Dominic Talies Potter v. State

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 8, 2019.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-18-00455-CR
DOMINIC TALIES POTTER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 212th District Court
Galveston County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 16-CR-3441
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Dominic Talies Potter appeals his conviction for escape. Tex. Pen.
Code Ann. § 38.06. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he
concludes the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the
requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a
professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable
grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1978).
A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised
of his right to inspect the appellate record and file a pro se response to the brief. See
Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Appellant filed a pro
se response.
We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro se
response and agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no
reversible error in the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised
in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no
arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
2