DocketNumber: 05-21-00200-CR
Filed Date: 4/22/2021
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/28/2021
Dismissed and Opinion Filed April 22, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00199-CR No. 05-21-00200-CR MARIAH BARKER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F19-35335-T & F19-35336-T MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Smith Opinion by Justice Molberg On May 7, 2020, after Mariah Barker pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine and possession of cocaine, the trial court deferred adjudication of guilt for four years. Thereafter, the State filed motions to proceed with an adjudication of guilt in each case, alleging appellant had violated numerous terms and conditions of her probation. On March 17, 2021, the trial court continued appellant on probation for an additional year and modified the conditions of her community supervision in each case. Appellant’s notices of appeal, dated March 22, 2021, were filed in this Court on March 29, 2021. As a general rule, an appellate court may consider appeals by criminal defendants only after conviction. Wright v. State,969 S.W.2d 588
, 589 (Tex. App.— Dallas 1998, no pet.). With regards to deferred adjudication, the Legislature has authorized appeal of only two types of orders: (1) an order granting deferred adjudication, and (2) an order imposing punishment pursuant to an adjudication of guilt. Davis v. State,195 S.W.3d 708
, 711 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Orders modifying the terms or conditions of deferred adjudication are not themselves appealable.Id.
Here, there are no judgments of conviction. Rather, the trial court continued appellant on probation in each case. We do not have jurisdiction over an order continuing a defendant on community supervision. Seeid.
We dismiss these appeals for lack of jurisdiction. 210199f.u05 /Ken Molberg/ 210200f.u05 KEN MOLBERG Do Not Publish JUSTICE TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MARIAH BARKER, Appellant On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-21-00199-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F19-35335-T. Opinion delivered by Justice THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Molberg. Justices Goldstein and Smith participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Judgment entered this 22nd day of April, 2021. –3– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MARIAH BARKER, Appellant On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-21-00200-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F19-35336-T. Opinion delivered by Justice THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Molberg. Justices Goldstein and Smith participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Judgment entered this 22nd day of April, 2021. –4–