Wanda Faye Rougeau v. the State of Texas

In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-21-00104-CR
WANDA FAYE ROUGEAU, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 64th District Court
Hale County, Texas
Trial Court No. B21487-2007, Honorable Danah L. Zirpoli, Presiding
August 24, 2021
ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND
Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant Wanda Faye Rougeau appeals her conviction for aggravated assault.
Her brief was due August 5, 2021. Now pending before this court are appellant’s motion
for an extension of time to file a brief and a motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s counsel.
The motion to withdraw indicates that appellant seeks to dismiss her counsel and
represent herself on appeal. We abate and remand for further proceedings.
The trial court has the responsibility for appointing counsel to represent indigent
defendants as well as the authority to relieve or replace appointed counsel upon a finding
of good cause. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2) (West Supp.
2020); Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, order). When
an appellant seeks to represent herself on appeal, an appellate court has discretion to
permit self-representation if the appellant can do so without interfering with the
administration of the appellate process. See Bibbs v. State, No. 07-10-00300-CR, 2011
Tex. App. LEXIS 9490, at *4 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Dec. 2, 2011, order) (per curiam). Our
exercise of that discretion depends on a case-by-case analysis of the best interest of the
appellant, the State, and the proper administration of justice. Id.For these reasons, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for
further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine
the following:
1. whether appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether good cause exists for removal of appellant’s appointed counsel;
3. if counsel is removed, whether appellant remains indigent and is entitled to
the appointment of new appellate counsel;
4. if appellant desires to represent herself on appeal, whether her decision to
do so is competently and intelligently made, including whether she is aware
of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, see Hubbard v.
State, 739 S.W.2d 341, 345 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); and
5. if appellant desires to represent herself on appeal, whether allowing her to
do so is in her best interest, in the best interest of the State, and in
furtherance of the proper administration of justice.
2
The trial court shall issue findings of fact and conclusions of law and any necessary
orders addressing the foregoing subjects. If it is determined that 1) appellant is entitled
to appointed counsel, 2) allowing appellant to represent herself on appeal is not in her
best interest or that of the State or the administration of justice, and 3) the attorney/client
relationship between appellant and existing counsel has degraded to the extent that
existing counsel cannot provide appellant reasonably effective assistance, then the trial
court shall appoint new appellate counsel. The name, address, email address, telephone
number, and State Bar number of any newly appointed counsel shall be included in the
aforementioned findings.
The trial court shall also cause to be developed (1) a clerk’s record containing the
findings, conclusions, and any necessary orders; and (2) a reporter’s record transcribing
any evidence and argument presented at the hearing. The supplemental record shall be
filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before September 23, 2021. Should further time
be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before September 23,
2021.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
3