Judges: MARK WHITE, Attorney General of Texas
Filed Date: 8/4/1980
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
Honorable Kenneth H. Ashworth Coordinating Board Texas College and University System P. O. Box 12788, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711
Re: Implementation of the Texas State College and University Employees Uniform Insurance Benefits Act, Ins. Code art.
Dear Commissioner Ashworth:
You ask several questions concerning the Texas State College and University Employees Uniform Insurance Benefits program created by the provisions of article
Article
Sec. 2(f) to recognize the long and faithful service and dedication of employees of the Texas state colleges and universities and to encourage them to remain in service until eligible for retirement by providing health insurance and other group insurance benefits for such employees;
Institutions covered by the Act are required to `contribute monthly to the cost of each insured employee's coverage. . . .' Ins. Code art.
3.50-3 , § 12. The Act defines `employee' to include employees who retire under the Teachers Retirement System of Texas or the Optional Retirement Program established by articles 51.351-51.358 of the Texas Education Code. Ins. Code art.3.50-3 , §§ 3(a)(2), (4). In our opinion, article 3.50-3 clearly requires state agencies of higher education to implement a program of insurance premium payments for retired employees.
You next ask whether the institutions of higher education have authority to use institutional line item appropriations for other items to support the program for retired employees. Section 4b of article IV of the General Appropriations Act for 1979-81 states that `insurance premiums where authorized by law . . . may be purchased from appropriated funds.' Section 4d states that "General Operating Expenses' as used in the medical and dental institutions shall include . . . insurance premiums where authorized by law. . . .' Section 5 provides that, with the approval of the governing board, `transfers may be made between the items of appropriations for the general academic institutions' regardless of whether the items are general revenue or local funds. In our opinion, institutions may transfer appropriation items to pay for insurance premiums for retired employees as permitted by article IV, sections 4b, 4d, and 5 of the General Appropriations Act.
You next ask whether article
Your next question is as follows:
If the cost of the premium payment per employee for the basic coverage(s) prescribed under Article
3.50-3 of the Insurance Code exceed the per employee amount appropriated in the General Appropriations Act for the purpose of insurance premium payments, do the institutions have as obligation to pay the portion of the premium that exceeds the amount appropriated per employee and included in the General Appropriations Act? If so, do the institutions have the authority to use funds included in other line item appropriations in view of Section [25] of Article IV of the General Appropriations Act?
Section 11 of article 3.50-3 provides in part:
From the first day of employment, each active full-time employee who has not waived basic coverage or selected optional coverages shall be protected by a basic plan of insurance coverage automatically. The premium for such coverage shall not exceed the amount of the employer contribution. . . .
In our opinion, this provision contemplates a basic coverage that will be fully funded by the employer contribution. Section 12 requires that institutions and agencies covered by the Act `shall contribute monthly to the cost of each insured employee's coverage no less than the amount appropriated therefor by the legislature in the General Appropriations Act. . . .' Section 25 of article IV of the current Appropriations Act provides that the state's contribution for employee premiums on group life, health, and accident policies should not exceed $35 per month in fiscal 1980 and $40 per month in fiscal 1981.
General legislation enacting or repealing a statute may not be included in a general appropriation bill. Tex. Const. art.
You finally ask whether institutions must contribute to the premium payment of employees paid from non-appropriated funds an amount equal to the premium contribution for employees included in line item appropriations. You also inquire about the source of such premium payments. Section 12 of article 3.50-3 provides in part:
Each institution any agency covered under the provisions of this Act shall contribute monthly to the cost of each insured employee's coverage . . . as determined by the governing board of the institution in its respective official operating budget, if the employees are compensated from funds appropriated by such budgets rather than by the General Appropriations Act. . . .
This provision gives the governing board some discretion as to the amount of premium and the sources within its operating budget. Sections 4b and d of Article IV of the General Appropriations Act permit payment of `insurance premiums where authorized by law' without limiting this benefit to persons compensated by appropriated funds. We therefore believe the governing board may use either appropriated or non-appropriated funds to pay insurance premiums of employees compensated by non-appropriated funds, for example auxiliary employees. If appropriated funds are used, the limitations of premium payments found in section 25 of article IV will be applicable. Of course, the monthly contribution must be large enough to fund the premium for the basic plan to which each employee is entitled under section 11.
Very truly yours,
Mark White Attorney General of Texas
John W. Fainter, Jr. First Assistant Attorney General
Prepared by Susan Garrison Assistant Attorney General
Jessen Associates, Inc. v. Bullock , 531 S.W.2d 593 ( 1975 )
Hamrick v. Simpler , 127 Tex. 428 ( 1936 )
Goldman v. State , 277 S.W.2d 217 ( 1954 )
King's Estate v. Sch. Trustees of Willacy , 33 S.W.2d 783 ( 1930 )
Moore v. Sheppard, Comp. , 144 Tex. 537 ( 1946 )
Conley v. Daughters of Republic of Texas , 151 S.W. 877 ( 1912 )