OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN ‘IO hsrr Joilr opinion rqlo8t 1943, whloh naar a8 r0u0mt that the pass or gear readr for IIS@ muld or do*r it makr d Aot ml&O8 it laurul AImtin, and *area8 law8 in eonflirt, Uaroh and Aprill. Although uw havo pabliol oxpnroo~ our opinion that thla notlon or H ouao MU lW8 lr not in oollflirt with HORW Bill 38, IlonmnDlo ~1111~ t. Twkr - he. 8 4 8th k lla turand o,that, tlktoiolr, lt 1s unlwtu P 4uln8 uoathr of hbrur7, tin Ytuoh 11 to take blrok ?~a##,whlto bmr or from said lakoi or to flsh for 8-0 r*1t101al lmror, we sbal lp p r r o l~to t0ur 84riu 18 roforuo* to tht a qrrstlon, a86 auure yeu thet as soon ss rwh ldvlulr uulw4 thrt wo sbsll lblUo by 8 doe!rlonr ~00 say han rsaobod la rrfonqocr "I Q this ?I*ttbr.* It a@t bo ssrortcd rlth SW. iorer th8t A. Dr lOBb, Se u SU~OII, 45th &$islatufe deals 81th spsolrir an6 put Paalu ash, ~hcrus R. 1. 86, d**uhr 9ession, .48th Leglslatsrc, la Its mtnro, thus uklag 1s geaenl appIl- uble the rule 18lU down In tlowsrs v. !‘soos Rirsr R. CO., 4~1606 by t~hr 3qprow Court ol Tore8 am? r*pwtd ln lb6 8. il. (Ild) MO, wbon it is sttstd atbat’ the aaetiaut et w not laW8atio*ll a g m wr alaldew opo ate 88 a npud of l p utlr ula r u 8 lolrl law, by lap Ifort 1em, en6 this is trus althwmgb bot g laws rtlatb to tha sn8e subfeot aattu ...hated la lnatbor vmy~,the psrtlool6r wit 1s oonstrued ~8 tba noeptlon to the germs1 l&w.” ISowwer, the instant aas. 18 (Ilstiagulshaalr, tar IS. B, Se, Ragale riutiloa, 48th Legislaturir is ia- :pzlo .owor all the lsn opsa the sob let rlh rhioh . This is irrJdlst*ly spp~tcat ! ram a rrsdiac( OS the b&U SD it deiiaea en4 ro latu all thlnga ooa- ormod with flshl8gIn Laketr vrl and LakeAustin an6 Vhsrs It is lpprront that a rtrtut8 18 lntondq4 to ubnso s1 the lsw wltb whhh it dssls, it ra iulrt4 to the n8a aable. , Wador thir ml., s 8tM tO th t lWUS t&O 8UbjOOt MW? ai ~O=W law and is widently iat*sded 88 a lhstltuto for it rlthosgh ssntsinivq ss sxpmss usmb to that ar) met o ustw u l cc ml oi the tormmr lrr to the o&d tlmt lta prowPdons 8re ravlsodrd its rida frbsbll aevu~e. A*oordln~l., park of Xoaoohtle r11mD t. Twkmr - tsge 8 tb olrl&al *et th brnt mitt0 4 the 8~ trorr lO~slrtloa l0 to be ooulhmd 8s lnallb4r IS th e letor art lr rlcarl? l~trdO4 to prowtlbr tbo OlIll rulw rhleb SbmU urn, 1t ropools th prior strtrtr, rltRoo& r he tr ome not r*pmateo I& aword 81th thla rtatomust 8ra ?lrrt.Xat oaal flak v. Loo Comity Cotton 011 hapsay, tT4 6. X. 189 tax. Coa. Ap .) ubem the aut ritibs ore ool.lrteds Uw& t4 : UIwrlbr gouaty, 186 3, 8. Sd 88l.rfilxmed (tILeI e&al Luo ** city of PI1 a8, 181 z. 'f* r r it 0r lror r6iuo4; Oo8mcrrl~l Credit Corp8a~ v. aor- i0btb tme0td4 CO~P``F, 18s s. c. (rsa) m4, -it 0r orror r@Iuso4. T h elr4laal ru Ii ot statutory oon5truOtloa 18 to gitr ditat to thr 1s~ datlto latent if it 0aB be ssorrtalned. rd I 0r 14entl0rl rank 18 thet Aaothor the lr~lsldurr lat6ndedto a ‘r o o80~ t 0 p ur p M L~B laaotl~ b rtr