Judges: JIM MATTOX, Attorney General of Texas
Filed Date: 3/25/1987
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
Mr. Kenneth H. Ashworth Commissioner Coordinating Board Texas College and University System P.O. Box 12788 Austin, Texas 78711
Re: Whether a county that assesses and collects taxes for a community college district may add a 2% fee
Dear Mr. Ashworth:
You ask the following question:
Under Texas law, may a county that assesses and collects taxes for a community college district charge no more than two percent of the ad valorem taxes assessed as a fee for tax assessment and collection?
You are concerned specifically about the Alamo Community College District. See Educ. Code §
Your question arises because of a perceived conflict between one section of the Education Code, section
§ 130.121. Tax Assessment and Collection
(a) The governing board of each junior college district, and each regional college district, for and on behalf of its junior college division, annually shall cause the taxable property in its district to be assessed for ad valorem taxation and the ad valorem taxes in the district to be collected, in accordance with any one of the methods set forth in this section, and any method adopted shall remain in effect until changed by the board.
(b) Each governing board shall be authorized to have the taxable property in its district assessed and/or its taxes collected, in whole or in part, by the tax assessors and/or tax collectors, respectively, of any county, city, taxing district, or other governmental subdivision in which all or any part of the junior college district is located.
(c) The governing board of a joint county junior college district shall be authorized to have the taxable property in its district assessed or its taxes collected, in whole or in part, by the tax assessors or tax collectors, respectively, of any county, city, taxing district, or other governmental subdivision in which all or any part of the joint county junior college district is located. The tax assessors or tax collectors of a governmental subdivision, on the request of the governing board of a joint county junior college district, shall assess and collect the taxes of the joint county junior college district in the manner prescribed in the Property Tax Code. Tax assessors and tax collectors shall receive compensation in an amount agreed on between the appropriate parties, but not to exceed two percent of the ad valorem taxes assessed. (Emphasis added).
Section
(b) The county assessor-collector is entitled to a reasonable fee, which may not exceed the actual costs incurred, for assessing and collecting taxes for a taxing unit pursuant to Subdivisions (1) through (3) of Subsection (a) of Section 6.23 of this code. (Emphasis added).
Section
(a) The county assessor-collector shall assess and collect taxes on property in the county for the state and the county. He shall also assess and collect taxes on property for another taxing unit if:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(3) the governing body of the unit requires the county to assess and collect its taxes as provided by Subsection (c) of Section 6.22 of this code. . . . (Emphasis added).
Junior college districts are governed by chapter 130 of the Education Code. Section 130.004 details the authorized types of public junior colleges and provides the following in pertinent part:
(a) By complying with the provisions of the appropriate following sections of this chapter a public junior college and/or district of any one of the following classifications may be established:
(1) an independent school district junior college;
(2) a city junior college;
(3) a union junior college;
(4) a county junior college;
(5) a joint-county junior college; and
(6) a public junior college as a part or division of a regional college district. [Note: Sections 130.091 to 130.109 governing the creation of regional college districts were repealed by Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 302, § 3.] (Emphasis added).
Subchapter G of chapter 130 of the Education Code sets forth the fiscal provisions applicable to the various types of junior college districts and contains sections 130.121, the section with which you are concerned, to 130.124. Prior to its amendment in 1977, section 130.121 provided at subsection (d) that
[e]ach governing board shall be authorized to have the taxable property in its district assessed, its values equalized, and/or its taxes collected, in whole or in part, by the tax assessors, board[s] of equalization, and/or tax collectors, respectively, of any county, city, taxing district, or other governmental subdivision in which all or any part of the junior college district is located. . . . Such property shall be assessed, the values thereof equalized, and such taxes collected, in the manner and for such compensation as shall be agreed upon between the appropriate parties. . . . (Emphasis Added).
In 1977, subsection (d) was retained and subsection (g) was added. Subsection (g) provided in pertinent part that
[t]he governing board of a joint county junior college district shall be authorized to have the taxable property in its district assessed, its values equalized, or its taxes collected, in whole or in part, by the tax assessors, boards of equalization, or tax collectors, respectively, of any county, city, taxing district, or other governmental subdivision in which all or any part of the joint county junior college district is located. . . . Tax assessors and tax collectors shall receive compensation in an amount agreed upon between the appropriate parties, but not to exceed two percent of the ad valorem taxes assessed. (Emphasis added).
Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 198, § 1, at 563. Section 130.121 was amended to read in its present form, however, in the same bill that enacted the Property Tax Code, with subsection (g) becoming subsection (c). Acts 1979, 66th Leg., ch. 841, § 4(k), at 2320.
A statute should be construed in such a way so that it will harmonize with other existing laws, unless its provisions clearly manifest a contrary intention. Freels v. Walker,
Accordingly, we conclude that, pursuant to section
Very truly yours,
Jim Mattox Attorney General of Texas
Jack Hightower First Assistant Attorney General
Mary Keller Executive Assistant Attorney General
Rick Gilpin Chairman Opinion Committee
Prepared by Jim Moellinger Assistant Attorney General