Judges: MARK WHITE, Attorney General of Texas
Filed Date: 12/31/1982
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
Honorable Ray Farabee Chairman State Affairs Committee Texas State Senate Room 411, State Archives Building Austin, Texas 78711
Re: Construction of article
Dear Senator Farabee:
Article
In 1977, Texas voters approved various amendments to article III, section 49-b, including the following:
The unmarried surviving spouses of veterans who died in the line of duty may also apply to purchase a tract through the Board provided the deceased veterans meet the requirements set out in this Article. . . . (Emphasis added).
Your inquiry concern this provision. Specifically, you ask whether the unmarried surviving spouse of a veteran who received an honorable discharge from the Marine Corps in 1960 and died of a service-connected disability in 1973 is eligible to apply to purchase a tract of land. We understand that the Veterans Administration has in fact determined that the injury which led to this particular veteran's death was service-connected. We further understand that at the time of his death, this veteran was eligible to participate in the Veterans Land Program but had never chosen to do so.
The answer to your question necessarily turns on the meaning of the phrase `died in the line of duty.' The surviving spouse about whom you are concerned is eligible to apply to purchase the aforementioned land only if the scope of this phrase is broad enough to include a veteran whose death resulted from a service-connected injury but occurred thirteen years after he was discharged from the service. See Tex. Const. art.
This phrase is not defined in article III, section 49-b or in the statutes governing the Veterans Land Board. See Nat. Res. Code §§
At first glance, the phrase `died in the line of duty' would appear to embrace only those veterans who actually died while in active service. We cannot, however, imagine any reason why those who proposed and approved this amendment would have wanted it to be construed so rigidly. Nor can we conceive of any sound policy arguments in favor of such a construction. On the contrary, we believe that it is far more likely that those who sponsored and ratified the amendment intended the opposite construction. If an otherwise eligible veteran sustained an injury while in the line of duty and died soon thereafter, while still in active service, his spouse would be eligible to apply to purchase a tract of land. We see no reason why she should be disqualified simply because her spouse had the misfortune not to die until later, after being discharged from the service. The fact that her spouse's death occurred after a lengthy period of time should not, in our opinion, be dispositive of her eligibility under this provision.
We therefore conclude that the spouse about whom you inquired is not automatically disqualified from applying for a tract of land under article III, section 49-b. Whether she is in fact eligible to purchase the land under all other applicable criteria is, of course, beyond the scope of this opinion.
Very truly yours,
Mark White Attorney General of Texas
John W. Fainter, Jr. First Assistant Attorney General
Richard E. Gray III Executive Assistant Attorney General
Prepared by Jon Bible Assistant Attorney General