DocketNumber: 04-17-00750-CR
Filed Date: 1/31/2018
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/7/2018
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00750-CR Kevin Lamar JOHNSON, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2002CR4779 Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr., Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: January 31, 2018 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION In the matter underlying this appeal, Appellant Kevin Lamar Johnson was convicted of aggravated robbery and, on November 6, 2002, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. In 2015, Appellant filed a motion for DNA testing, he appeared at the hearing, and the trial court denied his motion on August 14, 2015. More than two years later, Appellant filed a notice of appeal. Because Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, and his untimely notice of appeal did not invoke this court’s jurisdiction, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 04-17-00750-CR BACKGROUND On July 24, 2002, Appellant was indicted for aggravated robbery of an elderly person causing bodily injury. Appellant was tried by jury and convicted of aggravated robbery (repeater) on November 6, 2002, was fined $10,000.00, and was sentenced to imprisonment for life in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice—Institutional Division. On June 5, 2015, at Appellant’s request, the trial court appointed counsel to represent Appellant in his DNA motion, and counsel filed a motion. Counsel and Appellant appeared in person at the hearing on the motion—and the trial court denied the motion in open court on August 14, 2015. Appellant did not file a motion to reconsider the order, a motion for new trial, or any other post-decision pleading pertaining to the trial court’s August 14, 2015 order—until Appellant filed a notice of appeal on November 9, 2017. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel concedes Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely. LATE NOTICE OF APPEAL A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo v. State,918 S.W.2d 519
, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on September 14, 2015, see TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, or his notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal were due not later than September 28, 2015, seeid. R. 26.3.
Appellant’s November 9, 2017 notice of appeal was not timely filed and did not invoke this court’s appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a);Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522
. We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. SeeOlivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522
; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals,802 S.W.2d 241
, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). -2- 04-17-00750-CR Appellant’s January 4, 2018 pro se motion to represent himself in this appeal is moot. Because we lack jurisdiction, we do not consider Appellant’s January 17, 2018 pro se brief. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -3-