Judges: MARK WHITE, Attorney General of Texas
Filed Date: 3/23/1981
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
Mr. Homer A. Foerster Executive Director State Purchasing General Services Commission L.B.J. State Office Building Austin, Texas 78711
Re: Construction of section 3.08(a) of article 601b, V.T.C.S.
Dear Mr. Foerster:
You have requested our opinion regarding this question:
Is the commission authorized by section 3.08(a) of article 601b, V.T.C.S., to waive all competitive bidding requirements, whether formal or informal, on delegated purchases under $100?
Article 601b, V.T.C.S., the State Purchasing and General Services Act, provides in pertinent part as follows:
Sec. 3.08. (a) The commission shall establish a procedure by which state agencies shall be delegated the authority to purchase supplies, materials, and equipment if the purchase is less than $500 and shall provide in the procedure that formal competitive bidding is not required for purchases under $100.
. . . .
(d) Agencies making purchases under this section must attempt to obtain at least three competitive bids from sources which normally offer for sale the merchandise being purchased.
. . . .
Sec. 3.10. . . . All purchases of and contracts for supplies, materials, services, and equipment shall, except as provided herein, be based whenever possible on competitive bids.
You state that the commission delegates authority to make such purchases to agencies under its Rule 028.12.01.059(b), but that it asks agencies to take a minimum of three informal competitive bids where possible. The rule does not distinguish between bids under $500 and those under $100, but requires an attempt at competitive bidding in each instance. You further state that the term ``formal competitive bidding' has a rather precise meaning in purchasing circles and that it comprehends ``a bid which has been submitted in a sealed envelope to prevent dissemination of its contents before the specified time and date set for bid opening.'
For the following reasons, we answer your question in the negative. First, section 3.08(a) expressly provides that ``formal' competitive bidding is not required for purchases under $100, not that ``competitive bidding' is not required. We must assume that the legislature used the adjective ``formal' for a purpose, Eddins-Walcher Butane Company v. Calvert,
We therefore conclude that the commission is not authorized by section 3.08(a) of article 601b, V.T.C.S., to waive all competitive bidding requirements, whether formal or informal, on delegated purchases under $100. However, in view of the fact that section 3.10 only requires competitive bids ``whenever possible,' we think the commission may promulgate rules indicating those instances in which it will consider that competitive bids are not possible.
Very truly yours,
Mark White Attorney General of Texas
John W. Fainter, Jr. First Assistant Attorney General
Richard E. Gray III Executive Assistant Attorney General
Prepared by Jon Bible Assistant Attorney General
Matter of Estate of Furr , 1977 Tex. App. LEXIS 3183 ( 1977 )
Sanford v. State , 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2556 ( 1973 )
Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Haunschild , 1975 Tex. App. LEXIS 3034 ( 1975 )
Eddins-Walcher Butane Company v. Calvert , 156 Tex. 587 ( 1957 )
L & M-Surco Manufacturing, Inc. v. Winn Tile Co. , 1979 Tex. App. LEXIS 3524 ( 1979 )