Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

.
9
OFFICEOF ME AII’~RN``GENwuu. OF’IExAa
AUSTIN
Dser sir:
:
YOUF-m.a7,
siden4 by ws orpioe.
. .
aouths. o nlp lr a tlo of
n tin tlma flx.4 by
ala or4.r or the court, the court or JIUQO
theroof, sb4ll enter $lmat on the rov4iot
or plsr na4 the 8UY shall bs lXleut.4 an
plwlde4 by chapter 4, Tit10 g, Of tha co4a
of crkinal Prooduro of tha st8te of Texu.
Prori404 further,that the Court or &&go
tbraof, ill tha Uuol8~ of roud 4lsor~tlon
r~pormittlio4of-twhon judpmt1.
4eforr.4,to nria at large on Illsom rooog-
nlsume, or my roquln hir to oater late
bond in a a10 at but 4oublo th amount of
th els*.D80 mb4 a a n4o o sts,o o n4 ltlo ne4
th a t
th a 4 o ia n4 a ant
n4sumtk o , jointly a n4 WI-
*rally, Vlll pay suob flas em4 oowr tJnl.88
the4e?am4aatperromll~rmjurs oatha m
ret in the or4u an4 4ls~*s the j?uQpont
in tha unnor prari404by Chptor 4, Wtlm Q
or tb Co40 ot orl8lnal Prooa4um-of the
State of Taxas; an4 for tha +foroomsnt of
any j-t ontm4, ell vrrtr, prooesr~r
rad romo41.8 of thr cad* of crldaal rrooo4uro
am ms4e~plloabl4 SO iu &8 aoaosury to
oury out the provl*foM o? thb Artiolo."
Itha~boennpoat ho14 ihat in or4u to *iv* the
Qourt or clYmaal Appeals jurlr
Tl otion on appeal of 8 da4unnor
ouo, the rooor4 Rust oontaln a ffa&l ju4gnnt
ahova flaalju4gmntfs fataltoanrppul. liO3%S&~-
ril4uaoe17l-172 I l22t ovsla;rv. atat 112 Tex. * 8. 651
P8 8. li.(24) l?& Shaffiold'I.Stat., I' To% Cr. App.j 57 S. ir.
(24) 577; White v. state, 139 To%. Cir. R. 415, 141 8. lf. (24)
339, an4 uuy othrs, ss shown ia Tax88 Digest, Criminal Lav,
Kop numbor 1086 (13).
when the rpp*llats jurl8diotloiiofthe CauFt of crlm-
inal Appsals has on00 attaohe4, it oautlauosuntiltha os80, am
r& by ths appeal, is oomj+letelyuoouted by the oourt below,
aud it may 188~8 all writs n80888aa7 to ulce it8 doom8 lffo o -
tin. r,Tax. Jur. 28, I 12, an4 ouea olte4.
l&on a alsdomawr 0480 ha8 bUB afflrm4, th0 Pl?oVt-
aions of ~rtiolea 849, 850 and 851, Cod. of Cr-f.nd Boo.-,
BoaorableJBckYiwh, Page 3
oontrol. %ho rrtlolas ne4 *a follows8
“Art. 689. WJtonths ju&p.entof th hurt
of Crlmlnal Appeals is finrl, tb ol.cHcahsll
make out the propel'o&ftlOd~ of thm p1’00wd-
fngr bQand u4gmmtrsn4~ml, sndrrilthe
Sm8tOth8 C Jlk Ofth.
p r Om1O?
OUr t,
“Ar t.850. when tha mandateof the ocurt
of Wmlnal Appeals Is noelve4 by the proper
clerk, he shall film It vlth ths ~pors of tha
owse, an4 nota It upon the dooket.
"Art.851. In ai84oawnor ouw *here the
fUd&WI&b8 bW8 affii-4, nOSWOOW~8 rubd
bo h4 titer flllng tha nabto, uoapt to far-
ioit the FC400@8UUM aaof 4o?ondMt,or to
I~SW l 88p fa 8.foth r 0 a0f8odmt,0~ UL UOW-
tion 4galwt his pPope*t~, to onfoveo the Jut&-
sent of the oourt, as If no eppul ha4%bwn
taken.*
do not thfBk tb bl¶@U
u8 of hrtiola 698. wn,
authorls* a &fur64 judgmwt van f!ztW&PdtO``~ t0 @88W
vh*r* rppesl IS parfe*t*4W 8ffimo4~by the Court of UHdaal
APtiS- th aw Of th. o#nfo~ that +he jud&mwt Mx bo 4efured
oJzl``tthetrirlj*o, intha qxm8ls~orus &so~tlon,uuI
th.nt& tUW Of th e itatuterut b ltr ietly
follornd.
Your question lo ansvom4 In ths hmgatlve.
Ve vlsh to thank yOu for the btief 8Uhfttd in your
letterreqwstlngthls oplnlon.