Section 35 of Article III of the Constitution of Texas states as follows: -559- Dr. M. H. Crabb, page 2 (c-113 ) “Sec. 35. No bill, (except general appropria- tion bills, which may embrace the various subjects and accounts for and on account of which moneys are appropriated) shall contain more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title. But if any subject shall be embraced in an act, which shall not be expressed In the title, such act shall be void only as to so much thereof, as shall not be so ex- pressed." If Section 28b of Article II of the appropriation bill merely limits in some way the distribution of state money for certain purposes and under certain enumerated conditions which are incidental to the appropriation, then the rider is valid. If the rider contains language which amounts to general legislation, or conflicts with or modifies existing general legislation then the rider must be declared Invalid. Moore v. Sheppard,144 Tex. 537
, 192 S.W.M 559 (19’+6). The rider in question contemplates that a physician will be employed as a "Medical Technician"; therefore we are not required to ascertain whether or not he will perform any of those acts enumer- ated in Article 4510 as the practice of medicine. Article 4500 of Vernon's Civil Statutes states In part as follows: "The Texas State Board of Medical Examiners may, in its discretion, upon payment b an appli- cant of a fee of One Hundred Dollars ($ 100) grant a license to practice medicine to any.reputable physician who is a citizen of the United States .and to llcentlates of other State or Terri- to&es having requirements for medical registra- tion and practice equal,to those established by the laws of this State. . . ." (Emphasis added). Article 4500 has long been construed to mean that the Hoard of Medical Examiners must use Its own "discretion" In de- ciding whether to grant a license to practice in Texas to licen- tlates of other states. Attorney General's Opinion No. 0-1556 (1939). ~The rider to the appropriation act does not afford the Hoard the discretion previously given it by Article 4500. Under the provisions of the rider the medical technician cannot be paid unless he does not have a license to practice in Texas. The rider then proceeds t=hange the existing requirements of Article 4498 (whereby each practitioner must have a certificate issued by the Hoard), and allows the Hospital Hoard to, in effect, suspend the -560- _. . . Dr. M. H. Crabb, page 3 (C- 113 ) terms of Article 4498 for. "a reasonable time to be determined by the Hospital Board." The said Article 4498 states in part as follows: "It shall be unlawful for any one to practice medicine, in any of its branches, upon human beings within the limits of this State who has not registered in the District Clerk's office of every County in which he may reside, and In each and every County in which he may maintain an office or may designate a place for meeting, advising with, treating in any manner, or prescribing for patients, the certificate evidencing his right to practice medicine, as issued to him by the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, . . . (Emphasis added). We therefore advise you that Section 28b of Article II of House Bill 86 of the 58th Legislature is unconstitutional. It attempts to abrogate or amend the general law requiring physicians who practice medicine In Texas to obtain a certificate from the' Texas State Board of Medical Examiners pursuant to Article 4498. The caption to House Bill 86 is as follows: "AN ACT appropriating money for the support of the Judicial, Executive, and Legislative branches of the State Government, for the construction of State buildings, the payment of claims against the State, and for State aid to public junior colleges, for the two-year period beginning September 1, 1963, and ending August 31, 1965; authorizing and pre- scribing conditions, limitations, rules and proced- ures for allocating and expending the appropriated funds; and declaring an emergency." Neither the title of Section 28 (Compensation Rules), nor the caption of the bill would put anyone on notice that an exception was being made to the requirements for the practice of medicine in Texas. Attorney Gen- eral's Opinions Nos. : v-1263 (1951); WW-253 (1957); WW-1152 SUMMARY Section 28b of Article II of House Bill 86 of the 58th Legislature Is Invalid to the extent that it attempts to alter or amend the general law regard- ing the practice of medicine by way of a rider to the appropriation bill. -561- 1 .- Dr. M. H. Crabb, page 4 (C- 113) Yours very truly, ````~ Fred D. Ward Assistant FDW:wb:mkh APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman John Reeves W. 0. Shultz Wayne Rodgers Paul Phy APPROVEDFOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Stanton Stone -562-