Bennie Gomez v. State

NO. 07-06-0115-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JUNE 12, 2006

______________________________



BENNIE GOMEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

.

_________________________________

FROM THE 154^TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMB COUNTY;

NO. 4169; HON. FELIX KLEIN, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Bennie Gomez (appellant) appeals his conviction for Driving While Intoxicated. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court assessed punishment at seven years in prison. The certification of appeal executed by the trial court does not disclose that he has the right of appeal; rather it states that he has no right of appeal. By letter dated June 5, 2006, this court notified appellant of this circumstance and that the appeal was subject to dismissal. The court also requested that he either supply us with an amended certification illustrating that he has a right to appeal or inform us why we should continue the appeal, by June 15, 2006. By letter filed June 6, 2006, appellant contends that pursuant to Cooper v State, 45 S.W.3d 77 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001), he has a right to appeal the voluntariness of his plea which was the subject of his motion for new trial. We disagree and find Cooper inapposite. Cooper does not permit the voluntariness of the plea to be raised on appeal when the special notice requirements in plea bargain cases have not been met. Id. at 83. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (requiring that the appeal be dismissed if a certification that shows that the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Brian Quinn Chief Justice

Do not publish.

Trial was had, and judgment was entered denying Devon relief. The two issues before us concern the valuation of minerals by Terry District for ad valorem taxation and the trial court's refusal to award Devon attorney's fees. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

This appeal is a companion to that assigned cause number 07-04-0005-CV. Furthermore, we issued our opinion in cause number 07-04-0005-CV on even date. The opinion, its discussion of the applicable law, and its application of that law control the outcome here. Furthermore, because the record at bar disclosed that Terry District's appraisals comported with the authority and analysis discussed in our opinion in 07-04-0005-CV, we overrule each issue raised by Devon.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Per Curiam

1. Devon's predecessor-in-interest was PennzEnergy.