Judges: MARK WHITE, Attorney General of Texas
Filed Date: 3/16/1979
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
Honorable Jerome Chapman Texas Department of Human Resources John H. Reagan Building Austin, Texas 78701
Re: Whether the Department of Human Resources and a county which jointly operate an infant adoption program may charge fees.
Dear Mr. Chapman:
You have requested our opinion regarding the collection of adoption fees which are assessed in the infant adoption program operated jointly by the Texas Department of Human Resources and the Bell County Welfare Board. Child Welfare Boards are appointed by the county commissioners courts for the purpose of improving the health, education and welfare of children in the state. V.T.C.S. art. 695a, § 4. The local boards are entities of the Department of Human Resources ``for the purposes of providing coordinated state and local public welfare services for children and their families and coordinated utilization of federal, state, and local funds for these services.' Id. § 4(c). The Department of Human Resources has the duty to ``[a]dminister or supervise all child welfare service, except as otherwise provided for by law.' V.T.C.S. art. 695c, § 4(2). Adopting parents have been charged a fee amounting to 7% of their income. The proceeds of the fees are used generally to underwrite the expenses of the adoption program.
There is no statutory authority for either the Department of Human Resources or Bell County to collect payments from adopting parents, whether such payments are characterized as a fee or reimbursement of government costs. In the absence of specific statutory authorization, the state or county may not assess fees. Nueces County v. Currington,
Very truly yours,
Mark White Attorney General of Texas
John W. Fainter, Jr. First Assistant Attorney General
Ted L. Hartley Executive Assistant Attorney General
Prepared by David B. Brooks Assistant Attorney General