Gerald Powell v. State

Opinion issued October 27, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-15-00975-CR
———————————
GERALD POWELL, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 400th District Court
Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 14-DCR-066695
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Gerald Powell pleaded guilty to robbery without an agreed
recommendation as to punishment. See TEX. PENAL CODE § 29.02. The trial court
sentenced him to eight years in prison. On appeal, Powell contends that the
evidence before the court was legally insufficient to convict him of robbery.
Because Powell’s stipulation to the crime was legally sufficient to support
the conviction, we affirm.
Background
Gerald Powell was accused of committing a robbery in Fort Bend County,
Texas. According to a Fort Bend County offense report, the complainant,
Rukshana Ali, withdrew $30,000 from a bank and then parked outside her
apartment complex to check her mail. After she left her car, a blue vehicle
occupied by two men pulled up behind her. The passenger demanded that Ali give
him the keys to her vehicle. Ali threw the keys away from him. The passenger ran
to the keys and picked them up. Ali followed him, and he shoved her to the ground,
causing her to fall. Ali suffered minor abrasions from the fall. The passenger then
drove away in Ali’s car along with the $30,000 still inside.
Police recovered Ali’s stolen car in Houston. A forensic team searched for
fingerprints and DNA. After the forensic team discovered Powell’s fingerprints in
the car, a detective created a photo array that included his picture. From this array,
Ali identified Powell as one of the people involved in the robbery.
Powell subsequently was arrested and charged with robbery. The indictment
alleged that he, “while in the course of committing theft and with intent to obtain
or maintain control of the property, intentionally, knowingly, and recklessly
cause[d] bodily injury to Rukshana Ali by pushing Rukshana Ali to the ground.”
2
Powell pleaded guilty to the offense without an agreed recommendation for
sentencing, instead asking for a sentencing hearing before the court. He signed a
document entitled “Defendant’s Plea of Guilty or Nolo Contendere.” This
document bore his initials beside certain admonitions of the court, including a
section titled “Written Stipulation and Judicial Confession,” which stated:
I, the Defendant, after consultation with my attorney,
sign this “Written Stipulation and Judicial Confession” and
have placed my initials in the brackets beside each, to stipulate
and confess to the following:
[ GP ]. That in Fort Bend County, Texas, I (the same
individual indicted in this cause) on 5/16/2014,
committed the acts alleged in the indictment in this
cause, and that the evidence and testimony would
prove beyond a reasonable doubt that acts and
allegations in the indictment in this cause are true
and correct . . . .
After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced Powell to eight years in
prison. The trial court certified his right of appeal. Powell filed a notice of appeal
from the judgment.
Analysis
In his sole issue, Powell asserts that the evidence presented to the trial court
was legally insufficient to support his conviction.
When a felony conviction is based on a guilty plea the State must “introduce
evidence into the record showing the guilt of the defendant and . . . in no event
shall a person charged be convicted upon his plea without sufficient evidence to
3
support the same.” TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 1.15. “The statute expressly
provides that the defendant may consent . . . to an oral or written stipulation of
what the evidence against him would be.” Menefee v. State, 287 S.W.3d 9, 13
(Tex. Crim. App. 2009).
A stipulation of evidence “will suffice to support the guilty plea so long as it
embraces every constituent element of the charged offense.” Id. A stipulation that
incorporates the indictment by reference will satisfy this requirement. See Keller v.
State, 125 S.W.3d 600, 605 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. dism’d).
Additionally, a stipulation to “the indictment as true and correct will constitute a
judicial confession sufficient to support a judgment of conviction.” Menefee, 287
S.W.3d at 16 n.30.
Powell signed a stipulation in which he admitted that he “committed the acts
alleged in the indictment in this cause, and that the evidence and testimony would
prove beyond a reasonable doubt that acts and allegations in the indictment in this
cause are true and correct.” The indictment alleged that Powell, “while in the
course of committing theft and with intent to obtain or maintain control of the
property, intentionally, knowingly, and recklessly cause[d] bodily injury to
Rukshana Ali by pushing Rukshana Ali to the ground.” A person commits robbery
if, in the course of committing theft, and with intent to obtain or maintain control
of property, he intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to
4
another. TEX. PENAL CODE § 29.02; see McCall v. State, 113 S.W.3d 479, 480
(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.). The indictment alleged all of the
constituent elements of the offense of robbery. Thus, Powell’s stipulation served as
sufficient evidence to support his conviction as a result of his guilty plea. See
Menefee, 287 S.W.3d at 13, 16 n.30; Keller, 125 S.W.3d at 605. Powell has not
challenged the stipulation in any form, and the record indicates that his signature
was knowing and voluntary. The trial court had sufficient evidence to convict
Powell. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 1.15. We overrule Powell’s sole issue.
Conclusion
We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Michael Massengale
Justice
Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
5